Q4 2023 Stratasys Ltd Earnings Call

In this article:

Participants

Eitan Zamir; CFO; Stratasys Ltd.

Yoav Zeif; CEO; Stratasys Ltd.

Yonah Lloyd; CCO & VP of IR; Stratasys Ltd.

Ananda Prosad Baruah; MD; Loop Capital Markets LLC, Research Division

Blake Stuart Keating; Research Analyst; William Blair & Company L.L.C., Research Division

Danny James Eggerichs; Associate Analyst; Craig-Hallum Capital Group LLC, Research Division

Jacob Michael Stephan; Senior Research Analyst; Lake Street Capital Markets, LLC, Research Division

James Andrew Ricchiuti; Senior Analyst; Needham & Company, LLC, Research Division

Troy Donavon Jensen; Research Analyst; Cantor Fitzgerald & Co., Research Division

Presentation

Operator

Good day, and welcome to today's conference to discuss Stratasys' Fourth Quarter and Full Year 2023 Financial Results. My name is Kevin, and I'll be your operator for today's call. A question-and-answer session will follow the formal presentation. (Operator Instructions)
And now, I'd like to turn the call over to Yonah Lloyd, Chief Communications Officer and Vice President, Investor Relations for Stratasys. Mr. Lloyd, please go ahead.

