What You Must Know About Nordson Corporation’s (NASDAQ:NDSN) ROE

In this article:

Nordson Corporation (NASDAQ:NDSN) delivered an ROE of 27.05% over the past 12 months, which is an impressive feat relative to its industry average of 11.45% during the same period. On the surface, this looks fantastic since we know that NDSN has made large profits from little equity capital; however, ROE doesn’t tell us if management have borrowed heavily to make this happen. We’ll take a closer look today at factors like financial leverage to determine whether NDSN’s ROE is actually sustainable. View our latest analysis for Nordson

Breaking down ROE — the mother of all ratios

Return on Equity (ROE) is a measure of Nordson’s profit relative to its shareholders’ equity. For example, if the company invests $1 in the form of equity, it will generate $0.27 in earnings from this. While a higher ROE is preferred in most cases, there are several other factors we should consider before drawing any conclusions.

Return on Equity = Net Profit ÷ Shareholders Equity

ROE is measured against cost of equity in order to determine the efficiency of Nordson’s equity capital deployed. Its cost of equity is 10.11%. Given a positive discrepancy of 16.95% between return and cost, this indicates that Nordson pays less for its capital than what it generates in return, which is a sign of capital efficiency. ROE can be dissected into three distinct ratios: net profit margin, asset turnover, and financial leverage. This is called the Dupont Formula:

Dupont Formula

ROE = profit margin × asset turnover × financial leverage

ROE = (annual net profit ÷ sales) × (sales ÷ assets) × (assets ÷ shareholders’ equity)

ROE = annual net profit ÷ shareholders’ equity

NasdaqGS:NDSN Last Perf May 21st 18
NasdaqGS:NDSN Last Perf May 21st 18

Basically, profit margin measures how much of revenue trickles down into earnings which illustrates how efficient the business is with its cost management. Asset turnover reveals how much revenue can be generated from Nordson’s asset base. Finally, financial leverage will be our main focus today. It shows how much of assets are funded by equity and can show how sustainable the company’s capital structure is. Since financial leverage can artificially inflate ROE, we need to look at how much debt Nordson currently has. The debt-to-equity ratio currently stands at a balanced 122.81%, meaning the above-average ROE is due to its capacity to produce profit growth without a huge debt burden.

NasdaqGS:NDSN Historical Debt May 21st 18
NasdaqGS:NDSN Historical Debt May 21st 18

Next Steps:

ROE is a simple yet informative ratio, illustrating the various components that each measure the quality of the overall stock. Nordson’s above-industry ROE is encouraging, and is also in excess of its cost of equity. ROE is not likely to be inflated by excessive debt funding, giving shareholders more conviction in the sustainability of high returns. ROE is a helpful signal, but it is definitely not sufficient on its own to make an investment decision.

For Nordson, I’ve compiled three pertinent factors you should further examine:

  1. Financial Health: Does it have a healthy balance sheet? Take a look at our free balance sheet analysis with six simple checks on key factors like leverage and risk.

  2. Valuation: What is Nordson worth today? Is the stock undervalued, even when its growth outlook is factored into its intrinsic value? The intrinsic value infographic in our free research report helps visualize whether Nordson is currently mispriced by the market.

  3. Other High-Growth Alternatives : Are there other high-growth stocks you could be holding instead of Nordson? Explore our interactive list of stocks with large growth potential to get an idea of what else is out there you may be missing!


To help readers see pass the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned.

Advertisement