Advertisement
U.S. markets closed
  • S&P Futures

    5,209.00
    -5.75 (-0.11%)
     
  • Dow Futures

    39,205.00
    -18.00 (-0.05%)
     
  • Nasdaq Futures

    18,188.50
    -43.00 (-0.24%)
     
  • Russell 2000 Futures

    2,048.20
    -1.60 (-0.08%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    82.59
    -0.13 (-0.16%)
     
  • Gold

    2,164.60
    +0.30 (+0.01%)
     
  • Silver

    25.33
    +0.07 (+0.28%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.0878
    +0.0001 (+0.01%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    4.3400
    +0.0360 (+0.84%)
     
  • Vix

    14.33
    -0.08 (-0.56%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.2726
    -0.0002 (-0.02%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    149.2820
    +0.1840 (+0.12%)
     
  • Bitcoin USD

    65,622.76
    -2,292.95 (-3.38%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    885.54
    0.00 (0.00%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    7,722.55
    -4.87 (-0.06%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    39,596.29
    -144.15 (-0.36%)
     

Dunkin' exec: 'We are not Starbucks, we are not political'

Dunkin’ Brands (DNKN), the parent company of Dunkin’ Donuts and Baskin Robbins, does not want to wade into politics. And in making that point, at a law conference in Boston on Monday, one of its executives appeared to take a shot at Starbucks.

“We are not Starbucks (SBUX), we aren’t political,” said Dunkin’ Brands VP of brand stewardship Drayton Martin on a lunch panel at the 2019 meeting of INTA, the International Trademark Association, according to multiple tweets from attendees. (The panel was not recorded, and INTA says it has no transcript.)

Martin said Dunkin has no interest in putting designs on its cups to start cultural conversations.

Starbucks cups with a new design at a Starbucks coffee shop in New York on Monday, Nov. 27, 2017. (AP/Hiro Komae)
Starbucks cups with a new design at a Starbucks coffee shop in New York on Monday, Nov. 27, 2017. (AP/Hiro Komae)

“We don't want to engage you in political conversation, we want to get you in and out of our store in seconds,” she said, according to tweets. Starbucks in the past has occasionally used its cup designs and baristas to attempt to start cultural conversations on issues like race.

Three Dunkin’ Brand executives were on the INTA lunch panel: Martin; director of legal counsel Alana Sharenow; and director of retail business development Chuck Kantner.

Martin added, according to another law professor in attendance, “We don't want people burning their Munchkin boxes.”

That sentiment is a reference to multiple instances, over the last two years, of consumers burning or destroying products—from Keurig machines to Nike socks—to protest the perceived political views of those brands.

In a country that is increasingly divided politically, consumer-facing brands are finding themselves drawn into political debates, even at times when they have tried to avoid commenting on such issues. It has happened to Tic Tac, Tiki Brand torches, Papa John’s pizza, and Under Armour, to name just a few.

Of course, even in saying that it does not wish to be political, and in accusing Starbucks of being political, some see Drayton Martin’s comment as being just as political. Twitter users, in replies to tweets about Martin’s comment, pointed out the irony.

Dunkin’ Brands did not immediately respond to a request for further comment from Yahoo Finance on Monday afternoon.

Disclosure: One of the law professors at the INTA meeting who tweeted about the Dunkin’ executive’s comments is the author’s sister.

Daniel Roberts is a senior writer at Yahoo Finance who closely covers food and coffee. Follow him on Twitter at @readDanwrite.

Read more:

From Tiki to Tic Tac, Trump era has forced consumer brands into politics

Beyond Meat CEO after soaring IPO: ‘I’m not going to look every day at the stock price’

Shaq is the new face of Papa John’s

Kraft Heinz has two glaring issues for investors

German family that owns Krispy Kreme and Panera is reckoning with its Nazi past

How grocers feel about Amazon: ‘There’s a lot more fear now’

Advertisement