U.S. Markets close in 18 mins

Evercore Partners Inc (EVR) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Motley Fool Transcribers, The Motley Fool
Logo of jester cap with thought bubble.

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Evercore Partners Inc  (NYSE: EVR)
Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call
Jan. 30, 2019, 8:00 a.m. ET

Contents:

  • Prepared Remarks
  • Questions and Answers
  • Call Participants

Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Good morning, ladies and gentlemen. Thank you for standing by. Welcome to Evercore Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2018 Financial Results Conference Call.

During today's presentation all parties will be in a listen-only mode. Following the presentation, the conference will be open for questions. (Operator Instructions) This conference call is being recorded today, Wednesday, January 30, 2019.

I would now like to turn the call over to your host Evercore's Head of Investor Relations, Jamie Easton. Please begin ma'am.

Jamie Easton -- Head of Investor Relations

Good morning, and thank you for joining us today for Evercore's fourth quarter and full year 2018 financial results conference call. I'm Jamie Easton Evercore's Head of Investor Relations. Joining me on the call today are Ralph Schlosstein, our President and Chief Executive Officer; John Weinberg, our Executive Chairman; and Bob Walsh, our CFO.

After our prepared remarks, we will open the call for questions. Earlier today, we issued a press release announcing Evercore's fourth quarter and full-year 2018 financial results. The company's discussion of our results today is complementary to that press release, which is available on our website at evercore.com. This conference call is being webcast live on the For Investors section of the website and an archive of it will be available for 30 days beginning approximately one hour after the conclusion of this call.

I want to point out that during the course of this conference call, we may make a number of forward-looking statements. These forward-looking statements are subject to various risks and uncertainties, and there are important factors that could cause actual outcome to differ materially from those indicated in these statements. These factors include, but are not limited to, those discussed in Evercore's filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission, including our annual report on Form 10-K, quarterly reports on Form 10-Q and current reports on Form 8-K.

I want to remind you that the company assumes no duty to update any forward-looking statements. In our presentation today, unless otherwise indicated, we will be discussing adjusted financial measures, which are non-GAAP measures that we believe are meaningful when evaluating the company's performance.

For detailed disclosures on these measures and the GAAP reconciliation, you should refer to the financial data contained within our press release, which as I previously mentioned, is posted on our website. As we continue to believe, it is important to evaluate Evercore's performance on an annual basis. As we've noted previously our results for any particular quarter are influenced by the timing of transaction closings.

I'll now turn the call over to Ralph.

Ralph Schlosstein -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Jamie and good morning everyone. 2018 was a very successful year for Evercore. We served a growing number of clients, providing independent and objective advice regarding, important strategic transactions, raising strategic capital for many important clients and advising on key investments and wealth management decisions.

We added significant talent, enabling us to serve more clients to serve our clients more comprehensively, and to grow our business in the future. And we delivered value to our shareholders, reporting our tenth consecutive year of growth in revenues, operating income, net income and earnings per share.

With revenues surpassing $2 billion for the first time in our history and operating income approaching $600 million. We project that we have once again increased our market share in advisory fees, among all public firms that report their advisory revenue separately. Based on the reported advisory revenues and consensus estimates for our competitors, it is probable that we will be the largest independent advisory firm in terms of revenues for 2018 and the fourth-largest globally.

Underwriting revenues exceeded $70 million for the year, delivering strong growth in this important capability. And we experienced market share growth in equities, as commissions and checks were up 4% in the second half of 2018, when compared with our second half of 2017. Wealth management continue to contribute, delivering study revenue growth. Assets under management and our investment management business increased to $9.1 billion at the end of the year. Our strong results enabled us to return more than $376 million of capital, through increased dividends and share repurchases.

We remain committed to our long-term capital return strategy, offsetting any dilution -- potential dilution from annual bonus awards and investments in new hires each year, while returning a meaningful portion of our earnings as dividends. These achievements meaningfully advanced our goal of becoming the most respected independent, investment banking advisory firm globally.

Let me now turn to our financial results. For the year, we achieved record adjusted net revenues, adjusted operating income and adjusted net income of $2.1 billion, $591 million and $454 million up 26%, 39% and 64% respectively. 2018 adjusted earnings per share was $9.01, an increase of 65% over the same period last year.

Adjusted operating margins were 28.4% for the full-year, with a full year compensation ratio of 56.7%. Record revenues and discipline in managing both compensation and non-compensation costs, delivered meaningful operating leverage. For the quarter, adjusted net revenues were $776 million, a quarterly record, up 63% versus the same period last year, which up until this quarter was our record.

