Should We Worry About Guaranty Bancshares Inc’s (NASDAQ:GNTY) P/E Ratio?

In this article:

This article is written for those who want to get better at using price to earnings ratios (P/E ratios). To keep it practical, we’ll show how Guaranty Bancshares Inc’s (NASDAQ:GNTY) P/E ratio could help you assess the value on offer. Guaranty Bancshares has a price to earnings ratio of 19.72, based on the last twelve months. That is equivalent to an earnings yield of about 5.1%.

Check out our latest analysis for Guaranty Bancshares

How Do You Calculate A P/E Ratio?

The formula for price to earnings is:

Price to Earnings Ratio = Price per Share ÷ Earnings per Share (EPS)

Or for Guaranty Bancshares:

P/E of 19.72 = $29.34 ÷ $1.49 (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2018.)

Is A High Price-to-Earnings Ratio Good?

A higher P/E ratio means that investors are paying a higher price for each $1 of company earnings. That is not a good or a bad thing per se, but a high P/E does imply buyers are optimistic about the future.

How Growth Rates Impact P/E Ratios

P/E ratios primarily reflect market expectations around earnings growth rates. Earnings growth means that in the future the ‘E’ will be higher. That means even if the current P/E is high, it will reduce over time if the share price stays flat. So while a stock may look expensive based on past earnings, it could be cheap based on future earnings.

Guaranty Bancshares shrunk earnings per share by 5.2% last year. But EPS is up 6.6% over the last 3 years. And over the longer term (5 years) earnings per share have decreased 5.1% annually. So we might expect a relatively low P/E.

How Does Guaranty Bancshares’s P/E Ratio Compare To Its Peers?

The P/E ratio essentially measures market expectations of a company. You can see in the image below that the average P/E (15.5) for companies in the banks industry is lower than Guaranty Bancshares’s P/E.

NasdaqGS:GNTY PE PEG Gauge November 7th 18
NasdaqGS:GNTY PE PEG Gauge November 7th 18

That means that the market expects Guaranty Bancshares will outperform other companies in its industry. Shareholders are clearly optimistic, but the future is always uncertain. So further research is always essential. I often monitor director buying and selling.

Don’t Forget: The P/E Does Not Account For Debt or Bank Deposits

Don’t forget that the P/E ratio considers market capitalization. Thus, the metric does not reflect cash or debt held by the company. Theoretically, a business can improve its earnings (and produce a lower P/E in the future), by taking on debt (or spending its remaining cash).

Such expenditure might be good or bad, in the long term, but the point here is that the balance sheet is not reflected by this ratio.

Guaranty Bancshares’s Balance Sheet

Guaranty Bancshares’s net debt is 28% of its market cap. If you want to compare its P/E ratio to other companies, you should absolutely keep in mind it has significant borrowings.

The Verdict On Guaranty Bancshares’s P/E Ratio

Guaranty Bancshares trades on a P/E ratio of 19.7, which is fairly close to the US market average of 18.5. With modest debt, and a lack of recent growth, it would seem the market is expecting improvement in earnings.

Investors should be looking to buy stocks that the market is wrong about. As value investor Benjamin Graham famously said, ‘In the short run, the market is a voting machine but in the long run, it is a weighing machine.’ So this free visualization of the analyst consensus on future earnings could help you make the right decision about whether to buy, sell, or hold.

Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking at a few good candidates. So take a peek at this free list of companies with modest (or no) debt, trading on a P/E below 20.

To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com.

Advertisement