|Bid||104.46 x 0|
|Ask||104.47 x 0|
|Day's Range||104.04 - 104.78|
|52 Week Range||90.10 - 107.91|
|Beta (3Y Monthly)||0.98|
|PE Ratio (TTM)||12.09|
|Earnings Date||Aug 21, 2019|
|Forward Dividend & Yield||4.08 (3.91%)|
|1y Target Est||111.93|
TORONTO , July 16, 2019 /CNW/ - Wellbeing in the workplace is increasingly important, with good employee health and happiness increasingly linked to better performance and productivity. In fact, according to a recent RBC Insurance poll, the majority of working Canadians (80 per cent) report that their overall wellbeing would improve if their employer were to offer a personalized wellness program that is customized to an individual's specific wellness and health related interests and goals.
(Bloomberg Opinion) -- Investors are giddy about Amazon.com Inc.’s fast-growing pool of advertising sales, which largely come from merchandise sellers buying commercial messages to make their goods more prominent on Amazon’s website.Calling this “advertising” is true, but also a misnomer that leads investors to imagine a Google-like marketing machine inside Amazon. It’s not – or not yet, at least. Amazon’s advertising is better understood as an additional tax the company imposes on the millions of businesses that sell through its vast digital mall. It’s one more toll extracted from sellers to access the fast lane of Amazon’s beautiful freeway for shopping.Ads may be a justified expense for merchants to access Amazon’s hundreds of millions of shoppers, and it’s a common business tactic to juice revenue. But it’s also risky for Amazon to milk its merchants for a higher effective commission than most businesses of its kind can command. And as regulators and politicians question whether the superpowers of U.S. tech are using their popular services to unfairly advantage themselves, Amazon may pay a cost in reputation the more it squeezes cash from its hold on online shopping. More than half the items bought on Amazon come from independent merchants that sell slacks or bocce sets through the e-commerce king. Amazon in some cases handles a lot of the leg work, in exchange for commissions and other fees. In recent years, Amazon has given those “marketplace” sellers and product manufacturers more options to buy Google-like advertisements, in part based on product searches, for an additional cost. Someone typing "dog beds" into Amazon’s search box, for instance, might first see results from the FurHaven brand or a merchant that resells pet products on Amazon, with an icon that notes those listings are “sponsored.” RBC last year estimated that about one out of every six product results on Amazon’s app was a sponsored listing. Products from companies without paid listings are pushed further down the page.As Amazon kicks off its annual Prime Day fake shopping holiday, it appears the company is offering even more paid product promotions. All those advertisements make up most of Amazon’s $11 billion yearly sales in a category that also includes fees for its branded credit cards. In my conversations with businesses that sell products on Amazon or advise merchants, there isn’t much hostility about Amazon charging them for promotion on top of other fees. Companies realize that paying to make their merchandise front and center on Amazon is a cost of doing business, and they generally say those paid placements generate enough sales to justify the expense. In a survey of businesses that sell on Amazon, the merchant services firm Feedvisor found three-quarters of respondents were satisfied with Amazon’s advertising platform. Ads, of course, also transfer money from merchants to Amazon’s wallet. The company on average takes about 26 cents of each dollar of transactions made by its marketplace vendors, according to Bloomberg Opinion estimates from Amazon’s disclosures. Add in an estimate of Amazon's revenue from the merchants’ advertising — which, again, is mostly an added fee paid by goods sellers and product manufacturers as a cost of doing business — and Amazon’s average haul per transaction likely tops 29 cents on each dollar.(2) In 2015, the company’s take was closer to 20 cents. Other marketplace businesses that connect sellers with customers — eBay Inc., Airbnb Inc. and Grubhub Inc., for example — tend to take an effective commission of 15% to 25% on each transaction, including advertisements if available.(3) Consider that some makers of apps, including Spotify and the company behind the the Fortnite video game, have complained that Apple Inc.’s up to 30% commission on transactions in its iPhone app store is far too high. Amazon itself doesn’t sell its e-books, movie downloads or other digital goods in the company’s iPhone apps, to avoid giving Apple a cut of 30 cents on every dollar — about what Amazon takes from its merchants.To be fair, Amazon is doing a lot of work for its cut of sales. It provides a vast customer base for merchants, often stores inventory for them and handles shipments, and takes responsibility for customer service and payments. That’s arguably far more work than Apple does for its 30% commission on a purchase of an iPhone game.(1) And all advertising is, in a way, a toll levied by a powerful distributor. Businesses buy ads on Facebook and Google to ensure their products and services don’t get drowned out by a sea of other information. Frito-Lay pays a supermarket extra to ensure its chips are on visible spots on shelves. Alibaba and eBay sell ads similar to those that Amazon offers to merchants. There’s nothing particularly unusual about what Amazon is doing in carving out room for merchants to market themselves, for a fee.But there is also something perverse about paying Amazon a kind of tax to make sure your product is seen on Amazon, so people will buy the item on Amazon. Even Google’s ad empire isn’t this kind of a closed loop. And if one Amazon merchant doesn’t purchase an ad, one of its competitors’ dog beds — or Amazon's own brand — might instead nab an eye-catching display and wrest a sale instead. Amazon is just different, in a way that makes typical business tactics a little icky. Amazon’s growing cut from its merchants is one reason why the company's revenue is increasing more quickly than its merchandise sales. Amazon is extracting a bigger share for itself. Like other powerful tech companies, Amazon is able to charge more to the partners that rely on it, because they don't really have a choice. (Updates the “Take a Cut” chart to include an average effective commission for Airbnb instead of the high end of listed commission rates.)(1) This estimate is based on recent company disclosures that for the first time enabled calculations of the total value of goods sold on Amazon's digital mall. My calculation of Amazon's effective commission is the company's 2018 reported net revenue from commissions and other fees paid by marketplace vendors, $42.7 billion, out of roughly $166 billion in total merchandise sales made by those independent merchants. The effective commission including advertising is a rougher estimate, because it assumes 58% of Amazon's "other" revenue of $10.1 billion in 2018 -- primarily ads but also other services -- are paid listings purchased by Amazon's marketplace merchants. (That percentage corresponds to the merchants' share of total sales on Amazon.) The figure may overestimate Amazon's take from merchants, but probably not by much.(2) These companies’ effective take of transactions in some cases isn't entirely comparable to Amazon’s, because they do more or less work for their commissions and other fees. But they each get paid for their role as middlemen.(3) Earlier this year, my Bloomberg colleague Spencer Soper wrote about the mixed feelings among companies that sell on Amazon. Many of them find customers they couldn't have reached without Amazon, but some also grouse about the growing array of fees they pay the e-commerce giant or other downsides of selling goods there. Some merchants told Soper that Amazon is taking upwards of 40% of each sale.To contact the author of this story: Shira Ovide at email@example.comTo contact the editor responsible for this story: Beth Williams at firstname.lastname@example.orgThis column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.Shira Ovide is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering technology. She previously was a reporter for the Wall Street Journal.For more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com/opinion©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
RBC Global Asset Management launches new suite of five global portfolios designed to address home country bias