Adjusted net income in the quarter was $194 million, with adjusted earnings per share of $3.93, in each case the best quarter in our firm's history. These results were up 149% and 154% respectively, from the prior year. The adjusted operating margin was 34% for the quarter compared to 28% -- 28.1%, from a year ago. The fourth quarter compensation ratio was 55% versus 56%, the same period last year.

Our strong results reflect contributions from all parts of our firm. In investment banking, the advisory revenues for 2018 were $1.74 billion up 32% year-over-year and fourth quarter revenues of $696 million, were up 81% year-over-year. Advisory results were a record both on an annual and a quarterly basis.

Underwriting revenues exceeded $70 million for the year, up 56% and a -- once again a record for our firm. Commissions and related fees were $200 million for the year, down 3% versus 2017 and quarterly commission revenues were $61 million, up 7% versus the fourth quarter of 2017.

And I would call your attention to the trend in the first quarter, we were down roughly 13% second quarter -- we were down about 5%; the third quarter we were flat; and then the fourth quarter, as I just indicated, we were up 7%. In investment management, asset management and administration fees were up 9% for the year, when revenues related to the divested Institutional Trust and Independent Fiduciary business are excluded.

We revised our presentation of adjusted advisory, underwriting and commission revenues and non-compensation expenses to enhance the comparability of our results, with all of our peers. All of the above measures, reflect these revisions, which tend to reduce our adjusted compensation ratio and to reduce our adjusted operating margins. Bob will discuss this further in his remarks.

Let me now turn the call over to John to comment further on our business and the current market environment.

John S. Weinberg -- Chairman of the Board and Executive Chairman

Thank you, Ralph. The business environment for investment banking service has been broadly favorable. Strategic activity increased as announced transactions greater than $1 billion grew. Activism remained elevated and private equity activity has increased. Demand for independent advice for both capital raising and balance sheet management is growing, as equity and debt issuance were strong for most of the year and restructuring of debt, including in-court bankruptcy cases grew. Equities environment, continues to evolve as clients rationalize their payments for research and executional services.

Let me now briefly comment on our highlights. We advised on, 663 client transactions, during 2018, a record number compared to 574 in 2017. We advised on three of the five largest transactions, announced during the year, including Takeda/Shire, the largest deal of the year. We advised on the two largest technology, media and telecommunications deals announced during the year and ranked as the top independent bank in the TMT sector globally.

Notably, TMT was the largest sector for 2018. Our industrials and consumer verticals gained traction, as we advised on significant transactions in each of these sectors. We served as bookrunner for 35 of 50 underwriting transactions, including as lead underwriter on our first IPO. Our work on the CFE privatization in Mexico, both as an advisor and an underwriter, was highlighted when the transaction was recognized as a 2018 deal of the year by Banker Magazine.

We are continuing to expand the bread of capabilities we offer to the financial sponsor community. In the fourth quarter, we welcomed our eighth and final advisory SMD hire for 2018. Anthony Laubi, to our industrials team. For the year, we added 14 SMDs, eight recruited from other firms and six promoted internally, building our presence in consumer, adding to our strength in industrials, restructuring and private capital advisory and overall elevating our global reach. These investments unquestionably, will contribute to our future growth. Ralph will expand on our start for 2019 talent additions and the large opportunity to continue to add talent in his closing remarks.

As Ralph noted, advisory revenues for the year were $1.74 billion. The composition of advisory revenues for 2018, remained diverse and reflect contributions from multiple sectors and capabilities, including energy, financial services, TMT, activism and capital advisory. We had 345 fee, events greater than $1 million, as compared to 255 in 2017.

2018 exemplifies the breadth and depth of our differentiated capabilities, which continue to enhance our ability to advise our clients more deeply. Our investments in capital advisory are central to this effort, with revenues growing rapidly again this year.

Further highlighting our diversification of capabilities, we finished the year with 18 Senior Managing Directors or approximately 20% of our footprint, focused on advisory capabilities, outside of strategic M&A. These SMDs create, healthy levels of productivity, individually and together contribute to the overall productivity of the firm.

Despite default rates, our restructuring business remains very productive. The business spans a broad range of industries, where a balanced mix of company and credit assignments and ranges from refinancing to liability management and from Chapter 11 advise to debt capital advisory globally. We are seeing firsthand, a constructive environment for M&A and we continue to have active dialogues with our clients.

Let me now turn to Bob to discuss our GAAP results and other financial matters.

Robert Walsh -- Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer

Thank you, John. Let me begin by briefly discussing the change in our presentation of our adjusted revenues. As Ralph noted earlier, in the fourth quarter, we advised our adjusted presentation to eliminate the netting of revenue and non-compensation expenses related to client-related expenses, expenses associated with revenue sharing engagements with third parties and provisions for uncollected receivables. This adjustment brings our results more in-line with our US GAAP presentation and the presentation of our competitors but has no impact on operating income, net income or earnings per share. A supplement reflecting the updated presentation for our quarterly historical results for 2016 through 2018, has been posted to the four investors section of our website.

