Is Hi-P International Limited’s (SGX:H17) ROE Of 22.32% Sustainable?

With an ROE of 22.32%, Hi-P International Limited (SGX:H17) outpaced its own industry which delivered a less exciting 11.42% over the past year. While the impressive ratio tells us that H17 has made significant profits from little equity capital, ROE doesn’t tell us if H17 has borrowed debt to make this happen. We’ll take a closer look today at factors like financial leverage to determine whether H17’s ROE is actually sustainable. See our latest analysis for Hi-P International

Breaking down ROE — the mother of all ratios

Return on Equity (ROE) is a measure of Hi-P International’s profit relative to its shareholders’ equity. For example, if the company invests SGD1 in the form of equity, it will generate SGD0.22 in earnings from this. In most cases, a higher ROE is preferred; however, there are many other factors we must consider prior to making any investment decisions.

Return on Equity = Net Profit ÷ Shareholders Equity

ROE is assessed against cost of equity, which is measured using the Capital Asset Pricing Model (CAPM) – but let’s not dive into the details of that today. For now, let’s just look at the cost of equity number for Hi-P International, which is 8.38%. Given a positive discrepancy of 13.95% between return and cost, this indicates that Hi-P International pays less for its capital than what it generates in return, which is a sign of capital efficiency. ROE can be dissected into three distinct ratios: net profit margin, asset turnover, and financial leverage. This is called the Dupont Formula:

Dupont Formula

ROE = profit margin × asset turnover × financial leverage

ROE = (annual net profit ÷ sales) × (sales ÷ assets) × (assets ÷ shareholders’ equity)

ROE = annual net profit ÷ shareholders’ equity

SGX:H17 Last Perf May 12th 18
SGX:H17 Last Perf May 12th 18

The first component is profit margin, which measures how much of sales is retained after the company pays for all its expenses. Asset turnover shows how much revenue Hi-P International can generate with its current asset base. The most interesting ratio, and reflective of sustainability of its ROE, is financial leverage. Since financial leverage can artificially inflate ROE, we need to look at how much debt Hi-P International currently has. The debt-to-equity ratio currently stands at a low 42.90%, meaning the above-average ROE is due to its capacity to produce profit growth without a huge debt burden.

SGX:H17 Historical Debt May 12th 18
SGX:H17 Historical Debt May 12th 18

Next Steps:

ROE is one of many ratios which meaningfully dissects financial statements, which illustrates the quality of a company. Hi-P International’s above-industry ROE is encouraging, and is also in excess of its cost of equity. ROE is not likely to be inflated by excessive debt funding, giving shareholders more conviction in the sustainability of high returns. ROE is a helpful signal, but it is definitely not sufficient on its own to make an investment decision.

For Hi-P International, I’ve put together three relevant factors you should look at:

  1. Financial Health: Does it have a healthy balance sheet? Take a look at our free balance sheet analysis with six simple checks on key factors like leverage and risk.

  2. Valuation: What is Hi-P International worth today? Is the stock undervalued, even when its growth outlook is factored into its intrinsic value? The intrinsic value infographic in our free research report helps visualize whether Hi-P International is currently mispriced by the market.

  3. Other High-Growth Alternatives : Are there other high-growth stocks you could be holding instead of Hi-P International? Explore our interactive list of stocks with large growth potential to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing!


To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned.

Advertisement