Yonah Lloyd

Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us to discuss our 2023 fourth quarter and full year financial results. On the call with us today are our CEO, Dr. Yoav Zeif; and our CFO, Eitan Zamir. I would like to remind you that access to today's call, including the slide presentation, is available online at the web address provided in our press release. In addition, a replay of today's call, including access to the slide presentation, will be available and can be accessed through the Investor Relations section of our website.
Please note that some of the information you will hear during our discussion today will consist of forward-looking statements, including, without limitation, those regarding our expectations as to our future revenue, gross margin, operating expenses, taxes, and other future financial performance, and our expectations for our business outlook. All statements that speak to future performance, events, expectations or results are forward-looking statements. Actual results or trends could differ materially from our forecast. For risks that could cause actual results to be materially different from those set forth in forward-looking statements, please refer to the risk factors discussed or referenced in Stratasys' annual reports on Form 20-F for the 2022 year and for the 2023 year, the latter of which will be filed with the SEC in the coming few days.
Please also refer to our operating and financial review and prospects for 2022 and 2023, which are included as Item 5 of our annual reports on Form 20-F for 2022 and 2023. Please also see the press release that announces our earnings for the fourth quarter of 2023, which is attached as Exhibit 99.1 to a report on Form 6-K that we are furnishing to the SEC today. Stratasys assumes no obligation to update any forward-looking statements or information which speak as of their respective dates.
As in previous quarters, today's call will include GAAP and non-GAAP financial measures. The non-GAAP financial measures should be read in combination with our GAAP metrics to evaluate our performance. Non-GAAP to GAAP reconciliations are provided in tables in our slide presentation and today's press release.
I will now turn the call over to our Chief Executive Officer, Dr. Yoav Zeif. Yoav? Thank you, Yonah. Good morning, everyone, and thank you for joining us. In the fourth quarter, we once again demonstrated that the diversity of our offerings and the strength of our go-to-market operations can deliver profitable results. We achieved these results in what has continued to be a CapEx-constrained environment for our customers and a challenging chapter for our industry.
I am particularly pleased to report that we delivered another record quarter of consumables revenue, a testament to strong usage of our systems. We also achieved our 10th consecutive quarter of profitability on an adjusted basis, which reflects the discipline of our business model that differentiates us in our sector.
Stratasys is laying the foundation for meaningful use cases that will significantly contribute to our financial performance. Our suite of offerings features best-in-class technologies that allow our customers to advance their use of additive manufacturing and increasingly broaden applications into manufacturing at scale.
As our new branding states, we make additive work for our customers, and we see that playing out every day, whether it is the strong utilization of systems they purchased from us in the past or in the continued high level of engagement we see today for new systems incorporating cutting-edge technologies. As the macro business environment continue to improve and capital spending patterns return to normal, we expect the pent-up demand to reaccelerate growth, particularly in our system sales.
We delivered solid revenues in 2023 of $628 million, down 3.7% versus 2022, but up 1.3% after excluding the MakerBot divestiture and the 2 businesses we divested from our Stratasys Direct service bureau, showing remarkable resilience against a severely CapEx-constrained environment for our customers.
We improved our gross margin for the year despite the modest change in revenues, reflecting our focus on cost controls and operating efficiencies. And we delivered $0.11 in adjusted EPS in 2023. We are confident that as our new technologies ramp and our operational efficiencies continue, gross margins and profitability will strengthen in 2024 and beyond.
We continued to maintain a healthy balance sheet that provides stability through challenging times and optionality to support our growth through both organic investment and accretive acquisition opportunities. And as we shared each year, in 2023, we generated 34% of our revenues from manufacturing, up from 32.5% in 2022. We expect to see this metric grow stronger as global business conditions improve to a point where the majority of our business will come from end-part manufacturing at scale.
Now let me touch on some of our success stories for the quarter, starting with our industrial business. 35 years ago, our founder, Scott Crump, invented FDM 3D printing, which remains by far the industry's most popular technology. Since its introduction, Stratasys has consistently been the leader for industrial FDM manufacturing. And in the fourth quarter, we brought another major technology innovation to market with the F3300 printer, our first FDM printer on a platform designed to support scalable production.
The F3300 doubles the speed of existing technology with greater reliability and operating efficiency, while being geared toward manufacturing at higher volumes. We worked closely with our customers for several years to deliver this new system and are proud that Toyota is our first customer. The F3300 can be used for production of parts, fixtures and prototyping applications to help bring new products to market faster.
Our F3300 pipeline is strong with accelerating interest and engagement levels, and we look forward to sharing more customers win. Also in automotive, we recently launched an initiative to help Daimler Truck North America produce more manufacturing support parts and functional prototypes by adding our H350 system paired with GrabCAD Print Pro to their existing portfolio of Stratasys printers.
Daimler expects to see significant improvement in their prototyping and a shift to manufacturing starting this year. Our Neo line of stereolithography printers had a strong finish to the year, including orders from Whirlpool and multiple service bureau in the U.S. and Europe. And already in 2024, PartsToGo, a German service bureau, that had 2 Neo printers, purchased 4 more systems, enabling them to produce high quality, accurate and repeatable parts for their customer's industrial level application needs.