Moving to our GAAP results. Net revenues, net income and earnings per share on a GAAP basis of $2.1 billion, $377 million and $8.33 respectively, were a record for the year, just as they were a record on an adjusted basis. For the fourth quarter; net revenues, net income and earnings per share on a GAAP basis were $771 million, $163 million and $3.67, respectively are also records.

As noted in the earnings release, we adopted the new revenue recognition guidance under GAAP on January 1st, of this year -- last year. Following adoption, we now review open transactions, at period end, which we anticipate are near closing to determine whether as of period end, all material conditions for closing have been met, and it would have been probable that a significant reversal of any revenue recognized for those transactions would not occur in a future period.

During the fourth quarter, we recognized $3.4 million of advisory fees, as variable consideration that would have been included in the first quarter of 2019, under prior revenue recognition guidance. Consistent with prior periods, our adjusted results for the fourth quarter, exclude certain items that primarily relate to our acquisitions and dispositions and also include the full share-count, associated with those acquisitions.

Specifically, we adjusted for costs associated with divesting of Class J LP Units, granted in conjunction with the ISI acquisition. For the quarter, we expensed $3.8 million, related to these Class J LP Units. Our adjusted results for the quarter, also exclude special charges of $1.1 million, primarily related to accelerated depreciation for leasehold improvements in our New York headquarters and $1.5 million of expense related to an increase in amounts to foreign earn-out.

Turning to non-compensation costs. Our firmwide non-compensation cost per employee were approximately $50,000 for the fourth quarter and $179,000 for the full-year. With regard to taxes, our GAAP tax rate for the quarter was 23.9% up versus 22.8% in the prior quarter but lower than the 100.7% in the same period last year.

The rate for the fourth quarter of 2018, as well as the rate for the prior year fourth quarter, was impacted by the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act in December of 2017, which resulted in a decrease in income tax rates in the US in 2018 and in future years. This resulted in a decrease of 12 percentage points in our US GAAP and 13 percentage points in our adjusted effective tax rates for the quarter.

The fourth quarter of 2017, did reflect a charge of $143 million, relating -- resulting from the remeasurement of deferred tax assets, corresponding to the newly enacted tax rates. Likewise other revenues on a GAAP basis for 2017, included a gain of approximately $77 million, related to the reduction of our liability under the tax receivable agreement paused by the lower tax rates.

Our share count for adjusted earnings per share was 49.4 million shares for the quarter, down in comparison to the prior quarter, driven by both share repurchases and a lower average share price. On a GAAP basis, the share count was 44.5 million shares for the quarter. As Rob noted, we returned $376 million to shareholders through dividends and share repurchases, including our quarterly dividend of $0.50 per share and repurchases of 3.1 million shares or units, at an average price of $93.24.

Finally, with regard to our financial position, our cash position remains strong as it customarily does at this time of the year to account for future cash bonuses. And we also have a cash -- we also have funds earmarked for facilities expansion and improvements, regulatory compliance and overall operating requirements. We hold $1.1 billion of cash in marketable securities, at the end of the year, with current assets exceeding current liabilities by approximately $740 million.

I'll now turn the call back to Ralph for closing remarks.

Ralph Schlosstein -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thanks, Bob. We begin 2019 very well-positioned, especially with respect to our business and talent pipelines. First, with regard to our advisory business. We started the year with several notable announcements, advising on the two largest deals in the US and the largest UK transaction in 2019. These announcements showcase the diversity of our coverage of sectors, capabilities and geographies.

Our backlog continues to be strong, notwithstanding the strong quarter that we have just reported. With respect to talent, we recently promoted seven of our Advisory Managing Directors to Senior Managing Director. We now have 33 internally promoted SMDs and 11-fold increase since 2010, when we had just three. Talent developed at the firm, now represents over 30% of our advisory group SMD population.

In terms of external SMD hires, 2019 is also up to a solid start. We recently announced that Zaheed Kajani, joined us from Citigroup, as an SMD, focusing on internet and digital media. And we announced yesterday that John Startin will join us in April from Goldman Sachs, leading our metals, materials and mining practice globally. Between these promotions and new hires, we have reached a new milestone.

We now have 107 advisory Senior Managing Directors. While this is an impressive number, we still have significant opportunities to add talent in almost every sector to enhance our advisory, capabilities globally. In addition, we continue to invest in Evercore ISI and already in 2019, announced an addition to our leadership team, Marc Harris, as Director of Research. We also strengthen our senior research team with Ravi Mehrotra in Healthcare.

