Q3 2023 BRP Group Inc Earnings Call
Participants
Bonnie Bishop; Executive Director of IR; BRP Group, Inc.
Bradford Lenzie Hale; CFO; BRP Group, Inc.
Kristopher Aaron Wiebeck; Chief Strategy Officer & Director; BRP Group, Inc.
Trevor L. Baldwin; CEO & Director; BRP Group, Inc.
Elyse Beth Greenspan; Director & Senior Analyst; Wells Fargo Securities, LLC, Research Division
Joshua David Shanker; MD; BofA Securities, Research Division
Meyer Shields; MD; Keefe, Bruyette, & Woods, Inc., Research Division
Pablo Augusto Serrano Singzon; Analyst; JPMorgan Chase & Co, Research Division
Sidney Schultz; Research Associate; Raymond James & Associates, Inc., Research Division
Yaron Joseph Kinar; Equity Analyst; Jefferies LLC, Research Division
Presentation
Operator
Greetings, and welcome to the BRP Group, Inc. Third Quarter 2023 Earnings Call. (Operator Instructions) As a reminder, this conference is being recorded. It is now my pleasure to introduce Bonnie Bishop, Executive Director, Investor Relations. Thank you. You may begin.
Bonnie Bishop
Thank you, operator. Welcome to the BRP Group's Third Quarter 2023 Earnings Call. Today's call is being recorded. Third quarter financial results, supplemental information and Form 10-Q were issued earlier this afternoon and are available on the company's website at ir.baldwinriskpartners.com.
Please note that remarks made today may include forward-looking statements subject to various assumptions, risks and uncertainties. The company's actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by such statements. For a more detailed discussion, please refer to the note regarding forward-looking statements in the company's earnings release and to our most recent Form 10-Q, both of which are available on the BRP website.
During the call today, the company may also discuss certain non-GAAP financial measures. For a more detailed discussion of these non-GAAP financial measures and historical reconciliation to the most closely comparable GAAP measures, please refer to the company's earnings release and supplemental information, both of which have been posted on the company's website at ir.baldwinriskpartners.com.
I will now turn the call over to Trevor Baldwin, CEO of BRP Group.
Trevor L. Baldwin
Good afternoon, and thank you for joining our third quarter earnings call. I'm joined this afternoon by Brad Hale, our Chief Financial Officer; Kris Wiebeck, our Chief Strategy Officer; and Bonnie Bishop, Executive Director of Investor Relations.
The robust underlying health, momentum and operating leverage in our business was evident in this quarter's results as we generated organic growth of 19% and approximately 480 basis points of margin accretion versus the third quarter of 2022 on the back of continued execution, growing contribution from prior investments and ongoing efforts to drive greater free cash flow from the business.
Adjusted diluted earnings per share was $0.29, up 61% from the third quarter of 2022. Adjusted EBITDA grew 53% to $64 million, resulting in an adjusted EBITDA margin of 21% for the quarter and free cash flow from operations grew by 29% to $76 million for the year-to-date period despite a $36 million increase in cash paid for interest year-over-year. Additionally, as a result of the growth in adjusted EBITDA during the quarter, leverage now sits at approximately 4.8x, representing meaningful progress over the last 12 months toward our goal of rapidly reducing leverage.
From an operating segment perspective, an Insurance Advisory Solutions, we generated organic growth of 11%. In the quarter, we saw increased client sensitivity to the significant insurance rate increases they have faced over the last 2 years, and we've experienced softer new business from project-related work in interest rate sensitive areas like construction and mergers and acquisitions. In other sectors where we have a significant presence, such as health care, we are seeing far less impact and overall, solid new business trends continue to drive outsized organic growth for our IAS platform relative to our peers.
In August, we added a fourth center of excellence to our IAS platform. Our new international center of excellence leverages our deep expertise to provide risk advisory and insurance solutions to clients with international operations and those exploring international expansion. The addition of this important capability enhances our overall value proposition to multinational businesses and along with increased levels of specialization from the launch of other centers of excellence and industry practice groups meaningfully expands the aperture of opportunities our risk advisers can confidently pursue.
