Has VIX changed as a market indicator?

There has been a lot of talk recently about whether the VIX is the tail wagging the dog, and I thought I would chime in on the subject.

The CBOE Volatility Index has clearly seen a lot of strange action lately. February had the most days with the S&P 500 and the VIX climbing together, as opposed to their usually inverse relationship. And then there was the volume explosion in the VelocityShares Daily 2x VIX Short-Term Futures (NYSEArca:TVIX) exchange-traded note, which stopped creating new units.

We have seen huge swings in the spot VIX, as it first dropped below 15 and then below 14--if briefly--for the first time in five years.

What does this all mean? Let's break it down backward.

Basically, the VIX is based on a calculation that includes all options with a bid. If, for instance, a bid was pulled from an option higher of a higher strike, all the lower strikes are dropped from the calculation.

So as the bids were pulled and then replaced, the VIX swung wildly. The moves in the VIX, especially yesterday, are nicely explained by Jamie Tyrrell in our Volatility Sonar report.

At the same time, however, the volatilities of options that were actually trading were not changing, and the VIX futures weren't moving much either.

As I've always said, it's important to remember that the VIX is simply a statistic that can be moved by quirks--not the Holy Grail that some posit. This does not mean that it's without merit; its usefulness is most notable in relation to other measures of volatility, like the actual volatility of the SPX and the VIX futures.

But can we rely on the VIX futures anymore? Some say that the VIX-based exchange-traded funds and notes, such as the TVIX and the iPath S&P 500 VIX Short-Term Futures ETN (NYSEArca:VXX), are unduly influencing the VIX futures market. The VIX isn't tradable and all of those VIX-based products are based off the VIX futures.

We have seen very steep contango recently, with a big premium in the front-month VIX futures and increasing premiums all the way out in later expirations. So right now the VIX is at 15.45, but the March futures that expire next week are at 17.45, the April contracts are at 21.45, and the September futures are above 27.

The action in the exchange-traded products may be helping to drive that steep contango because they sell nearer-month futures and buy later-dated contracts. Some market observers contend that these funds and notes of own all of VIX futures.

But the TVIX stopped creating new units a while back. And while volume as taken off in the ProShares Ultra VIX Short-Term Futures ETF (NYSEArca:UVXY), another 2x short-term fund, it is still about 10 percent of the peak volume in the TVIX. Likewise, volume in the VXX has picked up but remains well off its highs.

Even so, on March 13 we saw more than 92,000 VIX futures trade, right around the levels from when the TVIX volume spiked higher. This pushed the total open interest in VIX futures to more than 308,000, which I believe is a record high, but the day-over-day change in open interest was only 11,000 contracts.

So it appears that the vast majority of the action in the VIX futures was intraday, and that doesn't strike me as hedging action of the firms running these VIX-based funds.

It used to be that steep contango in the VIX futures meant that smart money was betting on higher volatility in the near future, and they were usually right. But since 2008, and especially since the inception of the VIX exchange-traded products 2009, the steep contango has not necessarily preceded equity selloffs.

What all of this means is that volatility analysis is a dynamic process. A VIX of 15 doesn't mean anything in isolation. And the type of steep contango we have right now has really not been seen before, so it is impossible to draw any hard conclusions.

Much the same can be said for those increasingly popular VIX-based funds, which are still relatively new. They ultimately may reduce the volatility of the market, or they may increase it in times of stress.

(A version of this article appeared in optionMONSTER's What's the Trade? newsletter of March 14.)


More From optionMONSTER

Advertisement