(Bloomberg) -- Treasury Secretary Steven Mnuchin warned House Speaker Nancy Pelosi that the government may run out of cash in early September if Congress doesn’t raise U.S. borrowing authority.“Based on updated projections, there is a scenario in which we run out of cash in early September, before Congress reconvenes,” Mnuchin said in a letter to Pelosi on Friday. “As such, I request that Congress increase the debt ceiling before Congress leaves for summer recess.”Pelosi said Thursday that Congress should act this month to raise the debt ceiling, which was the first time she offered a definitive timeline. It’s not clear that lawmakers and the White House will strike a deal before the House is set to leave town on July 26 for a six-week recess.Mnuchin and Pelosi spoke twice about the debt limit on Thursday and again on Friday. They will probably speak again over the weekend, according to a Democratic aide.Congressional leaders acknowledged this week that waiting until September to raise U.S. borrowing authority increases the prospects of an unprecedented default. Lawmakers are scheduled to be back in Washington Sept. 9.Republicans, Democrats and Trump administration officials intensified their negotiations this week, and all sides say a deal will get done.‘Significant Risk’The Treasury has been using accounting measures to avoid missing payments since the borrowing limit snapped back into place on March 2. The department’s room to maneuver depends on tax revenue, and the Bipartisan Policy Center, an independent think tank, this week adjusted its estimate to say there is a “significant risk” of defaulting on a key payment in early September.Rates on bills maturing in mid-to-late September rose Friday, while those in early to mid-October have declined. Before the BPC estimate this week, early to mid-October maturities were the securities that had been under pressure as being most under risk of non-payment if the debt ceiling wasn’t increased in time.“You can see now that there’s a little bit of a bulge higher in bill rates in the September time frame,” said Michael Cloherty, a New-York based strategist at RBC, attributing that move to Mnuchin’s letter. “The way Mnuchin phrased it was that there are some scenarios when it can happen in early September, not that it’s the likely one.”The U.S. government will run out of cash and borrowing authority about Oct. 6, meaning payments won’t be able to be fully met if the debt ceiling isn’t increased. Borrowing authority will run too close for comfort before the September corporate tax payments come in, with only about $10 billion of room to spare.The Treasury bill market reflects the risk, with yields on issues maturing in early September and October trading significantly higher than the adjacent parts of the curve. A default of this kind would likely be measured in hours, as Congress can vote to raise the debt ceiling, but it would require various defensive measures by holders of T-bills, such as money market funds.-Ira F. Jersey and Angelo Manolatos, Bloomberg IntelligenceMitch McConnell and Kevin McCarthy, the Republican leaders in the Senate and House, also say Congress should raise the debt limit this month.House Democrats have been trying to leverage the debt ceiling bill to increase federal spending caps, and they were looking to negotiate those caps after their August recess.A spending caps deal, which could cover two fiscal years, would avoid an automatic $126 billion cut at the end of the calendar year. Such an agreement would help the government avoid another shutdown when funding runs out Oct. 1.If the combined debt ceiling and budget deal continues to elude lawmakers, Democrats and Republicans have begun to talk openly of a short-term debt ceiling increase this month while budget talks continue.(Updates with Friday phone call in the fourth paragraph and market reaction in the eighth paragraph.)\--With assistance from Mitchell Martin and Liz Capo McCormick.To contact the reporters on this story: Erik Wasson in Washington at email@example.com;Saleha Mohsin in Washington at firstname.lastname@example.orgTo contact the editors responsible for this story: Alex Wayne at email@example.com, Anna Edgerton, Justin BlumFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
(Bloomberg) -- Treasury two-year yields may slide to 1% by the end of 2020 as the Federal Reserve makes a succession of interest-rate cuts to support growth, Citigroup Inc. says. The dollar is set to slide in that scenario, according to Pacific Investment Management Co.“We’re at a point where we’re weighing whether the Fed will cut for insurance or if they’re entering a period of structural, cyclical downturn in interest rates -- I’m leaning more towards the latter,” said Shyam Devani, senior technical strategist at Citigroup in Singapore. “I wouldn’t be surprised if we see two-year yields dropping to 1% by the end of next year.”Citi is forecasting the Fed will lower its benchmark rate by 25 basis points this month and potentially cut another two times by year-end. “Inflation expectations remain low, we have a global slowdown in growth and commodity prices remain weak,” he said. “The Fed could cut well into next year.” Traders are pricing in close to three quarters of a percentage point of easing by year-end after Chairman Jerome Powell’s dovish testimony to Congress on Wednesday, when he cited slowing global expansion and trade tensions as threats to the U.S. economy. The Treasury two-year yield was one basis point lower on the at 1.82% in New York morning trading after sliding eight basis points on Wednesday.Pimco’s ViewWhether the dollar is poised for a prolonged decline depends on how the central bank positions its July move -- especially if it’s the beginning of a cycle, said Erin Browne, a managing director and portfolio manager at Pimco in Newport Beach, California.“What really matters is, is this an insurance cut or a sustained move lower?” she said in a Bloomberg Television interview on Wednesday. “If it’s a sustained move lower, I think the curve steepens fairly significantly from here and we could start to see the dollar really roll over.”The dollar would be particularly vulnerable against the euro and potentially the yen should the Fed embark on a series of rate cuts, Browne said. The Bloomberg Dollar Spot Index fell 0.3% on Thursday, extending its decline to 1.7% from this year’s high set in May.Powell’s remarks not only failed to push back against the rate cut that’s fully priced in for July, they boosted the rate-cut narrative, Andrew Hollenhorst, chief U.S. economist at Citigroup in New York, wrote in a research note.A 50 basis-point cut in July is a real possibility, though a 25 basis-point move is likely to be the compromise policy outcome, he said.Here’s what other market participants are saying:Dollar Catalyst (BNP Paribas)Powell’s testimony “is a good potential catalyst for a resumption of the USD weakness we saw last month,” analysts including Shahid Ladha saidFlatter Curve (DBS Bank)Treasury yield curve may flatten ahead of Fed’s July meeting as markets are already more than fully priced for an “insurance” rate cut. “I’m biased toward some flattening” in the 2-10 year part of the U.S. yield curve, said Eugene Leow, rates strategist in SingaporeGreenback Winner (State Street)The dollar could climb even after the Fed cuts as investors may start to cover underweight positions. “All the roads point to one result: that the dollar could possibly be the sole winner,” said Bart Wakabayashi, branch manager in TokyoAvoiding Panic (Commerzbank)“A 50bps cut would smack a bit too much of panic,” said Bernd Weidensteiner, economist in Frankfurt. “After the release of a rather strong employment report on Friday, a large step is unlikely”Dollar Gain (RBC Capital Markets)“The dollar would remain as G-10’s highest yielder and that should lend support to dollar in a low vol/carry-obsessed world,” said Daria Parkhomenko, FX strategist in New York(Updates prices, chart.)\--With assistance from Chikafumi Hodo, Masaki Kondo and Katherine Greifeld.To contact the reporters on this story: Ruth Carson in Singapore at firstname.lastname@example.org;Chester Yung in Singapore at email@example.comTo contact the editors responsible for this story: Tan Hwee Ann at firstname.lastname@example.org, Nicholas ReynoldsFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
TORONTO , July 10, 2019 /CNW/ - Royal Bank of Canada (RY on TSX and NYSE) is pleased to announce the appointment of Frank Vettese to its Board of Directors. Most recently, Mr. Vettese was a two-term Managing Partner and Chief Executive of Deloitte Canada for seven years and also served as Chair of the Americas Executive. Prior to that, he led one of Deloitte's four global business lines as the Managing Partner of Financial Advisory.