Underwriting, Capacity & Technology Solutions grew 25% organically during the quarter, with strong performance from the MGA of the Future platform, which grew 29% and achieved record new business for the renters product line in July. Typically, the seasonally strongest month of the year. Homeowners also continues to exceed expectations with premium from our E&S and nonbuilder admitted products up over 200% from the third quarter of 2022.
We also launched 2 new products during the quarter, high-net-worth home and commercial property, both of which are starting to gain momentum. The significant investments we have made in UCTS over the past 24 months are continuing to drive further diversification and new revenue streams into the MGA, which we expect will drive durable and profitable growth long into the future.
Mainstreet Insurance Solutions delivered organic growth of 29%, driven by strong results in both the legacy Mainstreet business and Westwood. Despite some pressure in the housing market due to mortgage rates, new home sales have been resilient, and we continue to see strong attachment and insurance rate pull-through at Westwood. Additionally, the Mainstreet team has shown tremendous grit in navigating very challenging personal lines markets in large states such as Florida, Texas and California, where the personal lines insurance space continues to see significant rate increases.
We continue to be focused on delevering our balance sheet and on expanding margin across the business. To support those goals and enabled by the completion of our partnership integration work, we have begun executing on organizational alignment and cost-savings initiatives aimed at rationalizing and simplifying our growth services support structure to more fully align with our distinct go-to-market models and enable more nimble and effective client execution. We expect that these initiatives will provide greater operational efficiency and accelerate margin expansion and free cash flow growth beginning in 2024 and more fully into 2025.
On October 17, we announced the launch of Juniper Re, our new reinsurance broking platform. Juniper Re is a natural complement to our retail brokerage and MGA business, and helps round out our capabilities as a full-service broker. Juniper Re will be led by reinsurance broking veteran, Jeff Irvan, who has more than 25 years of global reinsurance broking experience. Reinsurance brokerage is a capability we have long had on our strategic road map because of its superior financial returns and integral position in the insurance ecosystem, and we jumped at the opportunity to launch this with a seasoned leader and team. We expect Juniper Re will begin contributing to revenue as early as the first quarter of 2024.
Lastly, we announced in our 10-Q that Kris Wiebeck, our Chief Strategy Officer and former Chief Financial Officer; and John Valentine, our Chief Partnership Officer, will be retiring at the end of this year. Kris will step down from our Board as part of his retirement. Their retirements align with a strategic road map that has been in place for a long period of time and included achieving our first set of post-IPO goals related to the scale and maturity of our business. Kris and John have made enormous contributions to BRP and have mentored scores of colleagues who are now key contributors. On behalf of BRP, I'd like to thank Kris and John for their tireless work through the years in building BRP from a small Tampa-based agency to the national firm that it is today.
In summary, and as this quarter's results once again proved out, BRP remains a diversified, well-balanced business that is built to perform and deliver industry-leading growth through the various economic and industry rate cycles. As you saw this quarter, our business has meaningful operating leverage. And as we continue to earn into the past investments and maintain our committed focus on targeted expense efficiency actions, we expect margins will continue to expand meaningfully over time. I'd like to thank our colleagues for their tenacious efforts to deliver innovative solutions for our clients, helping them navigate a challenging insurance marketplace. I also want to thank our clients for their continued trust and confidence in us.
With that, I will turn it over to Brad, who will detail our financial results.
Bradford Lenzie Hale
Thanks, Trevor, and good afternoon, everyone. For the third quarter, we generated organic revenue growth of 19% and $306 million of total revenue. As Trevor mentioned, we generated organic growth in the quarter of 11% at IAS, 25% at UCTS, and 29% at MIS. We recorded a GAAP net loss for the third quarter of $32 million or GAAP diluted loss per share of $0.29. Adjusted net income for the third quarter, which excludes share-based compensation, amortization and other onetime expenses, was $33.8 million or $0.29 per fully diluted share. A table reconciling GAAP net loss to adjusted net income can be found in our earnings release and our 10-Q filed with the SEC.
