Wed, May 23, 2012, 7:02 PM EDT - U.S. Markets closed

Discover Yahoo! With Your Friends

Explore news, videos, and much more based on what your friends are reading and watching. Publish your own activity and retain full control.

To get started, first

YOUR FRIENDS' ACTIVITY

    James Rickards’ “Four Horsemen of the Dollar Apocalypse”

    Follow The Daily Ticker on Facebook here!

    In recent years, it's become conventional knowledge that the dollar's status as the world's reserve currency is under threat. In his new book, Currency Wars: The Making of the Next Global Crisis, James Rickards makes a compelling case for not just why the dollar will lose its reserve status, but how.

    In the book and the accompanying video, Rickards, a veteran investment banker and hedge fund manager, describes four different scenarios by which the dollar will lose its reserve status, which he calls the "Four Horsemen of the Dollar Apocalypse":

    The "Kumbaya Approach": Since 2000, the dollar has fallen from 70% of the world's currency reserves to 60% today as nations diversify their holdings into euros, gold, yuan and other dollar alternatives. U.C. Berkeley professor Barry Eichengreen, among others, argue this diversification trend will continue until we live in a world of multiple reserve currencies. But Rickards says this "Kumbaya approach" is destined to fail because without a gold standard it will be "a race to the bottom" as nations seek competitive devaluations. (See: The Next Global Crisis: Currency Wars Have Already Begun, Rickards Says)

    IMF as Global Central Bank: Since 1969, the IMF has had the ability to print Special Drawing Rights (SDRs), which nations can use to maintain a portion of their currency reserves. Although not available for use in private transactions (yet), Rickards notes SDRs can be used by nations to settle trade balances with other nations. "The SDR is world money, controlled by the IMF, backed by nothing and printed at will," he writes. The 2008 financial crisis led to a "new concerted effort by the G20 and IMF to promote the use of SDRs as the global reserve currency alternative to the dollar."

    If and when the world loses faith in the dollar, expect the G20 and IMF to redouble efforts to make SDRs the globe's new reserve currency, Rickards says.

    Go for Gold: Like many others, Rickards advocates a return to the gold standard. (See: Bye-Bye Bernanke? The Case for the Gold Standard)

    Unlike most fans of the gold standard, he actually has a plan to return to a gold-backed monetary system without causing major upheaval to the global financial system by addressing three key questions: What's the definition of 'money' (M1, M2, etc.)? What percentage of the money supply should be backed by gold? Will the U.S. act alone or in concert with other nations? "Answer those questions and it's really just 8th-grade math" to figure out what the implied price of gold will be, he says.

    While arguing it has the "best chance of success," a return to the gold-standard is the "least likely" of the four scenarios, Rickards says. "The power elites hate [the gold standard] because it takes away their ability to print money; when you print money you rig the game, you control the game."

    Chaos: Given myriad challenges to the three scenarios above, a "sudden, systemic collapse" of the dollar-based financial system is the "most likely" outcome, Rickards says, predicting the ensuing chaos will be "much bigger" than the 1987 crash or the crisis of 2008.

    Faced with such upheaval, Rickards suggests the U.S. will invoke the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1997, which gives the President "near dictatorial powers to respond to a national emergency."

    In addition to seizing all foreign gold on U.S. soil, Rickards envisions the President closing the stock exchanges, suspending trading of U.S. Treasuries by foreigners and prohibiting exports of gold from the U.S., among other draconian steps.

    In the aftermath, the U.S. would control about 70% of the world's gold system and all us to "reboot the system and have a new gold-backed Bretton Woods," he says. "That would be a good scenario if we got their by consent and by multilateral action...but to do it on an emergency basis in the face of a collapse in confidence in paper currencies; it would solve the problem but it would not be a good scenario."

    Aaron Task is the host of The Daily Ticker. You can follow him on Twitter at @aarontask or email him at altask@yahoo.com

    Yahoo! Poll

    Will Congress get anything accomplished before the November elections?

