NWQ.F - Best Pacific International Holdings Limited

Frankfurt - Frankfurt Delayed Price. Currency in EUR

Best Pacific International Holdings Limited

Xinsha Port Industrial Park
Machong Town
Dongguan
China
852 3185 3185
http://www.bestpacific.com

SectorConsumer Cyclical
IndustryTextile Manufacturing
Full Time Employees6,967

Key Executives

NameTitlePayExercisedYear Born
Mr. Yuguang LuExec. ChairmanN/AN/A1966
Mr. Haitao ZhangCEO & Exec. DirectorN/AN/A1970
Ms. Zheng TingtingCOO, VP of Marketing of Group & Exec. DirectorN/AN/A1975
Mr. Shaolun WuExec. DirectorN/AN/A1965
Mr. Yiu Sing ChanCFO & Company Sec.N/AN/A1979
Amounts are as of and compensation values are for the last fiscal year ending on that date. Pay is salary, bonuses, etc. Exercised is the value of options exercised during the fiscal year. Currency in EUR.

Description

Best Pacific International Holdings Limited, together with its subsidiaries, manufactures, trades in, and sells lingerie materials. The company offers elastic fabrics, elastic webbing, lace, and other products for use in the production of lingerie, as well as sportswear, such as sports bras, cycling outfits, running and yoga outfits, and casual apparel; and shoulder straps, lingerie trims, and waistbands. The company sells its products to lingerie and sportswear brand owners and manufacturers in Hong Kong, the People's Republic of China, Sri Lanka, Vietnam, Thailand, Europe, the United States, Indonesia, India, South Korea, and internationally. The company was founded in 2003 and is headquartered in Dongguan, the People's Republic of China. Best Pacific International Holdings Limited is a subsidiary of Grandview Capital Investment Limited.

Corporate Governance

Best Pacific International Holdings Limited’s ISS Governance QualityScore as of N/A is N/A. The pillar scores are Audit: N/A; Board: N/A; Shareholder Rights: N/A; Compensation: N/A.

Corporate governance scores courtesy of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). Scores indicate decile rank relative to index or region. A decile score of 1 indicates lower governance risk, while a 10 indicates higher governance risk.