Adjusted EBITDA for the third quarter rose 53% to $64 million compared to $41.9 million in the prior year period. Adjusted EBITDA margin was 21% for the quarter compared to 16% in the prior year period. This margin expansion highlights the significant operating leverage that exists in our business which we've achieved through our continued organic growth against the backdrop of our ongoing absorption of prior year investments, which continue to earn in and perform as expected.
Additionally, as Trevor mentioned, we have begun executing on organizational alignment and cost-savings initiatives aimed at the rationalization and simplification of our growth services support structure to more fully align with our go-to-market approach and drive enhanced client execution. Specifically, we expect a $10 million in-year benefit from these initiatives in 2024.
In the third quarter, we paid $36 million in earn-outs and our remaining estimated undiscounted earn-out obligations total approximately $332 million. In September, we opportunistically executed a fungible add-on to our Term Loan B with proceeds used to pay down our revolver leaving us with approximately $270 million of capacity on our $600 million revolving credit facility.
After Q1 2025, when we have finished paying the vast majority of our earn-outs, we expect significantly higher free cash flow generation and the potential for more rapid delevering. As Trevor stated, delevering is a critical component to increasing free cash flow, and we remain committed to doing so. We expect our net leverage will continue to decrease through the end of 2023, and our goal is to delever to 4x by the end of 2024, a target which includes 2024 estimated earn-out payments of approximately $135 million. In addition, given the current interest rate environment, we are adjusting our target net leverage range to 3 to 4x down from 3.5 to 4.5x, which implies incremental deleveraging into 2025.
For the fourth quarter of 2023, we expect revenue of $275 million to $285 million, organic growth of 12% to 14%, and adjusted EBITDA between $40 million and $45 million, and adjusted EPS of $0.10 to $0.12 per share, bringing expectations for the full year of 2023 to revenue of $1.21 billion to $1.22 billion, organic growth of high teens and adjusted EBITDA of $245 million to $250 million.
The update to our prior full year guidance is primarily a result of start-up costs related to the launch of Juniper Re, a conservative view towards loss ratios sensitive contingents, and the continuation of lower project-based insurance revenue in IAS, which began to manifest in Q3. We expect Q4 to include compensation expense for portions of our maturing earn-outs that the prior shareholders at their full discretion allocate to non-shareholders of the previously sold businesses.
This is an accounting nuance whereby only prior owners can receive portions of the earn-out that would be characterized as consideration for the business acquired. This expense, if applicable, will be a direct offset to the change in contingent consideration and neutral to the Q4 income statement. We are highlighting the matter because any compensation charge related to this will be included in our reconciliation of net income to adjusted EBITDA, so that the impact on adjusted EBITDA is also net neutral.
For partners whose earn-out matures in Q4, the compensation expense is a maximum of $15 million, subject to the full discretion of the former shareholders. Given that we are not hosting an Investor Day in late November as we had last year, we are sharing an initial view for 2024 financial expectations. We expect revenue of $1.38 billion to $1.42 billion, which implies organic growth towards the upper end of our long-term range of 10% to 15%, adjusted EBITDA of $320 million to $335 million and expected free cash flow from operations of $170 million to $200 million.
In closing, I would echo Trevor's comments regarding the state of our business heading into 2024 and beyond. The capital we have prudently allocated into our operating groups over the last 3 years has positioned us for continued outsized growth at scale and to more meaningfully drive margin accretion, free cash flow expansion and continued deleveraging.
We will now take questions. Operator?
Question and Answer Session
Operator
(Operator Instructions) Our first question comes from the line of Greg Peters with Raymond James.
Sidney Schultz
This is Sid on for Greg. So we've heard some stress in the PE-backed roll-ups with higher interest costs and earn-outs. So hoping you could provide an update on what you're seeing in the M&A market.