(Bloomberg) -- Want the lowdown on European markets? In your inbox before the open, every day. Sign up here.Investors are becoming increasingly skeptical that Christian Sewing can pull off the biggest overhaul in Deutsche Bank AG’s recent history.What many are certain about: it’s still not the time to own its shares. The stock, which already had the lowest price-to-book ratio of any big European bank, has plunged almost 10% this week and 15% from its Monday peak.Initial optimism surrounding Chief Executive Officer Christian Sewing’s sweeping revamp has quickly given way to doubts over whether the German lender can reach its profit goals in a competitive home market. The bank has consistently disappointed shareholders in recent years, and after the overhaul will be focused on servicing companies’ routine financing needs while also withholding dividends for this year and next.The vast restructuring -- which will see 18,000 job losses -- is forecast to cost 7.4 billion euros ($8.3 billion) and will shrink the bank’s capital buffers.“Execution risk seems higher than we initially expected given more headwinds to capital,” Anke Reingen, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets, wrote in a note to clients. Deutsche Bank’s plan “appears to leave little room for error.”‘Highly Improbable’Deutsche Bank reaching its 2022 profitability goal is “highly improbable,” given that the lender will probably lose revenue in the process, according to Citigroup Inc. analysts. The company is completely exiting some businesses, such as equities trading, and has said the retrenchment could also lead to the loss of revenue in other businesses it wants to keep.Deutsche Bank is creating what it’s calling a “capital-release unit” to handle the wind-down of non-strategic assets so it can focus on its main businesses. The holdings and related businesses being moved to the unit represented 74 billion euros of risk-weighted assets and 288 billion euros of leverage exposure at the end of last year.The shares fell as much as 6.5% on Tuesday and were trading 4% lower at 6.52 euros as of 4:49 p.m. in Frankfurt. The stock has declined about 6.5% this year.Much of the short-term outlook for the bank is also unclear. While Deutsche Bank expects to post a loss this year because of the overhaul charges, “we’re working toward being break-even or better in 2020,” said Chief Financial Officer James von Moltke.“Obviously there’s a significant amount of uncertainty in that forecast as we go through the restructuring, whether it’s the timing of restructuring or other things,” he told reporters on a conference call on Monday.Credit investors are concerned about the fallout from a lower capital buffer even though Deutsche Bank said that it would be in a position to pay coupons on its debt throughout the restructuring. The bank’s riskiest bonds, known as additional tier 1 notes, dropped 3 cents on the euro to 85 cents, the lowest in more than a month, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The price of credit-default swaps insuring Deutsche Bank’s debt against losses rose for a second day, indicating deteriorating perceptions of credit quality.Deutsche Bank coordinated its plans with regulators and bases its targets on conservative assumptions, Sewing said in London on Monday.Different Now“Some may say you have heard this before, or at least parts of it,” he told reporters on a conference call. “It is different this time, we are different. We are not going to shareholders to share the burden, we are going to manage this transformation organically. We are not denying or turning a blind eye to our weaknesses.”The CEO also signaled that he’s going to link his personal wealth even closer to the fortunes of the bank he’s overhauling on Monday, telling analysts “I want to lead by example. I am personally putting my money where my mouth is,” without giving more details of his planned investment.(Updates share price in eighth paragraph.)To contact the reporters on this story: Nicholas Comfort in Frankfurt at email@example.com;Katie Linsell in London at firstname.lastname@example.orgTo contact the editors responsible for this story: Dale Crofts at email@example.com, Ross LarsenFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
(Bloomberg) -- The backdrop for miners is ready to brighten in the second half of this year. They just need a resolution of the trade war between the U.S. and China to light a fire under their stocks.Metal prices and mining equities have been at the mercy of trade headlines all year, and business fundamentals have a taken a back seat. To be sure, easier central bank policies around the world have helped some metals, especially gold and silver. But a resolution of the trade tension between U.S. and China -- or at least some steps to bring down the temperature -- could prove the ultimate catalyst for the metals and mining complex.The S&P 500 Metals & Mining Index is up 12% so far this year, lagging the S&P 500 return of 19%. But that performance was mainly driven by gold stocks, while base metals underperformed. The BI Global Base Metals Competitive Peer Index is down 5.5% this year, while the VanEck Vectors Gold Miners ETF is higher by 21%.In fact, the discrepancy in performance between gold and base metal prices has widened heading into the second half of this year. Gold had a blockbuster start to the summer owing to expectations of a U.S. Federal Reserve rate cut, while base metals investors stayed cautious due to the potential impact of disputes on the commercial demand for metals. That’s led some industry analysts to ratchet up their preference for gold in the second half and into 2020 while remaining cautious on the base metals outlook.The supply and demand outlook for base metals is relatively tight, which means a healthy market for miners, according to a report from RBC’s Mining & Materials Equity Team. The outlook for gold in the near-term has improved due to expectations for lower rates, but there’s also risk to precious metals if geopolitical tensions in the Persian Gulf subside, the team said.BMO analysts led by Colin Hamilton agreed with that view. Precious metals prices have been quickly helped by rate cut expectations, but investors “still face a world where the industrial economy remains nervous about the impact of trade friction,” they said.RBC’s team has become “more constructive” on gold prices heading into the second half of 2019 and for 2020. The team also thinks base metals can go higher in the second half of 2019, since most of the macroeconomic concerns have been reflected in prices. But the recent rally in iron ore seems to be unsustainable and could turn back in the third quarter, RBC said.BMO also prefers precious metals, believing that the sentiment for gold has shifted to a new, higher range. The bank has a stable outlook for base metals but thinks any outperformance in the sector may have to wait until trade tension lifts. But in the copper market, BMO says the recent sell-off in copper prices is unjustified and expects higher prices into the year-end, with or without a trade accord.Easier trade rhetoric could translate into some downside for gold and silver, and a big rally in base metals. A continuation of the status quo might translate into further declines for base metal miners or, at best, leave the sector waiting for the next shoe to drop.What Bloomberg Intelligence saysGold-price appreciation is likely to be the dominant and most concerning 2H theme for the metals, especially if the peak-dollar theme that’s gaining credibility with a dovish Federal Reserve provides the final rally pillar. Gold has worthy catalysts for price gains after five years of caged trading. It stands to be the primary beneficiary, absent a definitive U.S.-China trade accord that reverses accelerating global declines in sovereign-debt yields, rate-cut expectations and increasing stock-market volatility.Industrial metals will benefit if the greenback declines, which places the broad sector on stable 2H footings. The Bloomberg All Metals Total Return Index is poised to reverse a prolonged period of underperformance vs U.S. equities, as we see it.-- Mike McGlone, commodity strategist-- Click here to read the research(Updates 3rd paragraph with share performances.)To contact the reporter on this story: Aoyon Ashraf in Toronto at firstname.lastname@example.orgTo contact the editors responsible for this story: Brad Olesen at email@example.com, Scott Schnipper, Catherine LarkinFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
Dividend paying stocks like Royal Bank of Canada (TSE:RY) tend to be popular with investors, and for good reason...