Moreover, we have a couple of other senior research analysts, who we expect will commit shortly to join our platform. With the strong foundation, we built and a very strong and much appreciated support of our clients, we had a very successful 2018. We start 2019 in the best position ever to serve our clients globally and to create value for our shareholders. And while I must say, we began to build our revenues, every January 1st, we are confident that we have set a path for continued excellence and success in the coming years. Thanks very much, we'll now open it up for questions.

Questions and Answers:

Operator

Thank you sir. We'll now begin the question-and-answer session. (Operator Instructions) Our first question comes from Brennan Hawken with UBS.

Brennan Hawken -- UBS -- Analyst

Hi good morning guys. Thanks for taking the question.

Ralph Schlosstein -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Good morning.

Brennan Hawken -- UBS -- Analyst

So clearly we saw from the results here, why you guys were not too worried about the timing here that held back last quarter. So pretty solid to see that come through. And Ralph, I know, you commented that despite this strength, the backlog remained strong.

So just curious about, how you guys are feeling in-light of that given that we've seen, announced M&A volumes slow in the last couple of quarters. How do you feel about this high bar that you've set for the full-year 2018 and growing-off of that base, given some of the cross currents that we're seeing?

Ralph Schlosstein -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, actually -- Brennan I thought of retiring after this year. Look we've had some volatility in the markets over the last three months or so. I think, we've said -- I said publicly at couple of investor conferences that -- had that volatility or if that volatility continued that at some point, we would expect it to affect our backlogs.

To-date, we see no evidence of that. And what I can tell you is whether that is a function of the continued activity and dialogue broadly in the M&A markets or whether it is more unique to Evercore or to all of the independent firms or most of the independent firms. But to-date, we really don't see any impact and our -- as John said our backlogs remain strong.

Robert Walsh -- Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer

Yeah. I just -- I would just add to that and just say, as we look at what we're dealing with right now in terms of client dialogues and in terms of activities for our bankers. We really haven't seen a fall-off. Having said that, we are, like you watching this year unfold and we recognize that there are risk factors and there are things that could enter into it -- that could impact CEO confidence levels and also financeability. And so, whereas right now, we feel very good about where we are. We are watching like you are as this year unfolds.

Brennan Hawken -- UBS -- Analyst

Yeah. That's all really fair. So no signs of it yet, but carefully watching. That's great. And then could you -- I think, Ralph you've highlighted a few hires that you all expect might be joining here soon. What is the competition for talent right now, out on the Street? How do you feel about beyond the little preview -- that you gave us on the fact that you think, there might be some folks in -- who soon would be announced as 2019 progresses. How do you feel about the hiring here in the coming year? I know, it's always a case-by-case basis. But are you feeling good about adding folks?

Ralph Schlosstein -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Well, I think, we always say at the beginning of the year that we expect to add four to seven or five to eight new hires from outside. And I think, we would say exactly the same thing at the beginning of this year. In the last couple of years, we've tended to be at the upper-end of that range. And it's I think, a little too early to say. But I certainly think there is a reasonably good shot that -- that would be the case, again this year.

And in terms of the competition for talent, it's always scarce. We do believe, we have a pretty unique proposition within the independent advisory firms both in terms of our culture and the breadth of capabilities that we have. And I know, when I sit down with senior people who are considering, moving -- I generally say to them, it's my view that they can do more business with their client base at Evercore than they can at any other independent firm because of the breadth of our capabilities. And I really don't get any pushback on that. So I like our competitive position.

John S. Weinberg -- Chairman of the Board and Executive Chairman

With respect to our recruiting, we have, had a rule, which is that we are not going to overreach for growth. And what we mean by that is when we have opportunities to hire really good people, we hire really good people but we're not going to hire people that we took think are really good just because we need to kind of fill out an area. Right now, what we're seeing in terms of people who are willing to talk to us and wanting to hear what we have to say is that there is a very healthy number of people, who want to have dialogues with us.

And we're going to try and grow responsibly, but we're not going to overstretch to get people to come in. And we're going to keep that philosophy. And so, hopefully that has actually worked well for us over the last few years. And we're hoping it continues to do so. But the dialogues are quite healthy, with respect to people out there.

Brennan Hawken -- UBS -- Analyst

Perfect. Thanks for all the color.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Jeff Harte of Sandler O'Neill.

Jeffery Harte -- Sandler O'Neill -- Analyst

Hi. Good morning, guys.

Ralph Schlosstein -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Good morning, Jeffery.