Trevor L. Baldwin
Yes, Sid, this is Trevor. What I would say is M&A volume is down substantially. The buyer mix has shifted with the large lowly levered publicly traded buyers such as Arthur J. Gallagher, really being able to take advantage of the current dynamic.
I'd say we definitely have noticed a number of sponsor-backed peers who have chosen to take on pretty expensive synthetic capital in the form of preferreds that have kind of high teens to low 20s all-in costs associated with them. What I'd say is it's kind of unclear to me, the corporate finance logic behind deploying that capital into M&A at double-digit multiples, which is where deals are still transacting at. So from our perspective, based on where the M&A market is today, where the cost of capital is, our best use of proceeds is continuing to focus on delevering the business and investing in our continued outsized organic growth.
We think there's a chance to the extent rates stay higher for longer that the stress amongst some of the more highly levered private brokers will become more pronounced, and it will create accelerated opportunities for us to attract really top-tier talent. And I'd say, we've seen a little bit of that transpire already this year with several teams of really kind of high capability and unique industry sectors coming over and bring terrific expertise and driving real momentum for us.
Sidney Schultz
Okay. Yes. Got that. And then I wanted to pivot to your homeowners-related products. I know you talked about some stress in the personal lines markets in some of the larger states, but hoping you could talk about more about what you're seeing there and then also how you've been able to navigate the dislocations in those markets.
Trevor L. Baldwin
Yes. So I think it's not a surprise to anybody. The personal lines market, particularly in the homeowners side, around cat-exposed states such as Florida, Texas, California are experiencing significant pressure, both from a pricing and capacity standpoint. And so our teams are doing incredible work helping our clients navigate those challenging marketplaces and sourcing capacity to solve their challenges. I think, in particular, this is where our MGA of the Future platform creates a real competitive advantage via our ability to build proprietary products, source capacity directly from the reinsurance markets and bring that much-needed capacity to market solving those challenges for our clients.
So as I mentioned earlier in the call, our nonbuilder admitted and E&S home products, which we launched at the beginning of last year were up 200% in premium for the quarter. We continue to see fantastic momentum and uptake, and we're very excited about the continued trajectory we're seeing there. Not only is it a really terrific growth driver for the MGA business, but it also provides much-needed capacity in our Mainstreet business and gives us the ability to go to both builder and mortgage channel partners with a unique value proposition of being able to deliver capacity that is very scarce in the marketplace.
Operator
Our next question comes from the line of Elyse Greenspan with Wells Fargo.
Elyse Beth Greenspan
For my first question, within Insurance Advisory Solutions, you guys highlighted some headwinds. I think, Trevor, you called out construction and M&A slowdown. Can you just give us a greater sense of how impactful that was in the quarter in terms of organic growth in that business? And then what are you expecting from organic growth within IAS in the fourth quarter as well as in the guide that you guys gave us for 2024?
Trevor L. Baldwin
Yes. Elyse, happy to. So a few things. One, in the IAS segment as we looked at the pressure we saw from interest rate-sensitive project-based revenues such as construction, we definitely had a noticeable pullback. The exact -- the rough impact is about 300 basis points to organic growth for the segment. So if you exclude the impact of the pullback in project-related revenue tied to construction, the IAS segment would have grown about 14% organically.
We are carrying forward via kind of a conservative view, a similar impact into our expectation for the fourth quarter and full year of 2024. What I would also say, though, is that doesn't really tell the whole picture. When you look at our construction practice more broadly, we are winning new clients at a record rate for our business, and the underlying momentum we're continuing to see in new business is very encouraging.
So I don't want to leave you concerned that we're overly concerned around the trajectory and momentum. In fact, I'd say it's the opposite. And this is the entire thesis around our business that I think we've talked about from the very beginning, which is we're building a business capable of growing double digits through the cycle. And despite the weakness in certain and select pockets, because of the strength in new business and the overall momentum, we're able to power through that with continued double-digit growth.