(Bloomberg) -- Oil plunged in the last few minutes of trading as economic anxiety hangs over the market.Futures gave up more than 1% of the day’s gains moments before settlement, closing just 0.3% higher in New York on Monday. Prices had risen for much of the session after BP Plc diverted a vessel in the Persian Gulf, fearing it might be targeted for retaliation after British forces seized an Iranian tanker last week. Saudi Arabia, meanwhile, said it had foiled an attack on a commercial ship in the Red Sea by Iran-backed Houthi rebels.The retreat near the close suggested traders are still contending with an “overriding negative sentiment,” said Ashley Petersen, an oil analyst at Stratas Advisors LLC in New York. Relatively light summer trading volumes may have exacerbated the slide.“This could be an example of markets still expecting the worst,” she said.Crude slid last week as worries about deteriorating global demand outweighed a move by the Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies to extend production cuts. Investors are also waiting for Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell’s testimony to Congress this week, which may offer clarity on the central bank’s plans for rate cuts.“Iran news is certainly dominating sentiment in the market, but I also think the post-OPEC selloff was a bit unwarranted,” said Michael Tran, managing director for energy strategy at RBC Capital Markets LLC in New York. So investors “woke up today to more geopolitical risk and a market that was likely oversold.”West Texas Intermediate oil for August delivery closed 15 cents higher at $57.66 a barrel on the New York Mercantile Exchange. It had risen as much as 1.7% earlier in the day. Brent for September settlement fell 12 cents to $64.11 a barrel on the ICE Futures Europe Exchange.With tensions escalating, European powers urged Iran to reverse its decision to breach the levels of uranium enrichment permitted under a 2015 nuclear accord. On Saturday, France and Iran agreed to resume talks by mid-July. Yet U.S. Secretary of State Michael Pompeo said in a tweet Sunday that Iran’s latest expansion of its nuclear program “will lead to further isolation and sanctions.”WTI will struggle to sustain a move above the low $60s, according to RBC’s Tran. New refinery capacity in China means Asia is saturated with gasoline and other fuels, capping demand for crude, he said.“In order to get a sustained and material rally, we first need to clean up the sloppy global market for refined products,” Tran said.\--With assistance from Sharon Cho, Tsuyoshi Inajima and Harkiran Dhillon.To contact the reporters on this story: Alex Nussbaum in New York at firstname.lastname@example.org;Grant Smith in London at email@example.comTo contact the editors responsible for this story: James Herron at firstname.lastname@example.org, Catherine Traywick, Mike JeffersFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
(Bloomberg) -- Pound traders may be underplaying the risk of a no-deal Brexit under Boris Johnson after the frontrunner for the U.K.’s next prime minister said he is “not bluffing.”The options market has become more pessimistic in recent weeks on sterling’s fortunes over the next six months compared to the three-month period before the Oct. 31 deadline to leave the European Union. The risk premium is likely to grow if Johnson is confirmed as prime minister this month, according to MUFG and Mizuho Bank Ltd.The pound’s fortunes have been dictated since the 2016 Brexit referendum by the growing and ebbing prospects for a deal with Brussels and approval by Parliament. The currency is near its lowest level this year after Prime Minister Theresa May stepped down and both contenders to replace her have said they are ready to walk away from the bloc.“The market is heavily underestimating the chances of a no deal,” said Neil Jones, head of hedge fund currency sales at Mizuho. “Whilst volatility is still low, it’s worth putting on some downside protection through the October-December period.”Pound risk-reversals, a gauge of options sentiment and positioning, are at 175 basis points in favor of selling sterling over six months, compared to 81 basis points over three months. The spread between the two is already near the widest since 2016. While bets on swings in the currency are also higher over six months, those have slid so far in July.For Royal Bank of Canada’s chief currency strategist Adam Cole, the risk of a hard Brexit is now around 30%-35%, although it is hard to separate from the risk of a general election. The market is moving to price in both outcomes thanks to “ever greater certainty that Boris Johnson will win the leadership contest,” he said.As Conservative party members start to voting in the leadership ballot, a YouGov poll published in the Times indicated Johnson is backed by 74% of them, compared to 26% for rival Jeremy Hunt.“The options market has been pricing in more downside risks for the pound after the end of the Article 50 period in October,” said Lee Hardman, a currency strategist at MUFG. “We don’t believe the market has fully adjusted yet.”(Updates to add Royal Bank of Canada.)To contact the reporter on this story: Charlotte Ryan in London at email@example.comTo contact the editors responsible for this story: Ven Ram at firstname.lastname@example.org, Neil Chatterjee, Scott HamiltonFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
(Bloomberg) -- The 14 sailors who died during a fire last week on a nuclear-powered Russian military submarine prevented a “planetary catastrophe,” a top naval officer said at their funeral, according to media reports.Captain Sergei Pavlov, an aide to the commander of Russia’s navy, praised the heroism of the men, who died as they battled to stop the fire from spreading in the submersible.“With their lives, they saved the lives of their colleagues, saved the vessel and prevented a planetary catastrophe,” he said at the funeral Sunday attended by the navy chief according to the Fontanka news service.Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov said he wasn’t aware of the official’s comments but said there was no indication the incident posed a broader threat. “As for the reactor, there are no problems with that,” he said on a conference call.Russia broke three days of secrecy July 4 and confirmed that the stricken underwater research vessel was nuclear-powered. Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu told President Vladimir Putin in a meeting shown on state TV that the nuclear reactor on board the vessel had been completely sealed off.‘Absolutely Classified’Russian authorities had previously refused to say whether the country’s worst naval incident in more than a decade involved a nuclear-powered vessel. They have also refused to say what type of craft was involved, with the Kremlin calling the information “absolutely classified.” Neighboring Norway contacted Russia for more details though it said it hadn’t detected any increased radiation levels.The vessel is linked to a secret nuclear-submarine project known as Losharik, RBC news website reported. Russia said the sailors died from smoke inhalation after the fire started while the deep-water submersible was exploring the sea bed in its territorial waters. The craft was later taken to the Russian Northern Fleet’s Severomorsk base on the Barents Sea coast.The fire was Russia’s most serious naval incident since 20 people died on a Nerpa nuclear submarine in 2008. The Losharik submarine can operate at a depth of 6,000 meters (20,000 feet), according to RBC. The craft reportedly was used to target undersea communications and other cables.Russia’s worst post-Soviet naval disaster occurred early in Putin’s presidency, in August 2000, when 118 crew died on the Kursk nuclear submarine that sank in the Barents Sea after an explosion. The authorities were also accused of a cover-up.To contact the reporters on this story: Henry Meyer in Moscow at email@example.com;Stepan Kravchenko in Moscow at firstname.lastname@example.orgTo contact the editors responsible for this story: Gregory L. White at email@example.com, Natasha DoffFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