We also made further inroads in the Formula One racing community with multiunit sales of Neo SLA systems to Toyota, F1 McLaren, and other industry leaders for use in wind-tunnel testing and tooling. This is particularly promising in that it demonstrates our technology's ability to deliver accuracy, consistency and reliability at the highest level of automotive standards. We expect this will result in transferability to mainstream automotive manufacturing.
While the Neo system is exciting for its use in prototyping and tooling today, the real competitive advantage will come with the next version expected in 2025, which will shift the focus of that technology to end-part manufacturing. Further on in automotive, we increased our exposure to automotive interior design with our PolyJet technology through collaboration with Mercedes Benz, Maserati, Volkswagen and Stellantis. All in all, we are on the path for what we believe will be serial production use cases for the automotive industry.
Next, I'd like to provide some highlights on our dental applications and key milestones. Dental continues to be one of the largest and most exciting growth avenue for the 3D printing industry, and for Stratasys in particular. As a reminder, our activities are focused on dentures and other non-discretionary restorative spending. In 2023, dental continued to grow, and we expect this trend to accelerate. This growth came 2 ways. First, we further expanded our customers base with new product offerings to address a broader range of applications in a more economically beneficial way, including dentures, implant models, surgical guides, and other parts used in fixed restoration cases.
Our TrueDent solution rolled out during the first quarter of 2023 is a great example of how customers can use 3D printing to replace conventional manufacturing technologies. Pairing TrueDent resins and workflows with our J5 DentaJet printers allows the creation of a full permanent monolithic denture. No other technology in the world is able to provide this at scale. This steering also enable us to lower production cost and labor for labs by more than 50%, while improving form, fit and function for the patient.
Leading labs, networks and dental support organizations, or DSOs, in the U.S. and Europe, who are new customer for Stratasys, have begun deploying this offering to better serve their patients and have provided us with excellent feedback on clinical outcome and patient satisfaction. As a real life example of just how disruptive and impactful TrueDent is, last month, we announced our partnership with Express Dental of Oklahoma at a 2-day event where dental services are provided for free to those in need.
Over 55 people had their mouth scanned on the first day, and the very next day went home with a brand-new set of dentures, courtesy of TrueDent. This level of speed, accuracy and low cost has never been possible at scale until today. We plan to roll out new business models and partnerships to help accelerate adoption of additive manufacturing in dentistry, and expect this business to meaningfully accelerate in the years to come as we continue to win business from conventional manufacturing.
And second, we delivered growth in dental through our existing customers, expanding their fleets and increasing utilization of our resins on our newest platform. This was a significant contribution to our revenue growth in consumables in 2023.
Now switching to medical, where some of the most exciting opportunities for future growth are being developed. During the quarter, we announced a partnership with Siemens Healthineers to carry out a landmark research project. This project is designed to develop new state-of-the-art solutions for the advancement of medical imaging phantoms for computed tomography imaging. These are used around the world to evaluate and ensure optimal performance of CT scanners.
We also announced that the University Hospital Birmingham in England has been using tailored 3D printing cutting guides to improve surgical outcomes for head and neck cancer patients, produced exclusively using our J5 MediJet printer. This success demonstrates that our technology enables the creation of vital, highly accurate, patient-specific cutting guides ahead of surgical procedures, and I would be remiss if I didn't express my pride in Stratasys winning the medical, dental or healthcare application category at the [Prestige] 3D Printing Industry Awards in London in December, where our J5 DentaJet, Medijet and J850 Digital Anatomy printers beat out a field of 9 competitors.
Turning to software. We have a long-term plan to monetize our software offering and create new streams of recurring revenue by adding value through new features and products to our free GrabCAD platform, both for use with our own systems and for those who partner with us. In 2023, we demonstrated early success in our channel's ability to sell software alongside new printers. A major attribute for the new software is the ability to help service bureaus and internal 3D print shops rapidly and accurately estimate the cost and time of printed parts. And we have intensified our effort to expand a subscription software business with the Pro version of our popular GrabCAD software.
GrabCAD Print is used by over 85% of our customers and over 40,000 users worldwide. GrabCAD Print Pro is targeted at helping users achieve 3D printing that is faster, more accurate and more economical with the ability to print multiple parts for multiple customers on multiple printers simultaneously. GrabCAD Print Pro is currently available on FDM and SAF systems. And a few days ago, we announced we are now in the process of adding it to PolyJet. We expect to support it across our full suite of technology offerings once we add it to the P3 and Neo in the future.
And turning to new materials. We have recently announced our Origin One DLP system, which is building a leading position for production of manufacturing aids, particularly in the automotive industry. We recently introduced our new Somos WeatherX 100 material. This is our first material using SAE automotive industry standards that is tested for weatherability, UV, durability and dimensional accuracy. With the introduction of this and additional material during 2024, we plan to strengthen our position in DLP and open more manufacturing use cases.
Before I turn the call over to our CFO, Eitan Zamir, a word regarding the strategic review we announced in the third quarter of 2023. The comprehensive process is ongoing, and our Board of Directors is considering and evaluating all avenues to maximize value. As we announced previously, we do not intend to disclose further developments on the strategic review process unless and until we determine that such disclosure is appropriate or necessary.
To sum up, even against a challenging backdrop, we continue to deliver differentiated products and solutions to customers across a wide array of end users, setting the stage for increased growth based on accelerated adoption of additive manufacturing as macroeconomic conditions improve.
I will now turn the call over to Eitan to share the financial results and our initial outlook for 2024. Eitan?

