Previous Close | 14.27 |
Open | 14.28 |
Bid | 14.18 x 0 |
Ask | 14.20 x 0 |
Day's Range | 14.12 - 14.36 |
52 Week Range | 11.05 - 16.23 |
Volume | |
Avg. Volume | 7,507,856 |
Market Cap | 19.538B |
Beta (5Y Monthly) | 1.04 |
PE Ratio (TTM) | N/A |
EPS (TTM) | -1.42 |
Earnings Date | Apr 27, 2023 |
Forward Dividend & Yield | 0.68 (4.71%) |
Ex-Dividend Date | Jan 09, 2023 |
1y Target Est | 17.48 |
E nergy giant Repsol has bought into Europe's drive for green jet fuel, but believes the 200 million euro ($217 million) plant it is building in southeast Spain faces a bumpier ride than if it was on the other side of the Atlantic. Repsol says the plant, which transforms used cooking oil into so-called sustainable aviation fuel (SAF), has attracted plenty of customers. Repsol's worries echo those of Europe's aviation sector, much of which is tasked with boosting SAF use to 10% of all jet fuel by 2030, despite it currently costing up to five times as much.
(Reuters) -Repsol has decided against developing a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal on Canada's east cost because it would cost too much to ship the gas to the terminal, the company said on Thursday. Spanish company Repsol had been looking into developing an LNG export terminal in Saint John, New Brunswick, to supply European markets, part of a global push to secure alternative supplies to Russian gas following the invasion of Ukraine. But to reach the terminal gas would have to be transported thousands of kilometres from western Canada, requiring new pipeline capacity through Canadian provinces and northeastern U.S. states that in the past have resisted fossil fuel development.
Repsol has decided against developing a liquefied natural gas (LNG) terminal on Canada's east cost because it would cost too much to ship the gas to the terminal, the company said on Thursday. Spanish company Repsol had been looking into developing an LNG export terminal in Saint John, New Brunswick, to supply European markets, part of a global push to secure alternative supplies to Russian gas following the invasion of Ukraine. But to reach the terminal gas would have to be transported thousands of kilometres from western Canada, requiring new pipeline capacity through Canadian provinces and northeastern U.S. states that in the past have resisted fossil fuel development.