We at Insider Monkey have gone over 738 13F filings that hedge funds and famous value investors are required to file by the SEC. The 13F filings show the funds' and investors' portfolio positions as of March 31st. In this article we look at what those investors think of Royal Bank of Canada (NYSE:RY). Royal […]
TORONTO , July 5, 2019 /CNW/ - Real Estate Asset Liquidity Trust (the "Trust") announced today that it has applied to the Ontario Securities Commission (the "OSC"), as principal regulator, for a decision that it has ceased to be a reporting issuer in all provinces of Canada . As of today's date, the Trust has eight series of mortgage pass-through certificates evidencing undivided co-ownership interests in various categories of commercial and multifamily mortgages, hypothecs and other charges on real or immovable property situated in Canada ("Certificates") outstanding (details of which are provided in Schedule "A"), all of which were offered on a private placement basis to eligible investors in Canada and the United States . The Trust no longer has any Certificates outstanding that were issued publicly in Canada .
RBC Global Asset Management Inc. announces June sales results for RBC Funds, PH&N Funds and BlueBay Funds
(Bloomberg) -- Russia broke days of secrecy and confirmed that a submersible research vessel on which a fire broke out that killed 14 sailors is nuclear-powered.The nuclear reactor on board the vessel is “completely sealed off,” Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu told President Vladimir Putin in a meeting shown on state TV on Thursday. Crew members “took all the necessary measures to protect the power plant, it’s fully operational,” Shoigu said.The fatal fire on Monday began in the submersible’s battery compartment, and the vessel will be repaired and returned to service fairly quickly, Shoigu said.Russian authorities had previously refused to say whether the country’s worst naval incident in more than a decade involved a nuclear-powered vessel. They have also refused to say what type of craft was involved, with Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov calling the information “absolutely classified.” Neighboring Norway contacted Russia for more details though it said it hadn’t detected any increased radiation levels.Secret ProjectThe vessel is linked to a secret nuclear submarine project known as Losharik, RBC news website reported, citing a person it didn’t identify. Russia said the sailors died from smoke inhalation after the fire started while the deep-water submersible was exploring the sea bed in its territorial waters. The craft was later taken to the Russian Northern Fleet’s Severomorsk base on the Barents Sea coast.Putin described it as an “unusual vessel” on Tuesday, adding that the victims included seven captains first rank and two decorated Heroes of Russia.The fire was Russia’s most serious naval incident since 20 people died on a Nerpa nuclear submarine in 2008. The Losharik submarine can operate at a depth of 6,000 meters (20,000 feet), according to RBC. The submarine has a titanium housing and had been used for research on the continental shelf, Izvestia newspaper reported in 2012.Russia’s worst post-Soviet naval disaster occurred early in Putin’s presidency, in August 2000, when 118 crew died on the Kursk nuclear submarine that sank in the Barents Sea after an explosion.To contact the reporter on this story: Henry Meyer in Moscow at firstname.lastname@example.orgTo contact the editors responsible for this story: Gregory L. White at email@example.com, Henry Meyer, Tony HalpinFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
(Bloomberg) -- Gold held its rally on a cocktail of positive drivers including weak macroeconomic data, sinking Treasury yields and expectations for fresh easing from the U.S. Federal Reserve.Bullion held above $1,400 an ounce and rose to the highest since May 2013 ahead of a U.S. holiday Thursday. Donald Trump has tapped two economists to the Fed’s board who are both seen as likely to support the president’s call for lower interest rates. Meanwhile, weaker than expected U.S. payrolls and service industry data overshadowed a decline in jobless claims.“The longer-term picture looks positive for gold,” Georgette Boele, coordinator of FX and precious metals strategy at ABN Amro Bank NV, told Bloomberg Television. Still, she suggested prices are probably overshooting at the moment. “The market has been too aggressive pricing in rate cuts” both from the Fed and other central banks, she said.Gold traded at a six-year high as simmering geopolitical and trade tensions increase demand for havens. Earlier in the week, the metal was boosted by a run of weaker manufacturing activity from Asia and Europe, similar data from the U.S that disappointed investors, and tariffs against a longer list of European goods.“What’s important is the European central banks all seem to be pretty dovish all of a sudden,” George Gero, a managing director at RBC Wealth Management, said by phone. That along with Trump’s dovish Fed picks and the weaker payrolls data, all amplify safe-haven demand for gold, he said.Trump is “trying to shift the balance on the FOMC to super dove,” said Stephen Innes at Vanguard Markets Pte, referring to the rate-setting Federal Open Market Committee. Both picks require Senate confirmation. Investors will be watching jobs data on Friday for more clues on Fed’s moves this month.Gold futures climbed as much as 2.3% in early trading before paring gains and settling hire at $1,420.90 at 1:30 p.m. on the Comex in New York. A gauge of the dollar held Tuesday’s losses, while Treasury yields sank to the lowest since November 2016. Holdings in gold-backed exchange-traded funds snapped 14 days of gains Tuesday, but are still near the highest since 2013.Gold prices trading above $1,400 again suggest that demand remains strong, said Howie Lee, an economist at Oversea-Chinese Banking Corp. in Singapore. “It’s a rollback to the yesteryears of loose monetary policies, which whetted the appetite of gold bulls consistently.”In other precious metals, silver gained on the Comex, while platinum and palladium gained on the New York Mercantile Exchange.\--With assistance from Justina Vasquez and Liezel Hill.To contact the reporters on this story: Ranjeetha Pakiam in Singapore at firstname.lastname@example.org;Elena Mazneva in London at email@example.comTo contact the editors responsible for this story: Lynn Thomasson at firstname.lastname@example.org, Steven Frank, Pratish NarayananFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