Elyse Beth Greenspan
Okay. And then in terms of the when you're talking about your guidance for next year, it seems like you're not including any M&A within that $1.38 billion to $1.42 billion revenue guide. Correct me if I'm wrong. And if that's the assumption, would 2025 be when you guys would expect to return to M&A activity?
Trevor L. Baldwin
Yes. Elyse, that's correct. We don't expect any meaningful M&A activity in 2024. As you heard Brad outlined, we're adjusting our leverage policy down from 3.5 to 4.5 to 3 to 4. We expect via the nearly 100% growth in free cash flow as well as the 300 basis points of expected adjusted EBITDA margin expansion that we're going to rapidly delever the business next year while continuing to satisfy the earn-out liabilities.
So we expect to be able to delever by a full turn, and that kind of has us entering into 2025 as a very different business than where we sit today from both a free cash flow potential perspective, a leverage perspective, and that creates a ton of capital flexibility for us at that time. But for the time being, based on where the cost of capital is, we believe it's prudent to focus our efforts on continuing to expand margin and delever the business through 2024.
Elyse Beth Greenspan
And then just want to -- I guess, last question. I think you mentioned from the savings effort, there should be about a $10 million in-year benefit in '24. Just want to verify that number. And then it seems like with your guidance, you're assuming around 300 basis points of margin improvement next year. Is that what you guys are expecting there as well?
Trevor L. Baldwin
Yes. The $10 million is correct, Elyse. And we are expecting about 300 basis points of margin accretion next year.
Operator
Our next question comes from the line of Yaron Kinar with Jefferies.
Yaron Joseph Kinar
I want to dig in a little deeper into the Juniper Re initiative. I guess, what I'm trying to get to here is, from my understanding, building a reinsurance broker can be challenging, especially when you need pretty significant scale. So how are you thinking about that? And do you believe that it can be earnings or EPS accretive in short order despite what could be a significant investment in the platform?
Trevor L. Baldwin
Yes. Yaron, great question. We're very excited about the launch of Juniper Re. As I mentioned earlier, we've long had in our strategic road map the reinsurance broking capabilities as a result of both of its superior financial returns, but also the integral role it plays in the insurance value chain. So there's just -- there's an immense amount of strategic value to us having that capability added in amongst our retail broking and MGA capabilities. .
As we think about the payback period here, we think it's going to be relatively short. And there's a few reasons for that. But one, Jeff Irvan, 25-year veteran, deep relationships, is building a world-class team. And so they come with built-in relationships and they've done this before. So they're not having to learn how to do it again.
Second, we have significant relationships across our business that yield real reinsurance broking revenues that we believe we'll be able to take advantage of. And so while we do believe that this will be a negative EBITDA business for us in 2024, we have line of sight to it being EPS accretive and cash flow positive in 2025. And that's roughly how we're thinking about it, which is a very rapid payback period for an endeavor of this nature, as you mentioned.
Yaron Joseph Kinar
Yes, definitely. And are you looking at targeting specific slices of the reinsurance market with us? I'm assuming that or maybe I shouldn't assume this, but will you be going after kind of smaller scale reinsurers or will you be going after some of the large multinational accounts as well?
Trevor L. Baldwin
Yes. I'd say, initially, we're going to be focused on kind of specialty treaty business out the gate, where we've got deep expertise around cat property programs to say the least. But we envision kind of the strategic expansion of broad capabilities and specialization to serve all major segments in this market over time.
Yaron Joseph Kinar
Okay. One final one. Is Juniper Re going to be in one of the existing segments? Or will you be carving out a separate segment for it?
Trevor L. Baldwin
It will be in the UCTS segment.
Operator
Our next question comes from the line of Josh Shanker with Bank of America.
Joshua David Shanker
Yes. Look, people make life changes and I'd like to a little bit more about them. I mean, Kris and John are pretty young guys. Can you talk a little bit about what you said was a long time in the works their plans to depart the company so we can understand how that proceeded?