Eitan Zamir

Thank you, Yoav, and good morning, everyone. We achieved solid results in the fourth quarter against what has continued to be a challenging backdrop of adverse macroeconomic factors and related pressures. We are confident that the high level of demand we are seeing in our customer engagements will translate into meaningful growth once these headwinds abate. In general, our results demonstrate the resilience our diversified portfolio provides, which led to our 10th consecutive quarter of profitability.
Now let me dive deeper into the numbers. I will note that after a number of years of volatility, the impact of currency on year-over-year comparisons for 2023 was much more muted. As such, I won't be highlighting comparisons in constant currency. For the fourth quarter, consolidated revenue of $156.3 million was down 1.9% as compared to the same period last year, but was up 1.3% when adjusted for the divestitures of our metal and urethane businesses from the Stratasys Direct service bureau.
Product revenue in the fourth quarter declined by 0.7% to $110.4 million compared to the same period last year. Within product revenue, system revenue was down by 13.7% to $47.4 million compared to the same period last year as constrained capital budgets continue to impact customer buying behavior for new systems. Consumables revenue was up by 11.9% in the fourth quarter as compared to the same period last year to a new record of $63 million. The increase reflects continued strong utilization of our customers' existing systems and contribution from the acquisition of Covestro in April 2023.
Service revenue was $45.9 million for the fourth quarter of 2023, down 4.6% as compared to the same period last year. Excluding the divestitures that took place in our Stratasys Direct business, service revenue grew 3.6% year-over-year. Within service revenue, customer support revenue grew by 1.6% compared to the same period last year, continuing to reflect solid utilization of existing systems. For the full year 2023, consolidated revenue was down by 3.7% as compared to 2022, but was up 1.3% when accounting for the impact of the MakerBot and Stratasys Direct service bureau divestitures.
Product revenue in 2023 decreased by 4.1% and was down by 1.1%, excluding the MakerBot divestment. The decline compared to 2022 is primarily due to a reduction in hardware sales that more than offset record consumables. Within product revenue, system revenue in 2023 decreased by 16.4% compared to 2022. Consumable revenue was another record, up by 8.2% in 2023 compared to 2022. For the full year of 2023, service revenue declined by 2.8% compared to 2022, and was up 1.3% after backing out the 2 Stratasys Direct divestitures. Within service revenue, customer support revenue in 2023 was up by 4.5% compared to 2022, reflecting continued strong utilization of existing systems by our customers.
Now turning to gross margins. GAAP gross margin was 44.7% for the quarter compared to 43.1% for the same period last year. Non-GAAP gross margin was 48.8% for the quarter compared to 48.4% for the same period last year. The year-over-year improvement in gross margin was the result of better contribution from Stratasys Direct, including higher margins for the lower revenue that resulted from divesting the 2 businesses from Stratasys Direct, as well as improvement in freight, which more than offset lower hardware gross margin.
GAAP gross margin was 42.5% for the full year 2023 compared to 42.4% for the same period last year. Non-GAAP gross margin improved 20 basis points to 48.2% for the full year as compared to 48% in 2022. The full year improvement in non-GAAP gross margin was a result of better contribution from consumables and Stratasys Direct, along with lower shipping costs which more than offset lower hardware contributions.
GAAP operating expenses were $64.1 million for the quarter compared to $67.1 million during the same period last year, reflecting the reduction of M&A-related liabilities, elimination of operating expenses of the 2 Stratasys Direct divested businesses. Non-GAAP operating expenses were $74.3 million for the quarter compared to $72 million during the same period last year. Non-GAAP operating expenses were 47.5% of revenue for the quarter compared to 45.2% for the same period last year, driven primarily by our acquisition of Covestro.
For the full year, non-GAAP operating expenses were 46.2% of revenue as compared to 45.9% in 2022, primarily due to lower revenue. In absolute dollar terms, non-GAAP operating expenses were $8.8 million lower as compared to 2022 due in part to the divestiture of MakerBot, lower commission and currency exchange-related costs, partially offset by the addition of Covestro and higher merit compensation.
Regarding our consolidated earnings for the quarter. GAAP operating income for the quarter was $5.7 million compared to operating income of $1.6 million for the same period last year. Non-GAAP operating income for the quarter was $2 million compared to $5.1 million for the same period last year. The decrease reflects the higher OpEx as a percentage of revenue.
GAAP net loss for the quarter was $15 million or $0.22 per diluted share compared to a net loss of $2.4 million or $0.04 per diluted share for the same period last year. Non-GAAP net income for the quarter was $1.6 million or $0.02 per diluted share compared to a net income of $4.6 million or $0.07 per diluted share in the same period last year. Adjusted EBITDA was $7.7 million for the quarter compared to $10.7 million in the same period last year.
Regarding our consolidated earnings for the full year 2023. GAAP operating loss was $87.6 million compared to a loss of $57.2 million for 2022. The wider loss reflects $32.9 million of the onetime advisor costs related to M&A activities, as well as various onetime restructuring costs partially offset by the previously mentioned reduction of M&A-related liabilities. Non-GAAP operating income for the year was $12.6 million compared to $13.5 million in 2022. This equates to 2% non-GAAP operating margin compared to 2.1% in 2022.
GAAP net loss for the year was $123.1 million or $1.79 per diluted share compared to a net loss of $29 million or $0.44 per diluted share for last year. This increase includes the previously mentioned onetime cost, plus a $13.9 million noncash impairment related to our 2022 investment in the MakerBot merger with Ultimaker, along with the previously mentioned M&A expenses. As a reminder, the 2022 GAAP net loss included a $39.1 million benefit from the 2022 merger I just referenced.
Non-GAAP net income for the year was $7.7 million or $0.11 per diluted share compared to a $10.3 million or $0.15 per diluted share last year. Adjusted EBITDA of $35 million compared to $36.1 million in 2022 reflected our overall lower revenues that more than offset the improvement in margins. We used $7.7 million of cash in our operations during the fourth quarter compared to a use of $18.1 million of cash from operations in the same period last year.
Excluding the onetime costs related to the M&A activity noted earlier, we generated approximately $7 million in operating cash flow. We ended the quarter with $162.6 million in cash, cash equivalents and short-term deposits, compared to $184.6 million at the end of the third quarter of 2023. Our balance sheet and cash generation profile remains strong, supporting our interest to capitalize on value-enhancing opportunities as we navigate through the near-term challenges.
Now let me turn to our outlook for 2024. Based on the perspective that the softness in global capital purchasing conditions continues to be challenging, but we expect to see improvement in the back half of the year. For comparison purposes, 2023 revenue, excluding divestitures and annualizing Covestro, was approximately $616 million. We expect 2024 revenue to grow to a range of $630 million to $645 million with revenues growing sequentially each quarter through the year, resulting in notably higher revenues in the second half of the year as compared to the first.
Non-GAAP gross margin for 2024 is expected to improve to a range of 49% to 49.5%, with the second half stronger than the first half, based primarily on the expected rise in revenue throughout the year. In 2024, we expect our operating expenses to range between $292 million to $297 million, slightly higher than 2023. Continued improvement in profitability is an important objective and, for 2024, we expect to see a return to growth across the profit metrics.
For 2024, we expect operating income to be in the range of 2.5% to 3.5% of revenue, with the second half stronger than the first half based on the anticipated rise in revenue throughout the year. We expect a GAAP net loss of $88 million to $72 million or $1.24 to $1.01 per diluted share and non-GAAP net income of $9 million to $14 million or $0.12 to $0.19 per diluted share for 2024.
Adjusted EBITDA for 2024 is expected to be in the range of $40 million to $45 million. We expect to see EBITDA reach 15% of our revenues longer term as our margins improve over time. We expect our capital expenditures for 2024 to range between $20 million and $25 million.
Finally, we expect to deliver positive operating cash flow for the full year, excluding any further onetime costs related to M&A activities.
With that, let me turn the call back over to Yoav for closing remarks. Yoav?

