How Did Tech Mahindra Limited’s (NSE:TECHM) 19.56% ROE Fare Against The Industry?

In this article:

With an ROE of 19.56%, Tech Mahindra Limited (NSEI:TECHM) outpaced its own industry which delivered a less exciting 12.96% over the past year. On the surface, this looks fantastic since we know that TECHM has made large profits from little equity capital; however, ROE doesn’t tell us if management have borrowed heavily to make this happen. In this article, we’ll closely examine some factors like financial leverage to evaluate the sustainability of TECHM’s ROE. See our latest analysis for Tech Mahindra

Breaking down ROE — the mother of all ratios

Return on Equity (ROE) weighs Tech Mahindra’s profit against the level of its shareholders’ equity. It essentially shows how much the company can generate in earnings given the amount of equity it has raised. In most cases, a higher ROE is preferred; however, there are many other factors we must consider prior to making any investment decisions.

Return on Equity = Net Profit ÷ Shareholders Equity

ROE is measured against cost of equity in order to determine the efficiency of Tech Mahindra’s equity capital deployed. Its cost of equity is 13.55%. Given a positive discrepancy of 6.02% between return and cost, this indicates that Tech Mahindra pays less for its capital than what it generates in return, which is a sign of capital efficiency. ROE can be broken down into three different ratios: net profit margin, asset turnover, and financial leverage. This is called the Dupont Formula:

Dupont Formula

ROE = profit margin × asset turnover × financial leverage

ROE = (annual net profit ÷ sales) × (sales ÷ assets) × (assets ÷ shareholders’ equity)

ROE = annual net profit ÷ shareholders’ equity

NSEI:TECHM Last Perf Jun 5th 18
NSEI:TECHM Last Perf Jun 5th 18

Essentially, profit margin shows how much money the company makes after paying for all its expenses. The other component, asset turnover, illustrates how much revenue Tech Mahindra can make from its asset base. And finally, financial leverage is simply how much of assets are funded by equity, which exhibits how sustainable the company’s capital structure is. Since ROE can be artificially increased through excessive borrowing, we should check Tech Mahindra’s historic debt-to-equity ratio. Currently the debt-to-equity ratio stands at a low 8.92%, which means its above-average ROE is driven by its ability to grow its profit without a significant debt burden.

NSEI:TECHM Historical Debt Jun 5th 18
NSEI:TECHM Historical Debt Jun 5th 18

Next Steps:

ROE is a simple yet informative ratio, illustrating the various components that each measure the quality of the overall stock. Tech Mahindra’s ROE is impressive relative to the industry average and also covers its cost of equity. ROE is not likely to be inflated by excessive debt funding, giving shareholders more conviction in the sustainability of high returns. ROE is a helpful signal, but it is definitely not sufficient on its own to make an investment decision.

For Tech Mahindra, I’ve compiled three pertinent aspects you should look at:

  1. Financial Health: Does it have a healthy balance sheet? Take a look at our free balance sheet analysis with six simple checks on key factors like leverage and risk.

  2. Valuation: What is Tech Mahindra worth today? Is the stock undervalued, even when its growth outlook is factored into its intrinsic value? The intrinsic value infographic in our free research report helps visualize whether Tech Mahindra is currently mispriced by the market.

  3. Other High-Growth Alternatives : Are there other high-growth stocks you could be holding instead of Tech Mahindra? Explore our interactive list of stocks with large growth potential to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing!


To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned.

Advertisement