Trevor L. Baldwin
Yes. Josh, so Kris is actually here with me. So happy to have him chime in as well. But when we took the company public, Kris and John, and I, about 1.5 weeks before that, we're at an industry event sponsored by The Council of Insurance Agents & Brokers called the Insurance Leadership Forum. It's an event that happens every October, where the leadership of kind of the top 200 brokers around the country and the top 100 to 150 insurance companies, come together and spend time planning how we can solve challenges for our clients, create solutions, et cetera. .
And as we were walking around that event, we observed to each other how we were the youngest ones there. And Kris and John said to me, that's one of our competitive advantages. We've got -- we have the kind of tenacity and the drive not only to take on big challenges, but to run fast and execute. And they said, we never want to be not the youngest people here.
And so the commitment they made at that time is we're going to continue to recruit an incredible bench of talent. We're going to mentor them and make sure that BRP is always known for having fresh, highly competent, highly capable, energetic talent. And so that's what we've done. And we work through a series of goals that we'd set out for Kris and John, and we've achieved those and frankly, more.
And so I'm excited for them to enter that next chapter of their lives and spend more time with families and pursuing charitable endeavors. But they'll continue to be close friends of the firm. And as you'll see, we also have multiyear consulting agreements with them so that they'll continue to be able to provide us with their fantastic thoughts and expertise. But Kris, why don't you just share a little bit in your own words?
Kristopher Aaron Wiebeck
Josh, appreciate it. Always nice to be appreciated. When you think about some of the goals post-IPO, if you look at the guidance we've issued for next year, we basically 10x revenue. That was one of our goals. If you look at what we've done in the IAS business, that's now a national platform. If you go back to the first question in [Q&A], there's some real distress happening in the private equity broker side.
If rates stay higher, some of them have PIK interest, accruing interest. I read a Moody's report the other day, someone is over $1 billion of kid of unpaid interest that's picking ahead of equity. There's probably going to be a lot of stress there. And so in that world, some of where John and I focused a lot on M&A is probably more, as Trevor said, organic hiring from people that are looking for a solid ship through the storm.
And I think BRP is really well-positioned for that. If you go back to our MIS business, at the time of the IPO, I think Goosehead certainly held the best Mainstreet focused, personal lines focused, fast growing. You look at where that business is today for us with Westwood with what we're doing in Charlotte, we're relatively the same size, relatively the same metrics on growth in margin as they are.
And then if you look at our UCTS segment, and what's happened in the MGA, we had a fantastic renters business. That business is still fantastic today. It's now a business that is launching new product and it is a broad-based platform. So for John and I, on a business standpoint, you look at our post-IPO goals, and we were really able to check the box on every single one of them. Feel like the company is super well-positioned.
And then on the personal side, I'm actually going to coach my son's flag football team next week. He told me I've never been able to coach a team that he's played on. He's 7 years old. And so there's a unique opportunity we have. Our kids are still at home, and we're going to get to spend some time doing things that when you're working 90 to 100 hours a week, you can't do. And we get to make up some of that time.
So we're really excited for the opportunity to spend some extra time with our family. I know John feels the same way about that. And we're just really grateful for Trevor and the team. We did recruit a lot of people here, and it's a fantastic platform and business. And we really think it has a super bright future ahead as some of the guidance and you look forward into '24 and '25, I think it becomes quite evident.
Joshua David Shanker
And this is a real quick one. And by the way, good luck with everything. That sounds terrific. Just a quick one. The organic growth in the company was faster than the overall growth. Was there a disposition of something during the quarter?
Bradford Lenzie Hale
Yes, it was part of purchase accounting adjustments related to a prior year partnership, Josh, that was our single partnership in Q3 of last year.
Operator
Our next question comes from the line of Pablo Singzon with JPMorgan.
Pablo Augusto Serrano Singzon
First question, I was wondering if there are upfront charges to consider that will match the $10 million in-year benefit you're expecting in '24?
Bradford Lenzie Hale
We expect to incur some charges in Q4, Pablo, that will get booked through severance expense. But the $10 million mark is anticipated savings in the '24 guidance that we provided.