Jeffery Harte -- Sandler O'Neill -- Analyst

Really nice quarter. You talked about the backlog a little bit. Can you qualify it -- at all versus kind of prior periods? I know, you won't quantify it, but it's just that revenue strength from closing was so strong in the fourth quarter. The pipeline we can visibly see, kind of seems to have declined quite a bit.

Ralph Schlosstein -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yeah. The visible pipeline, as I think, you all recognize at this point is a rather weak predictor of how we're doing. And I'll repeat exactly what I said in the opening remarks that notwithstanding the strong quarter, our pipeline remains strong.

Jeffery Harte -- Sandler O'Neill -- Analyst

Okay. And a little about Europe. With Brexit coming off, we don't know if it will be a hard landing or soft landing. Given that you guys historically have had a really strong presence in the UK. What are you expecting? What is kind of your expected impact from different Brexit scenarios on M&A activity levels over there?

Ralph Schlosstein -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Well I think, it's almost as uncertain as what actually happens in Brexit itself. But what we're basically prepared for every eventuality. We have -- we certainly will be in a position that we aren't already, to operate in whatever configuration or reconfiguration occurs between the UK and Europe. And I would say as a general matter the -- we don't really -- we have not yet seen any real impact on European M&A activity from a negative perspective due to the uncertainty associated with Brexit. And obviously, for us, if you look at us compared to our two principal global, independent advisory firm competitors, we have a quite a bit smaller footprint in Europe than they do, which represents a material opportunity for us.

John S. Weinberg -- Chairman of the Board and Executive Chairman

In real sense though, in terms of what we do for clients, the dialogues continue to be very strong. We've really have found that there is a lot of activity in terms of thinking about strategic things. And we think, that we will be able to execute across borders and for our clients every bit of the way we did before. And so, we anticipate that obviously, Brexit could go any number of different ways. But we think in any way, that it does go, we're going to be able to advise our clients and help them with the strategic transactions they want to do, really in any scenario.

Jeffery Harte -- Sandler O'Neill -- Analyst

Okay. And finally, a competitor indicated that kind of the market volatility and macro uncertainty, deteriorated somewhat of a Goldilocks situation where it wasn't weighing on kind of traditional M&A activities, but was actually leading to a pick-up in restructuring kind of new business. Are you seeing that kind of new business in both being strong situation as well?

Ralph Schlosstein -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Our backlog reflects, strength in both of those areas. And obviously, with default rates last year at roughly 1% that does being -- prevent a hugely robust restructuring environment that tends to accompany a real downturn in the real economy, which is not something that we're seeing at this point and quite honestly not something that we're anticipating for 2019 either. But as I said before our backlogs remain strong and that is a reflection of the broad capabilities that we have as a firm, including restructuring.

John S. Weinberg -- Chairman of the Board and Executive Chairman

As you know we've added resources to restructuring. And as you also saw this year, restructuring had a very good year despite the fact that bankruptcies weren't up dramatically. And so, we feel like that business is very healthy. So it's going to do well really in any economic scenario, as far as we can see. And so, if any side of the restructuring business starts to pick-up I think, we're well-positioned at this point. We clearly have a broad degree of capabilities. And we're seeing those new hires really actually complement our business tremendously.

Jeffery Harte -- Sandler O'Neill -- Analyst

Okay. Thank you.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Mike Needham of Bank of America Merrill Lynch.

Michael Needham -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Hi, good morning, everyone. So the first question, I've got is on the cash balance. You ended the year with $1.1 billion that's up from $700 million a year ago. And I think, that current assets minus liabilities, has grown close to the same rate. You know, just wondering are there near-term cash needs that you're holding more cash for -- if not what would you view as excess?

Robert Walsh -- Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer

Well, obviously there are near-term cash needs, bonuses comes sort of top of mind for me. And as I noted, there are other cash needs that we are planning for. We've talked about it on a couple of calls now. Most notably, facilities expansion. So we very deliberately build cash for operating purposes. But we also want to have some flexibility, Mike to execute the capital, return strategy that Ralph mentioned we're in a position where we can do buybacks. And normally, the first quarter because of net settlement is a fairly large buyback period.

Michael Needham -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Okay. All right. Got it. And then for hiring, if you guys don't mind expanding a little bit, spending time discussing headcount growth below the Senior Managing Director level. I think, the firm's perception of labor market has grown to be pretty strong. Hoping you can touch on what you're seeing at the more junior levels, as you inevitably generate more senior talent from within over time?

Ralph Schlosstein -- President and Chief Executive Officer

I would say that -- that is a major focus of the firm. And I think, you've heard me, say in the past that 9.5 years ago, when I joined, I said that we're going to go on a 10 year to 15 year journey, from a firm that grows and sustains itself primarily by filching other people's talent to one that grows and sustains itself by hiring, training, development, mentoring and promoting its own. And the statistics that I've gave you at the outset, the elevenfold in the number of internally promoted SMDs is evidence of that.