    Loading...
    Poll Choice Options
    • Yes
    • No
     

    65 comments

    • Tabby  •  5 months ago
      Hmmm, Article I, section 10 of the Constitution of the United States states "No State shall...; make any Thing but gold and silver Coin a Tender in Payment of Debs;"

      So according to the Constitution of the United States the states are not to recognize anything but gold and silver coin as legal tender and therefore the Federal Reserve Note is unconstitutional. I would support returning back to the original definition of the dollar which was the Spanish dollar of the day, or pieces of eight (that is why two bits is 1/4 of a dollar or 25cents) or “of the value of a Spanish milled dollar as the same is now current, and to contain three hundred and seventy-one grains and four sixteenth parts of a grain of pure . . . silver.” and the $10 gold coin as "the weight of fine gold equivalent in the marketplace to 3,712.50 grains of fine silver" (Coinage Act of 1792)

      This was the original standard that the Founding Era Congress set. They insisted on coin money instead of paper money because they were aware of the failure of the Chines fiat Flying paper money which almost caused the collapse of the Chinese Empire because of inflation.

      So according to the Constitution of the United States the only money that is to be held as legal tender is gold and silver coin money and therefore the Federal Reserve Note in unconstitutional and the Federal Reserve Act should be ruled as unconstitutional. Transition to Constitutional money should be placed in place.
      • Tabby 5 months ago
        The only reason a return to a Constitutional monetary policy would cause deflation is because the Federal Reserve Note is actually worthless. Prices would return to there true market value based on the standards for the dollar that the Founding generation set and we should follow their wisdom. Things would "cost" less but the money you receive would actually be worth something of value. Inflation was none existent for much of our history up until 1913 when the Federal Reserve System was created. Then the value of the dollar has collapsed since then, mostly since 1971, and one 2011 dollar is worth 1/20th of a dollar in 1913 . So just returning to the 1913 standard (one dollar was worth 1/32nd of an ounce of gold) the dollar would then regain 80% of it's value and gold would return to it's 1913 price of $32/ounce. Gold would not loose it's value, the dollar would just regain it's.

        Gold and silver is really worth about what it always has. If you take the current price of gold and silver and use that as the standard of comparison, then there would be very little actual inflation in the cost of goods and services. The only reason for inflation is the dollar is really only worth the paper it's printed on. every country in history that has devalued it's money has collapsed unless they changed back to hard currency, i.e. gold, silver, and copper.

        This would require setting up an exchange system of disposing of all of the fiat dollars, at the cost of the Federal Reserve which should be abolished and all assets ceased. Article I, Section 8, (paragraph 4) states "The Congress shall have Power...To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin...". So only Congress has the power to, notice, coin money, not print it, and regulate it's value...how does Congress regulate the value of the Federal Reserve Note when it has no power over the Federal Reserve??
      • Tabby 5 months ago
        And I'm actually old enough to have known oldsters who still had silver certificates, which was the last of the real money. A silver certificate could have been redeemed for it's face value in silver coin. So if you had a $10 silver certificate you could exchange it for 10 silver (80%silver and 20% copper, or coinage silver) dollar coins. The actual value of the dollar was set as a weight of fine silver or gold or 99.99% silver or gold
    • SRM-03  •  6 months ago
      There are only TWO 'Horsemen of the Dollar Apocalypse:' Greed and lack responsible and moral leadership!!
    • Fibo Loki  •  6 months ago
      But they want the IMF as the World Bank, don't they...isn't that plan all along. Like, I'm shocked - NOT! They don't even make the enslavement challenging to figure out anymore.
    • Mike  •  6 months ago
      Well, if you want to start WW3, that'd be how Id go about it.
      • tony88 6 months ago
        Fortunately I doubt anyone could afford it
    • Tina  •  6 months ago
      Getting the U.S. off the gold standard. Nixon did that to keep France and Switzerland from emptying our vaults of all the gold but like the old saying goes, for every action there is a reaction. In his defense, he wasn't the first country to leave the gold standard, Germany was one of the first and it proved to be a boon for their economy of course. The fact that the central banks worldwide purchased a record amount of gold just this past Sept, a 40 year high to be exact, is telling. I understand the total amount will be 450 tonnes by the end of the year. Did anyone see that the International Monetary Fund Europe chief has just resigned, wonder why? The fact that Spain just slipped down the rabbit hole to the tune of 7% bond interest is scary, they can't save Spain, it's just too big.
      • ANONYMOUS 6 months ago
        the reason nixon did take us off the gold standard was that all the gold in Fort Knox was sold out from under at $35 an ounce prior to his taking us off the gold standard.Meanwhile the price was spiking above $80.The rich just wanted to keep raising the price on their new found wealth!
      • buffettpuppett 6 months ago
        Gold is ugly, I like green
      • Tina 6 months ago
        Anonymous? I fear you may be correct in your assumptions, what does that say about what is ahead for all of us?
    • Amerika  •  6 months ago
      IMF, Federal Reserve, ECB, US Congress. They don't care about you. They have robbed you, they will continue to rob you, they will steal all the wealth by money printing. The bank/fiat money is how the control you. You are not on the list of recipients for freshly counterfeited money.
    • Scott  •  6 months ago
      The best security is simply to maintain to maintain physical gold "off the books".