(Bloomberg) -- The latest data on semiconductor sales is pointing to stabilization in the industry, suggesting that months of weakness and tepid demand could be nearing an end, analysts said on Monday.According to the Semiconductor Industry Association, total monthly sales came in at $33 billion in May, up 7.1% from April. While the May data represented a year-over-year decline of 14.5%, it also represented a moderation from the 17.7% drop in April.“While the industry is still working through a cycle, the y/y declines appear to be decelerating,” wrote Mitch Steves, an analyst at RBC Capital Markets. “Given that forecasts were cut during a period where sentiment was heavily negative, we think there is upside bias to the numbers expected for 2019/2020.”The data comes at a time when analysts have been concerned about the prospects for the industry in the second half of the year, especially since the Philadelphia Semiconductor Index is within 7% of record levels. A number of companies, notably Broadcom Inc. and Micron Technology Inc., have issued cautious outlooks in recent weeks.Morgan Stanley wrote that the data pointed to “some signs of life” after “an exceptionally weak April,” and noted that sales -- along with the product categories of micro, logic and memory chips -- came in ahead of its expectations. However, analyst Joseph Moore maintained his cautious view on the sector, seeing “very challenging industry conditions” despite the data.The data was also above Citi’s estimate, according to analyst Christopher Danely, who raised his full-year semiconductor sales forecast to $413.3 billion from $408.2 billion. The outlook represents a full-year decline of 12%, compared with a previous view of down 13%.The Philadelphia Semiconductor Index rose as much as 5% on Monday, though it last traded up 2% on the day. The day’s rally came as the U.S. and China declared a truce in their trade war over the weekend; President Donald Trump also said he would delay trade restrictions against Huawei Technologies Co., a major customer to a number of chipmakers.To contact the reporter on this story: Ryan Vlastelica in New York at email@example.comTo contact the editors responsible for this story: Catherine Larkin at firstname.lastname@example.org, Steven Fromm, Morwenna ConiamFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
(Bloomberg) -- Traders who expected the Group-of-20 meeting to lift the grim mood in bond markets faced disappointment Monday as fresh signs of strain in the global economy drove yields lower in Europe and sustained bets on Federal Reserve interest-rate cuts.German benchmark yields plumbed new lows, although the rally in Europe favored the riskier markets, while U.K. yields sank back to 2016 levels. The U.S. 10-year is scraping 2%, and futures are still close to pricing in 75 basis points of rate cuts this year by the Federal Reserve. It seems rate markets have barely registered the trade truce between the U.S. and China, or the supposed easing of geopolitical tensions after the American president strolled into North Korea.Having transcended the risk of a worst-case scenario at the G-20 gathering, bonds are fixated on monetary policy. In Europe, that’s the latest hints of action from European Central Bank officials to boost inflation. In the U.S., the key is whether the Fed will deliver the rate cut that markets are banking on this month. Traders are looking to Friday’s U.S. jobs report, and another disappointing number could raise the odds of a half-point move in July. After all, the trade dispute with China is far from being resolved, and the global economic landscape is still rocky.The Treasuries “market is holding those 2% levels, waiting to see what the Fed’s going to do at the July meeting,” said Tom Garretson, U.S. fixed-income strategist at RBC Wealth Management.Manufacturing surveys provided the latest cause for concern. While the U.S. sector is holding up, a drop in the new-orders index is clouding the outlook. Chinese manufacturing contracted in June, the euro-area’s did so at a faster clip, and the U.K.’s reading was the lowest since 2013.The German benchmark yield has pushed further below zero, at -36 basis points, and the U.K. 10-year is around multi-year lows at about 81 basis points. Futures markets are still doing a robust trade in rate-cut hedges, with positions ramping up in eurodollars. And while overnight index swaps have pared positioning slightly, they still imply around 32 basis points of cuts this month.These latest moves demonstrate the gravitational pull that weak inflation and negative interest rates continue to exert in global markets.“The rally is more evidence of what happens when core and semi-core markets become negative yielding in 10-year-and-longer maturities,” said Peter Chatwell, head of European rates strategy at Mizuho International Plc.\--With assistance from John Ainger and Edward Bolingbroke.To contact the reporter on this story: Emily Barrett in New York at email@example.comTo contact the editors responsible for this story: Benjamin Purvis at firstname.lastname@example.org, Mark TannenbaumFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
(Bloomberg) -- Get up to speed on what’s moving markets. Here are the five things you need to know to start your day.To hold a view on asset prices in 2019 is to hold a view on trade. No issue can claim a greater market influence, and few are more divisive. To mark a seminal event in the saga, this weekend’s Group of 20 summit in Osaka, Japan, Bloomberg asked writers from its Markets Live blog -- Singapore-based Mark Cudmore and Andrew Cinko in Princeton, New Jersey -- to state opposing views on the outcome.Bear Case - CudmoreUnless the U.S. and China reach a grand bargain that sees global trade blossom again, it will be apparent in less than a year that this was the weekend that foretold the bull market’s doom. A truce that maintains the current level of tariffs will likely be insufficient to turn the rapidly deteriorating economic outlook. And don’t count on the Fed to save the day either.In three days we are likely to see the JPMorgan global manufacturing PMI slide further into contraction territory, according to last week’s preliminary PMI readings. It has fallen for 13 months.It’s a full-blown global theme: Data on trade and manufacturing continue to shock. The Bloomberg Economic Surprise index for the U.S. has been negative all year. The equivalent for the euro area has been negative for nine months.And, yet, economists haven’t changed their forecasts for global growth since the trade war escalated in May. Work that one out: The data pre-tariffs consistently came in below expectations, and then the world’s two largest economies imposed a bunch of tariffs. And yet the consensus expectation for 2019 world GDP growth is unmoved since April.What gives? Some would say that economists are in denial and hoping the trade war is all a bad dream. It may be fairer to acknowledge the difficulties of their profession. They don’t want to slash economic forecasts ahead of the G20, only to be compelled to upgrade them again in July if the U.S. and China achieve a deal.That’s why this bearish economic prognosis may soon turn into a markets one. While there’s optimism that this weekend’s Trump-Xi meeting will provide the breakthrough, evidence doesn’t support the perspective. A narrative among U.S. investors is that some trade deal will eventually be reached, because Trump will want one to boost the stock market into election year. The problem with that is it overlooks that there are two parties to the negotiation and it’s the "other" side that may provide the larger roadblock.Since May, the communication on mainland China has shifted immeasurably. Previously, any tensions with the U.S. were played down. The picture is vastly different today. After talks broke down in May, the tense situation with the U.S. has almost been hyped up domestically, with frequent mainland media references to imperial aggression and a new Long March. There have been references to the mistakes of the treaties of the Opium War era -- signed between 1842 and 1860. There’s little reason to doubt the sincerity of China when it states that a trade deal can only be established when negotiated on equal terms. Such a scenario appears unlikely, which explains why China