|Bid||0.0000 x 1400|
|Ask||0.0000 x 3100|
|Day's Range||0.4901 - 0.5229|
|52 Week Range||0.4100 - 1.1200|
|Beta (3Y Monthly)||2.15|
|PE Ratio (TTM)||N/A|
|Forward Dividend & Yield||N/A (N/A)|
|1y Target Est||N/A|
(Bloomberg) -- The Trump administration is throwing a lifeline to the massive Pebble Mine planned near Alaska’s Bristol Bay, as regulators move toward undoing Obama-era environmental restrictions that have thwarted the project.The Environmental Protection Agency on Wednesday said it was resuming consideration of the proposed water pollution restrictions that have effectively stalled the project since they were outlined in 2014. Reconsidering the issue -- after a year-and-a-half hiatus -- is a necessary prelude to the EPA officially lifting the restrictions later.The EPA’s action is a significant boost for Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. and Pebble LP supporters, who have called on the EPA to lift the Clean Water Act restrictions and let the proposed gold, copper and molybdenum mine move forward.Northern Dynasty rose the most since November on the news. Shares were up 27% in New York trading of 11 million shares, 10 times the three-month daily average.Developers have touted the mine’s potential, saying it aims to tap “the most significant undeveloped copper and gold resource in the world,” with 6.5 billion tons of known minerals and another 4.5 billion tons of assumed minerals. The bounty of gold alone is estimated to be worth more than $100 billion.But that mineral lode has been out of reach largely because of the project’s location in southwestern Alaska, inside an area that drains into Bristol Bay, home to the world’s most productive wild salmon fishery. Conservationists, local activists and fishing operations have fought the project for more than a dozen years, warning it could jeopardize the region’s salmon -- and a flourishing fishery with a catch that topped $281 million last year.The Trump administration action targets the EPA’s 2014 proposal limiting the discharge of mining waste in the Bristol Bay watershed. The proposed restrictions, issued under former President Barack Obama even before project developers submitted a mine plan or formally sought government authorizations, could preclude the company from obtaining essential permits from the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers.The restrictions can’t legally be finalized until 2021 because of a court settlement the EPA reached with Pebble Mine in May 2017. Until then, the EPA has agreed not to impose more permanent restrictions under a section of the Clean Water Act governing the dumping of dredged or fill material.Developers have since sought a permit, and the Army Corps is evaluating the project’s environmental impacts. But confusion about the status of the five-year-old proposed limits casts a cloud over the process, EPA General Counsel Matthew Leopold said in a memo released Wednesday. “By making a decision one way or the other, the region will provide much-needed clarity and transparency to the public,” Leopold said.EPA’s move follows calls to scrap the proposed restrictions from conservative and business groups, including Americans for Tax Reform, Americans for Prosperity and the Competitive Enterprise Institute. The groups argued Obama’s EPA effectively issued a preemptive veto of the project, short-circuiting substantive review of the mine based on assumptions about what it would look like. Pebble also argued its new mine plan is significantly different from what the Obama administration anticipated.Restarting the review doesn’t guarantee the proposed limits will be discarded, though agency officials have criticized the agency’s approach under Obama. Leopold’s memo also encourages the EPA to invoke provisions in the Clean Water Act that would ensure the agency remains involved in the Army Corps’ review of the mine permit application. That so-called “elevation” process can be used to spur negotiations over conflicting views of permitting decisions.The United Tribes of Bristol Bay called the move political, saying it came less than two weeks after EPA officials met with community leaders and said they had no intention of changing course.The project would have “devastating consequences on the watershed, the fishery and the people who depend on it for their livelihoods,” said the consortium of 15 tribal governments by email. “It is a purely political decision designed for a sole purpose: to clear the path for foreign mining interests to plow through a toxic project that no one wants.”The Trump administration has taken an inconsistent approach to the project.First, under former EPA Administrator Scott Pruitt, the agency proposed lifting the Obama water limits before Pruitt made a surprise decision to leave them in place eight months later. Now, the EPA is effectively reinstating the process that was underway before Pruitt’s pivot. Current EPA Administrator Andrew Wheeler has recused himself from any involvement in the issue, because his former law firm Faegre Baker Daniels LLP provided services to Pebble.Northern Dynasty has been raising funds amid the government review. On June 24, the company closed the sale of 12.2 million shares, raising $5 million, saying it needed the money to fund the ongoing environmental impact study of the project and continued “outreach and engagement with political and regulatory offices.” It also sold large blocks of shares in March, raising more than $10 million.The project still faces headwinds -- including stiff political opposition in Congress, where a provision that would temporarily block the project was tucked into a House spending bill earlier this month.(Updates with shares, tribal comment and memo link from fourth paragraph.)\--With assistance from Stephen Lee and Susan Decker.To contact the reporter on this story: Jennifer A. Dlouhy in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.orgTo contact the editors responsible for this story: Jon Morgan at email@example.com, Elizabeth Wasserman, John HarneyFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
Many silver stocks looked beaten up in 2017, either near a bottom or struggling to overcome a resistance price. Silver companies are dependent to some extent on the yield on bank CDs or Treasury bonds.
The Vancouver, British Columbia-based company said it had a loss of 3 cents per share. For the year, the company reported that its loss narrowed to $12.3 million, or 4 cents per share. In the final minutes ...
A specialty petroleum products supplier, a propane distributor, and development-stage gold and copper miner have struggled mightily recently.
After plummeting in 2018, Northern Dynasty stock is off to an incredible start in 2019...but don't think that the volatility here has ended.
Although there wasn't any big news in January, a gold price rally and continued market support were enough to excite speculators.
The Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: Lululemon Athletica, Mountain Province Diamonds, Toronto-Dominion Bank and Northern Dynasty Minerals
Unexpected growth in Canada's GDP in July reflects the country's resilience to harsh winters and global economic downturns.
The Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: Blue Hills, Berkshire Hathaway, Apple, Tecnoglass and Northern Dynasty
Gold prices are likely to recover as India gears up for the wedding season and major festivals, when gold buying is considered auspicious.
The Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: Lululemon, Canada Goose, Algonquin Power, Mountain Province and Northern Dynasty
Following negotiations between officials of the United States and Canada, and the Canadian economy's stable growth, Canada's stocks are expected to garner investor attention
The Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: Northern Dynasty Minerals, Vista Gold and Kirkland Lake Gold
Gold prices have been falling since the beginning of the year for several reasons, but it might have achieved a tentative bottom. So, bargain-hunting investors should watch these 3 stocks.
The Zacks Analyst Blog Highlights: Timmons Gold, Northern Dynasty Minerals, New Gold, Sibanye Gold and Pershing Gold
After a blockbuster start to the year, gold has fallen out of investors’ favor, thanks to rising interest rates and a strong dollar. The yellow metal logged in the sixth consecutive weekly decline and the worst weekly drop since December, shedding 2.2% last week. This followed the metal’s fourth consecutive monthly decline in July that represents the longest stretch of losses since 2013.Source: Bullion Vault via Flickr (Modified)