Yoav Zeif

Thank you, Eitan. I want to thank our global teams for their professionalism and dedication to help drive continued profitability as our business grows and creates long-term value for our customers and all our stakeholders. I am particularly proud of our Israeli employees and their families, many of whom were called to military service for most of the fourth quarter, as well as our employees worldwide who stepped up valiantly to carry the additional workload. This effort helped ensure that our business operation was uninterrupted with no material impact.
We continue to differentiate ourselves from the sector with the strongest combination of best-in-class technologies, an unparalleled go-to-market infrastructure, and an ongoing focus on operating efficiencies. Our customers are currently challenged by macro conditions that constrain their spending, slowing their pace of purchasing our product that can advance their transition to digital manufacturing at scale.
However, we view these challenges as only a delay in the inevitable widespread and faster adoption of additive manufacturing. One need only look at the continued high utilization of existing systems and the strong levels of engagement to share our optimism. We are excited for 2024 and beyond outscore strategies as we continue to lay the foundation for expanded applications to drive accelerated growth.
With that, let's open it up for questions. Operator?

Question and Answer Session

Operator

(Operator Instructions) Our first question is coming from Greg Palm from Craig-Hallum.

Danny James Eggerichs

Yes. This is Danny Eggerichs on for Greg today. I guess I'll just start with consumables, pretty strong quarter, obviously a record number. It doesn't sound like it, but any signs point to potential drawdowns on inventory at customers? Or you feel like you got pretty good visibility there and think you can continue that kind of growth throughout 2024? And then I guess, what was Covestro contribution in the quarter?

Eitan Zamir

Danny, so maybe I'll start -- it's Eitan -- I'll start from the end. Covestro, I believe we've mentioned in the past, it's roughly $4 million to $5 million a quarter, and we were in that range also in Q4 2023. And we believe that the next year will be similar, if not growing. And then, on the second question...

Yoav Zeif

Maybe I'll jump in here. Thank you for the question, Danny. So, I think -- actually it's a reason for celebration as an industry, because consumables are the indication that someone is really using our equipment and that additive manufacturing is adding value. And that's what we are doing in Stratasys. So it's a record $63 million of consumable this quarter, $246 million for the entire year. And the most important thing that we see increase in machine utilization.
And it's so important because consumables are the key to really penetrate manufacturing because you have more materials, you penetrate more applications and more use cases. We just introduced a new material for the Origin. It means that we open up completely new applications for weatherability application where you need durability, you need better performance, you need better material, you need better parts. This is an essential part of our strategy, and we see that it works.
On top of it, we also see that Covestro is adding value to Stratasys across different technologies because the WeatherX is a Covestro material that we adopted for our Origin platform. And it's also, of course, contributing to the gross margin, because we have a higher gross margin on material. So to sum up, material is key to penetrate into manufacturing. It brings more -- higher gross margin, and we see that it's growing with and without Covestro. And we believe that it will keep growing going forward.

Danny James Eggerichs

Yes. No, that's good. That makes sense. Maybe just switching to systems, I think you had mentioned that you're kind of expecting maybe a bounce back in demand in the second half. Is that baked into 2024 revenue guidance? And if so, how much?

Yoav Zeif

So definitely, it is part of the plan. But with a very -- in a very thoughtful way, where we make sure that, like we were exactly within the guidance in 2023, we want to make sure that we are exactly within the guidance [currently] in 2024. So when we say a number, it is baked, but it's also with high level of certainty. And when you talk about certainty, hardware practically is the most sensitive offering that we have in this industry. And it's across the board, not us, all players are seeing it. It's sensitive offering because it's sensitive to the macro backdrop, to the economic uncertainty, and also to the high interest rate. It creates CapEx constraints with the largest companies in the world.
However, I believe it is not a long-term phenomenon, because there is so far you can postpone investment if you are competing in your market. Take an automotive player, at the end, they will need to invest in new lines, they will need to invest in new design, they will need to compete with EV that is coming from the East. So, we see this pent-up demand. And we believe that the situation that we are facing now is only temporary. And the moment we will start seeing some recovery, and we're talking about recovery, we see kind of the spring of recovery, very small signs, but they are there.
We see flattening sales cycles in some hardware, it's even shorter sales cycles. We see improved pipeline mainly for the second half. And we also see PMI, the Purchasing Manager Index, a bit better, mainly in the U.S., it's the first time in January that the PMI index crossed the 50 range. And it means that U.S. B2B market is not contracting anymore. It's not growing yet, but it's not contracting. So we believe that all those good signs would create the first steps of recovery and then release the pent-up demand that is still there. And we have the F3300 exactly on time, and we are going to launch it in Q2 -- in the end of around Q2, ready to address this pent-up demand. So practically, in 1 sentence, we worked really hard over the last 2 years of tough macroeconomic conditions to make sure that we are ready to capture this pent-up demand.