is preparing for sustained tensions via aggressive and targeted stimulus for its domestic economy.So, unless one believes that Trump will suddenly surrender his fight and abandon almost all demands on China, a trade deal seems very unlikely. At best, this weekend may bring a handshake, some statements of mutual respect and an expressed desire to reach a deal. In subsequent weeks, a gloomier reality will become apparent.And if you’re counting on the Fed to save stocks, you may want to check how well that strategy has worked in the past: It hasn’t. This century has provided two recessions -- both coinciding with periods when the S&P 500 gave up half its value. In September 2007, the Fed cut rates by 50 basis points and by another 25 in October; it didn’t prevent a U.S. recession in December. Likewise, the easing cycle that began in January 2001 didn’t stop the recession beginning in March 2001. And to make that point more worrying, the Fed was able to cut rates by at least 500 basis points each time to fight the downturn. With the benchmark rate at 2.5% today, it doesn’t have the luxury.So, as we approach the G-20 and its supposed status as the last potential savior, the words of Dante Alighieri should ring loudly in your ears: "Abandon Hope All Ye Who Enter Here."Bull Case - CinkoFor the less-apocalyptically minded, optimism boils down to one question: even without a grand bargain, where is the proof that the world economy is going over the edge into a recession?The war of words over trade may have gone from genteel to acerbic, but it has done so over the course of many months, giving everyone time to assess the many paths it may take and the potential costs involved. Has it affected manufacturing? Certainly. But not so much as to spur a swan dive. Output gently tumbling and even PMIs below 50 aren’t overly alarming. Is 2008 so long ago that we’ve forgotten the 20-point plunge in China’s PMI over the course of just seven months? No such Armageddon is currently seen in the data.And what of the hit to the economy? A 25% tariff on all Chinese goods imports amounts to “an additional tax on U.S. businesses/consumers of about $100 billion over year-ago levels (assuming no currency offset or substitution),” writes RBC economist Tom Porcelli in a note June 24. A 0.5% hit to the U.S. economy isn’t a rounding error, but it’s not a recession.Bears will say, it’s not the money, it’s the hit to consumer confidence caused when politicians can’t agree. It’s the wider hit to global stability. Those are points bulls and bears can agree on, but where we differ is in the damage done. Already there are numerous reports of supply chains moving to Thailand, Taiwan or Vietnam. Not to mention legal workarounds that will keep the cross-ocean shipments going.And corporate management teams, while not happy, have had the luxury of time to work up a plan of action should the tariffs become reality. Will that spell doom and gloom for corporate earnings? Highly doubtful given human ingenuity. A savings glut in the U.S. is hitting new highs. That’s money that can be used to absorb shocks and offset the cost of the tariffs.As for the Fed, past instances of futility aren’t relevant. Fine, its monetary levers are never enough once a recession is underway. But it’s far from clear the Fed is already behind the curve. A possible July move is correctly thought of as an “insurance” cut, to preempt panic. Data this week show the U.S. hasn’t hit a brick wall, but is merely getting rough around the edges. An interest-rate course adjustment, a la the mid-1990’s, may be all that’s needed to keep growth alive.Outside of the FOMC, the markets have already given a big boost to animal spirits. Financial conditions remain easy, unlike the dark days of December. Or for that matter 2015 and 2016.The old saying is that when the U.S. sneezes, the world catches a cold. It’s a good thing for the world that America has economic momentum, fat bank accounts and a resilient Fed -- no matter what comes out of Osaka this weekend.For more markets analysis, visit our Markets Live blog.To contact the reporters on this story: Mark Cudmore in Singapore at email@example.com;Andrew Cinko in New York at firstname.lastname@example.orgTo contact the editors responsible for this story: Eric J. Weiner at email@example.com, Chris NagiFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
(Bloomberg) -- For an OPEC+ meeting in which the key decision over an output-cut extension is supposedly “in the bag,” according to Saudi Arabia’s Energy Minister Khalid Al-Falih, Monday’s gathering in Vienna could be as closely watched as any during the three-year coalition.The Organization of Petroleum Exporting Countries and its allies convene next week to discuss extending a 1.2 million barrel-a-day cut into the second half. While the cartel’s three biggest members – Saudi Arabia, Iraq and the United Arab Emirates – are all willing to continue the policy of reduced production, Russia remains circumspect, prompting questions over potential changes to policy.Meanwhile, myriad uncertainties cloud the oil market outlook. An ongoing U.S. and China trade spat is stoking fears over demand growth, while escalating tension between the U.S. and Iran has heightened geopolitical risk in the world’s biggest oil-producing region.Following are the latest positions of most of OPEC, plus non-OPEC members Russia and Azerbaijan. The respective shares of supply are based on May output. Estimates for the price each member need to balance its 2019 budget are from the International Monetary Fund, unless otherwise specified.AlgeriaPrice needed: $116.40Share of OPEC production: 3.3%Algeria’s output has remained relatively stable at around 1 million barrels a day, according to Bloomberg data. Political uncertainty is emerging, however, with a presidential election and transition of power pending in 2019, following the April resignation of aging President Abdelaziz Bouteflika after two decades.AngolaPrice needed: $80 (RBC)Share of OPEC production: 4.8%Underinvestment and a natural decline in maturing oil fields has resulted in Angola’s output falling by about 350,000 barrels a day over the last four years, averaging 1.44 million in 2019. That’s the lowest in more than a decade and less than OPEC’s assigned quota of 1.48 million barrels a day, meaning it is likely to back an extension.AzerbaijanPrice needed: $50.60Saudi Arabia got a fillip last week when Azerbaijan, one of OPEC’s biggest allies, said it supports an extension of the production-cuts deal into the second half. “It would be right to extend the same regime” unless something happens to change the current situation, Azeri Energy Minister Parviz Shahbazov told reporters. Kazakhstan, its Caspian Sea neighbor, also backs an extension.IranPrice needed: $125.60Share of OPEC production: 7.7%Iran’s crude output and exports tumbled after U.S. President Donald Trump blocked oil sales in May. Observed crude flows dropped to 190,000 barrels a day in the first half of June, less than a tenth of the volume shipped in early 2018, according to Bloomberg data. Production is now at the lowest level since the 1980s.IraqPrice needed: $64.30Share of OPEC production: 15.5%Despite a poor record of adherence to the deal (implementing just 26% of its pledged cuts on average in 2017 and 2018) Iraq’s Oil Minister Thamir Ghadhban reaffirmed his commitment to the OPEC+ production cuts. Ghadhban had previously said that Iraq, OPEC’s second-largest producer, sees the group and its allies extending production cuts “at least” on current terms without “serious difficulties.” Crude output has held steady above 4.5 million barrels a day in 2019.KuwaitPrice needed: $48.80Share of OPEC