Pablo Augusto Serrano Singzon
Okay. And then secondly, Brad, on cash interest expense. It sounds like maybe delevering happens and by that, I mean that going down, the absolute amount seems like more like a '25 event. Would it be fair to assume that cash interest expense stays roughly the same, assuming no material change in the interest rate environment?
Bradford Lenzie Hale
Yes. We modeled cash interest expense at approximately $120 million next year, Pablo, under the assumption that rates stay consistent with where they are today.
Pablo Augusto Serrano Singzon
Got it. And then maybe this one for Trevor. I was wondering how much for pricing tailwind you're getting in the personal lines market. Would it be fair to assume that it's larger than what you're getting commercial lines at this point?
Trevor L. Baldwin
It is, Pablo. So if we look at the combined impact of rate and exposure on the business in Q3, it was about 2.3% which is actually down from around 4% on the first half of the year. And as you parse through that, what I would say is the IAS business was actually lower than that. The MIS business would have been higher than that. And so we're getting close to, if not slightly above double-digit rate on the personal line side. Whereas we're getting at this point, largely through some contraction in exposures, we saw manifest in the third quarter, as I already talked about low single-digit impact and tailwind in the IAS business.
Pablo Augusto Serrano Singzon
Got it. That makes sense. And then last for me, I don't think it's an issue for you, but just be curious to hear how the balance sheets that are paired up against the MGA decision right now, just given what's happening on the personal line side, some states insurers just don't have appetite to write, but it doesn't seem like an issue for you. But I'd be curious to hear what you're seeing on that side of the business.
Trevor L. Baldwin
Yes. I mean, Pablo, we have the good fortune of having broad-based support from a large panel of blue chip reinsurers that you would know very well. We just finished our flood renewal on improved terms. And we feel really good about our capacity situation, and that's a testament to the underwriting-first approach that our MGA team takes and the terrific and consistent -- consistently industry-leading loss ratios that our product lines are generating.
And so we understand in the MGA business, we've got multiple stakeholders, and we've got to deliver consistently profitable business to our capacity providers while also providing competitive solutions and products that meet the unique and bespoke needs of our clients in the market. And our MGA team is really striking that balance incredibly well.
Operator
(Operator Instructions) Our next question comes from the line of Meyer Shields with KBW.
Meyer Shields
Great. So a lot, obviously, to digest tonight. Trevor, in your comment you talked about conservative or maybe it's Brad, I apologize, about a conservative look at fourth quarter contingent commissions. I was hoping you could go a little bit deeper in there in terms of which lines of business have, I guess, less certain contingents.
Trevor L. Baldwin
Yes. So Meyer, this is Trevor. What you're seeing there is a conservative view of a few loss ratio sensitive contingent contracts on the personal line side where we're taking a conservative viewpoint. Over the past couple of years, we've been doing a ton of work to kind of create master contracts with our core trading partners and generally convert those contracts from contingent loss ratio based payouts to what we would consider to be GSCs or guaranteed supplemental commissions.
And as you've looked at the supplemental commission and contingent commission growth we've experienced over the past couple of years, it's largely on the back of that. There's still some loss ratio sensitive contracts and considering just kind of where certain of those are performing largely tied to convective storm activity across the U.S. We just felt it was prudent to take a conservative view.
Meyer Shields
Okay. Is there any way of ballparking, I'm sorry, that issues impact, like the change in view on the fourth quarter adjusted EBITDA?
Trevor L. Baldwin
Yes, I attribute a few million dollars to that.
Operator
There are no further questions in the queue. I'd like to hand the call back to management for closing remarks.
Trevor L. Baldwin
Thank you all for joining us this evening. And I want to thank our nearly 4,000 colleagues for their hard work and dedication. I also want to thank our clients for their continued trust and confidence in our teams. Thank you all very much, and we look forward to speaking with you again next quarter.
Operator
Ladies and gentlemen, this does conclude today's teleconference. Thank you for your participation. You may disconnect your lines at this time, and have a wonderful day.