Danny James Eggerichs

Yes. Understood. That's all very helpful. I'll leave it there.

Operator

Next question is coming from Troy Jensen from Cantor Fitzgerald.

Troy Donavon Jensen

Congrats on the good results here, and I love all these pent-up demand comments. I'm on the same page as you. Quickly -- yes, very welcome -- so quickly, Yoav, did you give the percentage of sales that are going into production applications? I think I heard part of it, but if you could clarify that, it'd be great.

Yoav Zeif

Yes. Thank you, Troy, for the question. So, we have a very simple laser-sharp strategy. We are going for manufacturing. And we are going for manufacturing with the new technologies, very innovating, like the F3300 that really disrupt the FDM market with new use cases like the dentures with consumables that open up new applications with differentiated software, we can talk about it later, and with SDM as a tool.
So, when we are looking at that, practically what we are saying that the entire market is ready for us to really get into the new area of additive manufacturing. We are measuring it, because if you are not measuring it, all this is a one big story. So we are taking each one of those driver, and we are measuring how it helps us to get into manufacturing. We were -- 32.5% of our sales were to manufacturing, this year 34%. What does it mean? It means that we are in the right direction. It means that we are taking the right steps. The strategy is working. But it also means that the B2B market in manufacturing is heavily constrained by CapEx. But eventually, the majority of our printed parts will be in manufacturing, [great] end-use parts.

Troy Donavon Jensen

Yes, totally agree. A follow up here then for Eitan. I know you guys are proud and talk frequently about this, 10 consecutive quarters of non-GAAP profits. I'd point out that you've also had 8 consecutive quarters of negative cash flow from operations. So, looking at your guidance, if you guys are going to do 1% to 3% operating margins in any given quarter, in any given year, it's going to imply further cash usage. So can you just talk about cash generation goals or cash flow positive? When do you think you'll hit targets like this?

Eitan Zamir

Thanks, Troy, for the question. So, as I was saying that in the last 2 quarters, so Q3 2023 and Q4 2023, we actually had positive operating cash flow when excluding one-off payments related to the M&A, including the penalty to DM. So, our business in Q3 and Q4 this year, so not like last year 2023, not in the future, actually proved that the business can generate positive operating cash flow when you exclude these one-offs. Together with that, maybe you saw but -- or you'll see in the last 2 quarters, our inventory levels went down. This trend will continue in 2024. It will improve our working capital for the next year. So, to your question, we're positive about our ability to generate positive operating cash flow in 2024. Excluding one-offs, our business will generate positive in 2024.

Troy Donavon Jensen

Awesome. Right. Well, good luck and keep up the good work there.

Operator

Next question is coming from Jim Ricchiuti from Needham & Company.

James Andrew Ricchiuti

So it sounds like you're fairly pleased with the progress you're making in the dental market. I wonder if you might be able to share with us what the level of revenues are in this vertical and maybe what the growth rate was last year versus 2022?

Eitan Zamir

Thank you for the question. We are not sharing the exact numbers. I can only say that we grew significantly in dental. And we are focusing on the restorative sector of the dental market, which practically, it's really non-discretionary. If you have a problem, you have to deal with it. And our focus is denture, and we believe in this area because we are disrupting the market. We are disrupting the market in a way that creates significant value to each one of the stakeholders.
If you take the value chain, you start with the patient, it's simply more convenient, easy to use. We have great results and great feedback. We are talking about tens of thousands of people already working with our dentures, the TrueDent. If you take the dentist, we have reduced the visits significantly from 4 to 5 to 1 to 2. You take the labs that are producing, we dramatically reduced the cost because we save on labor. So this is the idea for us in dental.
Additive manufacturing can transform dental because practically we are disrupting this market and make it digital. And our focus is on the restorative market, and we are developing unique business model to capture more of this value that we are creating along the value chain to each one of the participants.

James Andrew Ricchiuti

Hopefully, down the road, we have a better idea of the contribution it's making to the business. But maybe shift gears, Eitan, how should we be thinking about Q1 seasonality, just given Q4 was atypical, right? In terms of the seasonal weakness, given the weak capital spending environment, is Q1 -- do we think about Q1 the way we normally would in terms of the seasonal decline from Q4?