production: 8.9%Kuwait will support OPEC’s oil-production cuts until the end of 2019 when the group meets in Vienna next week, Kuwait Oil Minister Khaled Al-Fadhel told state-run Kuwait News Agency. The country has been in full compliance with output cuts. It curbed more than was pledged in May, trimming output by 99,000 barrels a day, against a required 85,000 barrels a day.LibyaPrice needed: $71.30Share of OPEC production: 4.1%Exempt from cuts, Libya’s production reached 1.25 million barrels a day in May, a six-year high. Threats to production remain, however, as Libya’s eastern commander, Khalifa Haftar, in June vowed to press ahead with an offensive on the capital until militias there are disbanded. He also intends to dissolve the UN-backed government currently headed by Prime Minister Fayez Al-Sarraj.NigeriaPrice needed: $150 (RBC)Share of OPEC production: 6.2%Nigeria’s production exceeded 1.8 million barrels in 2019 thanks to the ramp up at Total’s Egina offshore field. This means the country has cut output by less than pledged. In May it only reduced output by 5,000 barrels a day (or 9%), against a pledged 53,000, making it the least compliant of all 21 nations signed up to the deal.RussiaPrice needed: $40 (Energy Ministry)Russia has spent 2019 inching toward its output commitments, finally reaching its target in May. It was aided in its task with the discovery of contaminated crude in its main export pipeline to Europe. Non-OPEC’s largest producer has maintained a wait-and-see policy regarding an extension. “We have certain differences in opinion regarding the fair price” compared with Saudi Arabia, President Vladimir Putin told reporters in June. “$60-65 a barrel suits us just fine” because Russia’s budget is based on $40 crude, he said.Saudi ArabiaPrice needed: $85.40Share of OPEC production: 32.9%Energy Minister Al-Falih is confident a deal will be done, with the only question being whether there needs to be an adjustment to the pledged cut level in the second half. Saudi Arabia agreed to reduce production by 322,000 barrels a day for the first half of this year. In May, it cut by an average of 943,000 daily barrels instead, achieving a record 293% compliance rate.U.A.E.Price needed: $65Share of OPEC production: 10.1%Energy Minister Suhail Al-Mazrouei is “not expecting a very difficult process in approving the extension,” with discussions at the July meeting set to focus on the duration of the agreement, he said in late June. The country is still targeting higher crude output in the longer term, with the chief executive officer of Abu Dhabi National Oil Co., Sultan Ahmed Al-Jaber, saying it will increase oil output capacity to 4 million barrels a day by 2020, and 5 million barrels a day by 2030.VenezuelaPrice needed: $276 (RBC)Share of OPEC production: 2.7%Crippling economic sanctions and years of mismanagement means production continued to decline this year, plunging 34% to May. This follows a 28% drop in 2018. Output for May was at 810,000 barrels a day, the lowest since January 2003, according to Bloomberg data.To contact the reporter on this story: Christopher Sell in London at firstname.lastname@example.orgTo contact the editor responsible for this story: James Herron at email@example.comFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
(Bloomberg) -- Investors may be underestimating the risks posed by the possibility that the Democrats, particularly Senator Elizabeth Warren, will win in 2020, some analysts said in commentary ahead of Thursday night’s second debate.Analysts also noted that big banks managed to avoid the spotlight during Wednesday’s first debate, but that may change when Senator Bernie Sanders takes the stage.Stocks across the board rose in mid-day Thursday trading, helped by optimism about trade talks at the upcoming G-20 summit. Financials were the best-performing S&P 500 sector, with big banks including Bank of America Corp., Citigroup Inc., Wells Fargo & Co. and Morgan Stanley outperforming.Here’s a sample of the latest commentary:RBC, Lori CalvasinaU.S. equity investors may have “gotten a bit complacent on the 2020 election” in terms of how the Democratic nomination will resolve, Calvasina wrote in a note.A June RBC survey showed most investors think that Joe Biden will win the nomination, she said. A Biden general election victory would be viewed as neutral for the stock market, but most survey respondents said any other Democrat winning would be negative, she said. The strategist added that Biden has been fading in the polls, while Warren has been gaining.RBC continues to view the 2020 election as a “key risk factor” for stocks in the year ahead, with most major S&P 500 sectors having policy risk if Democrats sweep.AGF Investments, Greg ValliereElizabeth Warren was “solid, passionate, wonky,” during Tuesday’s debate, Valliere wrote. He said that Warren is clearly still a top-tier candidate, and poses “an enormous threat to the financial services industry.”Wednesday night’s big winner was Donald Trump, he said, as the debate reinforced Trump’s “argument that the Democrats are moving toward a socialist agenda.” That may give Biden an opening, Valliere said. If Biden can avoid gaffes on Thursday, he may “emerge as the affable moderate who can win Pennsylvania and Michigan.” If he stumbles, the Democrats’ “sharp veer to the left would gain momentum, and Trump would become the clear general election favorite.”Height Capital Markets, Clayton AllenHeight expects Thursday’s debate round will be “more interesting” than Wednesday’s, with a “match-up between the remaining top candidates opening the possibility for much more significant policy announcements.” That may impact markets, he said, flagging the response to Warren’s private prison proposal as a recent example.Compass Point, Isaac BoltanskyThe first debate reinforced the “belief that financial services are a secondary issue in the Democratic presidential race,” as Wall Street themes were generally absent, Boltansky wrote in a note.Democrats seem “primarily focused on corporate consolidation, tax policy, health care, and economic inequality,” Boltansky said. He expects “a more pronounced rift between progressives and moderates in due time, which could be on display as early as this evening with Biden on the stage.”Raymond James, Ed MillsDemocratic candidates didn’t focus on attacking “Wall Street” or big banks during their first debate, though that may change when Sanders takes the stage, Mills wrote in a note.Mills saw “healthcare policy, inequity in the tax code, antitrust scrutiny, climate issues, and geopolitical challenges” as Wednesday night’s leading topics, with China regarded as a consensus geopolitical challenge. Democrats will likely look to capitalize on the unpopularity of the new tax code, with tax changes as a probable policy goal if they win.To contact the reporter on this story: Felice Maranz in New York at firstname.lastname@example.orgTo contact the editors responsible for this story: Catherine Larkin at email@example.com, Steven Fromm, Janet FreundFor more articles like this, please visit us at bloomberg.com©2019 Bloomberg L.P.
L'accessibilité à la propriété s'améliore au Canada, même si Toronto et Vancouver demeurent des « obstacles insurmontables » pour la plupart des acheteurs : Services économiques RBC
TORONTO , June 27, 2019 /CNW/ - Housing affordability has improved for the second straight-quarter in Canada in the first quarter of 2019, according to the latest RBC Economics Housing Trends and Affordability Report. At its core, much of the improved affordability can be traced to "policy-engineered market downturns" that have helped lower property values in a number of Canadian markets.