      A simple "gold-backed" currency does nothing. Having paper currency that "can be redeemed for a certain amount of gold" is insufficient becaue it relies on fiat power to maintain that covenant.

      Actual physical gold must be integrated into the units of the currency - even then it is not foolproof because the government may remove the currency from circulation.
      • Amerika 6 months ago
        What about digital gold money? Gold on debit cards.
      • Sunny 6 months ago
        True free market currency - eg. Bitcoin.
    • Amerika  •  6 months ago
      The central banking cartels have already robbed the citizens of much of their wealth, so citizens have less federal reserve notes to purchase gold (or the purchasing power of dollars doesn't buy as much), while the central banking gangsters can buy all the gold they want, simply by counterfeiting money, and again, robbing you blind.
    • Clyde  •  6 months ago
      Naw.... how about an oil standard for currency? Man..... if they done that ya, better believe they would start pumping ours.....
    • Bango-ango  •  6 months ago
      I've been following Rickards since 2008, he has the insider knowledge to know what he's talking about. I've read the first chapter of his book and it's VERY good. A real page turner and all based on truth, not fiction. We have to understand where we've been to know where we are headed. Rickards helps us weed out the chaff from the nuggets of real wheat. Thanks, Jim for being so honest...it's refreshing.
    • Murmillion  •  6 months ago
      He forgot to mention that the US could also rely on its military to "secure" resources currently owned by other countries....
    • Ultra-Humanite  •  6 months ago
      I love how having a plan apparently means asking 3 questions you don't have the answers to.
    • First L  •  6 months ago
      Gold is a great investment, if you are all stocked up on food, water, gas, guns and ground
    • Kelly P  •  6 months ago
      He's 100% right about the gold standard favoring the 99%
    • Thomas  •  6 months ago
      There will be no sudden collapse, it will be long slow death. Keep on kicking that can!!! :-)
    • Bob  •  6 months ago
      The international banksters have conspired to destroy all of the economies of the world so they can "save" us by creating a world bank which they control. Then they can print all the money they want.

      Give me control of a nation's money and I care not who makes her laws.
      Mayer Amschel Rothschild
    • Easy Street  •  6 months ago
      On the gold standard. Already looking at only 20% backing. Shucks, we can spend that in no time. Nixon saw our gold going away, so off the gold standard. It doesn't matter how much gold you have, if you are not living within your means. The ongoing currency wars are the reason the USA keeps on losing. We let it go on to get cheap inports.
    • Sean  •  6 months ago
      I like this guy... A+
    • oldanddon'tcareanymor ...  •  6 months ago
      I cannot actually believe that a commentator at Yahoo Finance would have the good sense to read Rickard's book. What he will end up doing with those insights is another story.
    • Jack  •  6 months ago
      Of course, under these scenarios, the Bankers and their cronies remain at the top of the food chain............#$%$ the masses, once again.

    FOLLOW THE DAILY TICKER

    The Daily Ticker covers the most important business stories of the day -- the economy, investing, corporate leadership and politics. The Daily Ticker picks up where Tech Ticker left off and is hosted by Aaron Task, Henry Blodget and Daniel Gross. Often serious, sometimes irreverent and always interesting, The Daily Ticker gives viewers a unique take on the business world's most crucial stories.

    Subscribe and RSS

    [X]

    How to subscribe

    Roll over each section to subscribe using Add to My Yahoo! or RSS Feed feeds.

    Yahoo! News offers dozens of RSS feeds you can read in My Yahoo! or using third-party RSS news reader software. Click here to find out more about RSS and how you can use it with Yahoo! News.
     
    Recent Quotes
    Symbol Price Change % Chg 
    Your most recently viewed tickers will automatically show up here if you type a ticker in the "Enter symbol/company" at the bottom of this module.
    You need to enable your browser cookies to view your most recent quotes.
     
    Sign-in to view quotes in your portfolios.