You can't achieve that without having extraordinarily high-quality input, younger people at the beginning because the senior managing directors of 2030 (ph) are being hired today. It's something that we focus extraordinarily highly on. If you look at our -- these websites that -- where young people rank the places that they work versus the places that others work or their friends work. We do extraordinarily well. And that -- those experiences are widely known by the talent pool that's leaving either undergraduate school or business school. So and that's reflected in the extraordinarily high-acceptance rate we have of offers that we make either for associates to our leading business school or analysts who are leaving undergraduate school.

John S. Weinberg -- Chairman of the Board and Executive Chairman

Talent development for us, is a strategic imperative. And both Ralph and I spent a lot of time, not just with the senior level lateral hiring, but also at the lower level. And we also spend a lot of time on a lot of our human capital programs, realizing what Ralph said, that developing our talent is one of the most important things, we can do to self-sustain. And so I think, it's fair to say that if you look at the things that we worry about and think about all the time, it's people development, both hiring and retaining talented people. And we look at it on all levels.

Michael Needham -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Okay. Thank you. One more on other revenue. It's a modeling question. What drove the loss? Was that -- like a trading loss? Thanks.

Robert Walsh -- Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer

We don't trade. But I can do that. We still have some legacy investments from our private equity business of years gone by. So marks associated with those investments do go through other revenue. And there is a little bit of FX in there.

Michael Needham -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Thanks.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Devin Ryan of JMP Securities. Your line is open.

Devin Ryan -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Great. Good morning, Ralph, John and Bob. How are you?

Ralph Schlosstein -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Fine.

Devin Ryan -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Great quarter. So kind of where to begin here. I guess, first question, just love to talk a bit about the M&A cycle. My sense is you're not seeing kind of the normal signpost of a prior peak cycle. So just love to get a little bit of perspective on where you think, as a firm you're overachieving and underachieving? And then, connected to that, you're putting some huge average senior managing SMD productivity numbers. And so, just trying to get a sense of what you attribute that to be kind of one plus one, is more than two just as you added more advisory capabilities over the years? And really, the reason I'm asking is because I just think, that the numbers are so big that people are a little reluctant to kind of model further expansion from here?

John S. Weinberg -- Chairman of the Board and Executive Chairman

Well in terms of the merger cycle, it's always hard to predict the cycle. All we can do is say, what we're seeing right now and what's in front of us and how our business looks. And frankly, we are seeing healthy activity in most of our sectors. We're very busy with dialogues with boards and CEOs, on any number of types of transactions and all different sizes. And so, I think, it's just -- it's safe to say that it's hard to characterize this cycle of the M&A world other than to say that it's very healthy for us right now.

We're seeing strong activity. And we're going to see it going forward. I'll let Ralph talk a little bit about that the numbers themselves on -- in what you're referring to.

Ralph Schlosstein -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Look the -- I've sat here and tried to explain in a quantitative way, why we've experienced the growth that we have. And, I think, there are a number of things that have some linkage or some ability to measure quantitatively. And I think, those revolve around; number one, the breadth of capabilities that we have, which run the gamut from equity underwriting to equity advisory to debt advisory to tax capabilities to the premier activists defense practice. And what those -- the breadth of those capabilities really does two things.

Number one, it provides incremental revenue opportunities. So on some of the larger mergers that we're involved with, we actually get compensated with additional revenue for assisting with negotiating of the debt provided by, in many cases our co-advisor. So there are opportunities for incremental revenue. But they also, I think, very importantly, allow us to be the sole advisor or the lead advisor, for a longer period of time which actually affects the share of the fees that we might earn, when we have a co-advisor or prevent a co-advisor in circumstances where the first advisor in. So that's clearly one thing, that's going on.

Second thing is that -- we are pretty, regularly evaluating our senior managing director population. And so, at this point, we have a team that you'd really like to go into battle with. And there's always -- in the past years there's always been a couple of -- three or four, who for whatever reason, weren't successful with our business model and they've chosen to typically go back to a larger firm. So the average quality of our SMDs is as high as it's as ever been.

And then the third thing which is hard to measure and certainly hard to measure its effect on our business is --you know, our brand definitely is improving a little bit, maybe more than a little bit. And the consequence of that is that I think, we get a few more at bats during the course of the year and our batting average is maybe a little bit higher. So with the same team on the field, maybe we're just doing a little bit more business. We're choosing not to report the precise measurement of SMD productivity for the reason that it is quite high.