Eitan Zamir

Yes. Thanks, Jim. So the answer is yes. We expect -- we believe that the seasonality that is typical to our industry will continue also in 2024 with gradually increase in revenue and profitability throughout the year. So that trend will continue.

Operator

Next question is coming from Ananda Baruah from Loop Capital Markets.

Ananda Prosad Baruah

Yes. I guess, you know, I'd love to get some context for is signposts inside of your key businesses as distinct from macro, if you can give us some context around them that you're looking for to catalyze adoption in important areas of your businesses. And signposts could be, if even anecdotal things that your customers or different industry sectors are working on, maybe particular sort of technical thresholds that they're looking for to move beyond to catalyze adoption. That would be awesome.

Yoav Zeif

Thank you, Ananda, for the question. We are catalyzing the adoption by being super frank with ourselves. We are going to manufacturing, but we are going to manufacturing in a structured way. We build a whole structure and framework. What does it mean? Manufacturing together with our customers. And we are going 1 by 1 to make sure that we are achieving it. And the way to do it goes through 2 avenues, I would say. One is use cases. We identify the use cases where only additive can deliver and we deliver value.
The second one is, we do it with our customers. We have a customer advisory board. We do it with our customers, with customers like Toyota, like Siemens, like McLaren, Daimler, the U.S. government. We make sure that we are not inventing or dreaming about use cases. We do it with our customers. We develop the end-to-end solution that includes both the hardware, the software, the material, also a specific service that they need. We put it all under 1 umbrella of software and we do it with them.
This is the way to ensure adoption because we are not trying to reduce the cost of Toyota Corolla by $50. We are identifying with our customers the applications and the use cases and there are many. You know I put an example of the dentures where we created significant value, but many other applications, like fashion, like aerospace, drones for example. We are working with our customers to design better drones that save on energy and make sure the distance of the drone is much longer. So, those types we are doing with our customers, and it's a use case by use case, together with the customer. For example, the EV, we are working with customer on a solution, lighter solution for electric vehicles, and so on and so forth. The key here, do it with your customer per use case, where only additive can do it. A good example is also Toyota and F3300.

Ananda Prosad Baruah

So that's super helpful. And it gave me an idea for a follow-up, which I think really will get at maybe unpacking a little bit more of the heart of my question. That's a super good tee-up. And this might be a little bit of a challenging question, just because I'm sure different industry -- different customers in different industries are in different places. But I guess, is there any general context you can provide around? In the process, you just described how much, until you really can catalyze up the revenue opportunity in your key segments, how much is more dependent on you guys forwarding the technologies to particular thresholds versus how much of it is you have the technologies sort of relatively to where they need to be to be dangerous. It's really a matter of time and just getting into the design cycles and going through the design cycle process, which I know can take some years depending on category. And that's it for me.

Yoav Zeif

It's a great question. Very hard to relate to because average will kill everything here. It's like every application and every use case is a story by itself. Some application, some use case, we already have the full solution end to end. Take the dentures, for example, you take tooling, jigs and fixtures, we have the right software. We have everything, it's ready. It's about the customer adopting it based on their cycle. You take other application, we still have a way to go, like in medical, for example, in fashion, we have a way to go to make sure that the customers are really adopting it together with us, connectors for example, we are there, but the customers still need us to all these [hands]. But demand is strong. We see the engagement because the customer advisory board that I mentioned, they wouldn't spend days with us if they wouldn't understand. And there are things that they can do with additive that they cannot do with anything else. And it is creating competitive advantage for them.
So, I'm not going to give you an average. I can just say that, 1, we are engaging and we are working with customers at different levels, it depends on the different use cases. But we are not talking about 10 years or 15 years. It's not something which is -- it's not biological. It's not like we need to wait someone to grow up 15 years. It's something that can take between 1 year or a few months to maximum 3 years, maybe a little bit more. Those applications that we are focusing in. And the second thing is that the demand is there, and it's kind of the growth paradox. We are struggling as an industry, take step by step by step, but we are progressing in the right way. And the moment they will adapt it either in the new cycle or for new product, we will see the growth coming in a big way.

Ananda Prosad Baruah

Yes. Yes, we've seen it before. That's super helpful. I really appreciate it.

Operator

Next question is coming from Brian Drab from William Blair.

Blake Stuart Keating

This is Blake on for Brian. I just wanted to ask about the revenue guidance. Can you talk -- you mentioned that you set out guidance that you can hit. Can you talk about the different dynamics that get you to the high end versus the low end of the range?

