Is Maple Leaf Foods Inc.’s (TSE:MFI) 9.0% Return On Capital Employed Good News?

In this article:

Today we are going to look at Maple Leaf Foods Inc. (TSE:MFI) to see whether it might be an attractive investment prospect. Specifically, we’ll consider its Return On Capital Employed (ROCE), since that will give us an insight into how efficiently the business can generate profits from the capital it requires.

First of all, we’ll work out how to calculate ROCE. Then we’ll compare its ROCE to similar companies. Finally, we’ll look at how its current liabilities affect its ROCE.

Return On Capital Employed (ROCE): What is it?

ROCE measures the ‘return’ (pre-tax profit) a company generates from capital employed in its business. In general, businesses with a higher ROCE are usually better quality. In brief, it is a useful tool, but it is not without drawbacks. Author Edwin Whiting says to be careful when comparing the ROCE of different businesses, since ‘No two businesses are exactly alike.’

So, How Do We Calculate ROCE?

The formula for calculating the return on capital employed is:

Return on Capital Employed = Earnings Before Interest and Tax (EBIT) ÷ (Total Assets – Current Liabilities)

Or for Maple Leaf Foods:

0.09 = CA$236m ÷ (CA$2.8b – CA$369m) (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2018.)

Therefore, Maple Leaf Foods has an ROCE of 9.0%.

Check out our latest analysis for Maple Leaf Foods

Is Maple Leaf Foods’s ROCE Good?

One way to assess ROCE is to compare similar companies. It appears that Maple Leaf Foods’s ROCE is fairly close to the Food industry average of 9.0%. Setting aside the industry comparison for now, Maple Leaf Foods’s ROCE is mediocre in absolute terms, considering the risk of investing in stocks versus the safety of a bank account. Investors may wish to consider higher-performing investments.

Our data shows that Maple Leaf Foods currently has an ROCE of 9.0%, compared to its ROCE of 0.3% 3 years ago. This makes us think the business might be improving.

TSX:MFI Past Revenue and Net Income, February 27th 2019
TSX:MFI Past Revenue and Net Income, February 27th 2019

It is important to remember that ROCE shows past performance, and is not necessarily predictive. ROCE can be deceptive for cyclical businesses, as returns can look incredible in boom times, and terribly low in downturns. This is because ROCE only looks at one year, instead of considering returns across a whole cycle. Future performance is what matters, and you can see analyst predictions in our free report on analyst forecasts for the company.

How Maple Leaf Foods’s Current Liabilities Impact Its ROCE

Liabilities, such as supplier bills and bank overdrafts, are referred to as current liabilities if they need to be paid within 12 months. Due to the way the ROCE equation works, having large bills due in the near term can make it look as though a company has less capital employed, and thus a higher ROCE than usual. To counter this, investors can check if a company has high current liabilities relative to total assets.

Maple Leaf Foods has total assets of CA$2.8b and current liabilities of CA$369m. Therefore its current liabilities are equivalent to approximately 13% of its total assets. This is a modest level of current liabilities, which would only have a small effect on ROCE.

What We Can Learn From Maple Leaf Foods’s ROCE

With that in mind, we’re not overly impressed with Maple Leaf Foods’s ROCE, so it may not be the most appealing prospect. Of course, you might find a fantastic investment by looking at a few good candidates. So take a peek at this free list of companies with modest (or no) debt, trading on a P/E below 20.

If you are like me, then you will not want to miss this free list of growing companies that insiders are buying.

We aim to bring you long-term focused research analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material.

If you spot an error that warrants correction, please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com. This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. Simply Wall St has no position in the stocks mentioned. Thank you for reading.

Advertisement