Devin Ryan -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Got it. Okay. Very helpful. And just a follow-up to some of that commentary. I mean, one thing that doesn't seem to be getting, maybe enough play in the conversation, at least in opinion is, it does seem like every dollar of deal value today for the firm has the potential to be more productive just with all those capabilities that you've added. And then, I don't think that gets reflected very well in the data sources that everybody looks at.

And so you mentioned you can kind of be the M&A advisor longer. You can advise on hedging solutions. You can advise on the equity raise, debt financing. So I don't know if it's possible, but it will be great to get any more detail on kind of how average fees have been trending or any information that you would point to that fees are higher per deal size? I mean, it seems like it's obvious from the outside. But I don't know, if there's any quantification you can give us.

Ralph Schlosstein -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Not really. I mean, we give you information on fee events and advisory revenues.

Robert Walsh -- Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer

Devin, if you simply look at this quarter's results and fees over $1 million, the arithmetic will tell you, it's number of fee events is by far and away the big driver not average fee -- that have grown over time. But what's really driven the current quarter is serving more clients well.

Devin Ryan -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Okay, great. I leave it there. Congrats on a great quarter.

Ralph Schlosstein -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you.

Robert Walsh -- Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer

Thank you.

Operator

The next question comes from Steven Chubak of Wolfe Research. Your line is open.

Steven Chubak -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst

Hi, good morning,

Ralph Schlosstein -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Good morning.

Steven Chubak -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst

So I wanted to start off with a question on revenue and earnings resiliency. I know, you touched on this a bit in your prepared remarks. But I was hoping to dig a bit deeper. Just the results this quarter were quite impressive. The late-technical (ph) concern are certainly and the $64,000 question is really how, we should think about the downside risk to revenue and earnings in a garden variety of recession?

And if, something that's come up quite often in our discussions with investors. I was hoping you can maybe shed some light on how you think about revenue and earnings drawdown risk for Evercore, in the event of a more severe economic slowdown. And maybe, more specifically, what are some of the offsets, whether it's revenue levers you can pull or being able to flex a little bit of comp ratio to ensure that you can deliver that earnings resiliency?

Ralph Schlosstein -- President and Chief Executive Officer

We are precisely as good at predicting future economic events, as we are predicting the effect on our revenues. The only thing, I can tell you is that we are -- as you know, in a cyclical business, and as the leaders of the firm, some of whow are on this call, and others aren't. We do a lot of thinking about how we will respond to a downturn, in M&A which typically accompanies a recessionary period. And we've done a lot of work inside the firm and socializing that broadly within the firm. We have no idea when that's going to happen. And we see no evidence of that today.

And obviously, depending upon the severity of the recession, that will have an impact on the severity of our revenue decline. I would say, a couple of things. One, as all of you have seen in the last few years, we've been significant market share gainers. I would look back at the period of time, from 2010 to 2013, when M&A activity was kind of flat as a pancake. I think, it was roughly $2.2 trillion give or take $100 (ph) billion or $200 billion for four years in a row.

And we grew quite successfully during that period not because the rising tide was lifting our ship but because we were actually taking share from our competitors. Obviously, we're quite a bit bigger today than we were back then. But one of the things, that I think, it would be useful for all of you to take note of is there seems to be a view that the larger independent firms, chronologically are going to grow more slowly or take share less successfully than our brethren, who are roughly half our size. I think, if you look back over the last few years that has not been the case.

So honestly, it's a little bit like -- I always -- the last year, we've been asked what's going to happen as a result of MiFID II and to our business of -- to the research business? And I think, we said, very consistently that MiFID II is going to shrink the pool of revenue available for research. But, we believe it's going to increase the market share for very high quality research which we have.

And I think if you look at the trend over the last four quarters, over the four quarters last year, which I talked about in my opening remarks, clearly both of those things are happening. And the net effect of that on us has been relatively limited and declining during the course of the year. I actually, think the same phenomenon, will be true -- at the next advisory downturn that clearly, the aggregate pool of revenue will shrink and it'll shrink roughly in proportion to the severity of the economic decline. But I think, there is a reasonably good chance that our market share during that period will continue to grow.

John S. Weinberg -- Chairman of the Board and Executive Chairman

Yeah, I would say that, you should assume that -- that we're looking at all the different things that we can do if there is a downturn because these downturns, as you know, and Ralph said are inevitable. But also I want to emphasize that from our perspective, our priorities are always going to be keep the business healthy and to make money for shareholders. But at the same time, we think, it's important that if we go into recession (ph), we want to come out of the downturn with more market share than what we would end with.

So we'll be working hard to be smart, about how we allocate resources and invest in our business even in a situation where volumes slowdown because our overall long-term strategy is to continue to pick-up market share.

