Does Beijing Enterprises Water Group Limited’s (HKG:371) ROCE Reflect Well On The Business?

In this article:

Today we'll evaluate Beijing Enterprises Water Group Limited (HKG:371) to determine whether it could have potential as an investment idea. Specifically, we're going to calculate its Return On Capital Employed (ROCE), in the hopes of getting some insight into the business.

First up, we'll look at what ROCE is and how we calculate it. Next, we'll compare it to others in its industry. Then we'll determine how its current liabilities are affecting its ROCE.

Understanding Return On Capital Employed (ROCE)

ROCE is a metric for evaluating how much pre-tax income (in percentage terms) a company earns on the capital invested in its business. In general, businesses with a higher ROCE are usually better quality. In brief, it is a useful tool, but it is not without drawbacks. Renowned investment researcher Michael Mauboussin has suggested that a high ROCE can indicate that 'one dollar invested in the company generates value of more than one dollar'.

How Do You Calculate Return On Capital Employed?

Analysts use this formula to calculate return on capital employed:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets - Current Liabilities)

Or for Beijing Enterprises Water Group:

0.079 = HK$8.1b ÷ (HK$139b - HK$37b) (Based on the trailing twelve months to June 2019.)

So, Beijing Enterprises Water Group has an ROCE of 7.9%.

View our latest analysis for Beijing Enterprises Water Group

Is Beijing Enterprises Water Group's ROCE Good?

One way to assess ROCE is to compare similar companies. Using our data, Beijing Enterprises Water Group's ROCE appears to be around the 7.7% average of the Water Utilities industry. Separate from how Beijing Enterprises Water Group stacks up against its industry, its ROCE in absolute terms is mediocre; relative to the returns on government bonds. Investors may wish to consider higher-performing investments.

You can see in the image below how Beijing Enterprises Water Group's ROCE compares to its industry. Click to see more on past growth.

SEHK:371 Past Revenue and Net Income, February 24th 2020
SEHK:371 Past Revenue and Net Income, February 24th 2020

It is important to remember that ROCE shows past performance, and is not necessarily predictive. Companies in cyclical industries can be difficult to understand using ROCE, as returns typically look high during boom times, and low during busts. ROCE is only a point-in-time measure. Future performance is what matters, and you can see analyst predictions in our free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

Beijing Enterprises Water Group's Current Liabilities And Their Impact On Its ROCE

Short term (or current) liabilities, are things like supplier invoices, overdrafts, or tax bills that need to be paid within 12 months. Due to the way ROCE is calculated, a high level of current liabilities makes a company look as though it has less capital employed, and thus can (sometimes unfairly) boost the ROCE. To counteract this, we check if a company has high current liabilities, relative to its total assets.

Beijing Enterprises Water Group has total assets of HK$139b and current liabilities of HK$37b. As a result, its current liabilities are equal to approximately 27% of its total assets. This is a modest level of current liabilities, which would only have a small effect on ROCE.

Our Take On Beijing Enterprises Water Group's ROCE

If Beijing Enterprises Water Group continues to earn an uninspiring ROCE, there may be better places to invest. You might be able to find a better investment than Beijing Enterprises Water Group. If you want a selection of possible winners, check out this free list of interesting companies that trade on a P/E below 20 (but have proven they can grow earnings).

I will like Beijing Enterprises Water Group better if I see some big insider buys. While we wait, check out this free list of growing companies with considerable, recent, insider buying.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Thank you for reading.

Advertisement