Steven Chubak -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst

Thanks to all the helpful color and Ralph, I like the MiFID II analogy as well, so thank you for those insights. Just one follow-up for me, relating to financial sponsor deal activity. You know, how do you think your position competitively to take advantage of some of the expectations for increased deployment of some of that private equity dry powder?

John S. Weinberg -- Chairman of the Board and Executive Chairman

We have extremely strong relationships with private equity firms. And many of our industry groups have very special relationships. We think, we're actually very well-positioned to be involved in activities. And we think, that a lot of the strategic M&A advice that we give, as well as our market knowledge across the portfolios, is something that is really helping us a lot with a lot of those dialogues. We actually feel quite good about our involvement with the private equity complexes right now.

Steven Chubak -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst

Thank you very much.

Operator

Thank you. Our next question comes from Jim Mitchell of Buckingham Research. Your line is open.

James Mitchell -- Buckingham Research Group -- Analyst

Hi, good morning. Bob maybe if I can push a little bit on cash and capital return. You guys over the last three years, have -- the cash has grown about over -- more than doubled over the last three years. I appreciate the incremental cash needs in terms of bonuses, higher earnings, higher bonuses and the build-out -- of your new offices. But it seems, more incremental than really needing double the cash, you needed three years ago. You've been growing net cash every year. At what point do you feel like, hey, we have enough cash and every incremental net cash we produce can be returned to shareholders, whether it's special dividend buybacks, et cetera.

Just trying to get a sense of where that endpoint is because you certainly, had a pretty good opportunity in the fourth quarter to deploy cash at a pretty low multiple on your stock. And you guys, didn't really do too much.

Robert Walsh -- Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer

If that endpoint is unpredictable because of all the growth plans, that Ralph and John have been speaking about. We certainly want to be nimble to return the buyback shares bluntly. And we can debate whether we bought enough in the fourth quarter or not but we certainly had a big uptick. We're growing to business. We are entering new markets, some of which are regulated. So we want to have the flexibility to support all of that.

Ralph Schlosstein -- President and Chief Executive Officer

But I mean, from a policy point of view, we have -- look we have some unique, what I would call relatively onetime, needs although as you grow you're always doing something with space. But we have a quantum leap up here in New York. And last time, I checked contractors and landlords like to be paid in cash. And then, as we've done in the past, we have businesses where we don't own a 100% of the business and we buy a portion of that business. We typically do that in the first quarter.

So that is another use of cash. And then the third is obviously as the business grows -- and in regulated environments, we do need a little bit more capital from a regulatory point of view. But those things together may create the appearance that our historical policy of pretty much returning all of our earnings to our shareholders in one form or another is being altered, it's not. It's really that there are some meaningful needs for cash in the business in the past year and the coming year. And obviously, we're going to do that because we're growing.

James Mitchell -- Buckingham Research Group -- Analyst

Okay. Fair enough. And maybe just a question on the comp ratio. It came down for the second year in a row to 56.7%. Is that a good jumping-off point for next year? Obviously, you've had a very strong revenue. So I don't want to get ahead of myself if you feel like that was just sort of an outsized good year or do you think that's sustainable?

Ralph Schlosstein -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Look I think, our visibility forward -- as I've often said is pretty clear to the quarter that we're in. Somewhat foggy to the next quarter and then it gets quite foggy. And notwithstanding what I said about our backlogs. So we tend to be careful in our initial accruals. And I suspect when we get to the end of the first quarter, we'll probably do the same thing again.

James Mitchell -- Buckingham Research Group -- Analyst

Got it. Thanks.

Operator

Thank you. There appear to be no questions at this time. I would now like to turn the floor to Ralph Schlosstein for any closing comments.

Ralph Schlosstein -- President and Chief Executive Officer

No. Thank you very much for your time and we hope that we can be sitting here a year from now with an equally exciting result. But no promises. Take care guys.

Operator

This concludes today's Evercore fourth quarter and full year 2018 financial results conference call. You may now disconnect. Everyone have a great day.

Duration: 58 minutes

Call participants:

Jamie Easton -- Head of Investor Relations

Ralph Schlosstein -- President and Chief Executive Officer

John S. Weinberg -- Chairman of the Board and Executive Chairman

Robert Walsh -- Senior Managing Director and Chief Financial Officer

Brennan Hawken -- UBS -- Analyst

Jeffery Harte -- Sandler O'Neill -- Analyst

Michael Needham -- Bank of America Merrill Lynch -- Analyst

Devin Ryan -- JMP Securities -- Analyst

Steven Chubak -- Wolfe Research -- Analyst

James Mitchell -- Buckingham Research Group -- Analyst

More EVR analysis

Transcript powered by AlphaStreet

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

More From The Motley Fool

Motley Fool Transcribers has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.