Eitan Zamir

Yes. Hi, Blake. So, I'll touch on some of the trends that kind of help us think about the low end and the high end. One is the launch of the F3300, that is going to be a significant growth driver in 2024. We've not launched it, as you know, but we actually see a huge demand and a significant backlog that starts to pile up. So, a successful year for F3300 can take us from the low end to the high end. So that's one growth engine.
The other one that also you have mentioned earlier is consumable. That's something that we have high certainty that it will continue to grow in 2024. But of course it depends. Software is another growth engine that it takes time to reach the high revenue levels that start to be very meaningful, but still something that comes with very high margins and increased significantly in 2023. We believe that the trend will continue. And of course, above all, there is also the macro question that, of course, can impact whether we are at the lower or the high end or somewhere on that scale based on what the macro will do in 2024.

Yoav Zeif

Yes. And if just to add to what Eitan said, for a more strategic perspective, when we are coming with such type of guidance, it's based on the foundations that we build. We truly believe that we are ready to capture the next phase of growth, like I talked with Ananda. And we are ready because practically we are leading the industry in terms of performance and customer preference. We are growing, yes, not a lot, but in a declining market. We have record consumable sales with higher utilization.
We increased our market share over the last 3 years. We demonstrate financial -- actually unique financial stability in terms of profitability, gross margin, no debt, cash flow. And we have a strategy with 5 growth engines of the new technologies, the new use cases, the consumable, the software and SDM as a driver into manufacturing. And we built over the last 3 years foundations like the go-to-market, the diversified portfolio, the relationship with our customers, the Siemens and the Toyota and the U.S. government of the world, that makes us ready for this. That's why we have the comfort and the confidence to come with that guidance in a tough time, because we are ready.

Blake Stuart Keating

Understood. Appreciate all the color. And then, just lastly for me, so you guys talked about a couple of opportunities with the P3 systems and Origin with new materials and software. Can you update us on progress with Origin and those systems? At the time of the acquisition, you said you expected up to $200 million in incremental revenue within 5 years. Since you're a little over halfway, I was just wondering if you had an update on that progress. And then what markets are you seeing the most demand for those systems?

Yoav Zeif

Definitely, the market for the Origin and the SAF, which are [arrowhead] for manufacturing. The market -- our industrial markets, high end, high parts properties, very demanding and that's what we are doing. Both P3 and SAF are focusing at the high-end market, the automotive, the aerospace, and high-end industrial, because no one can match the quality of the part that we have.
We used the last 2 years to make them much more reliable. I can say that now they are meeting all Stratasys standards and are aligned with the standard of FDM, which we are very proud of. And now, it's all about materials because we want to open up new industrial applications. So, the WeatherX, which is very unique in the market, you can put it outside in the sun, in the rain, it will work. And same with SAF, it's the PA12. It's new materials like polypropylene in the future, where only SAF can do it because of the thermal control that we have. So it's a very simple strategy. We go for high-end industrial, this is Stratasys. We go for the high end. We go in with those technologies that we put a lot of energy and brain into the innovation of those systems and we do it with unique materials.

Operator

Next question is coming from Jacob Stephan from Lake Street.

Jacob Michael Stephan

Apologies if this has been asked already. I'm just jumping between calls this morning. But maybe you could talk about some of the bigger platform systems, the F3300, H350, and just kind of compare the sales cycles and also just kind of the demand pipeline of the Origin and kind of Neo systems.

Yoav Zeif

Thank you, Jacob, for the question. No doubt, the bigger the system, the longer the sales cycle. That's an easy one. But also, it's where we shine a strategy because this is our focus. What we promise and deliver to our customer is the reliability, the part property, the lower cost per part. And then, we see nice -- I would say nice, but a bit longer sales cycle that can -- sales tracker in Stratasys can go from 1 month to practically 5 months or 6 months, and a large deal, even a year, like deals like with the government and others. But on average, the nice thing that we see since Q4 -- Q3, Q4 last year that the second derivatives of the sales cycle is better, so it's flattening. And in some hardware and some type of product also shortening sales cycle.
F3300, I'm happy to share, it is a bit easier because it's disruptive and it created a lot of excitement in the market because we are bringing something that doesn't exist. We are bringing large format FDM with all the qualities of Stratasys, but double the speed and almost half the cost. It's an expensive system, but the ROI is very short because of it. and there are new things that the customers can do that they couldn't do with other machines. So, despite the fact that it's a high cost, high price machine, we see better sales cycle, at least at the beginning.

Jacob Michael Stephan

Got it. That's helpful. And then maybe just 1 more kind of vertical-related. What are you seeing in kind of the aerospace market? It seems like there's been a lot of investment and focus around this market, but maybe you could just kind of touch on your strategy there and also any progress that you've made?

Yoav Zeif

It's 1 of our top verticals. It's no, nothing new here. And it's 1 of our top verticals because of our quality and experience there and really unique knowledge and solutions that we are bringing. We are also -- we are the first one to introduce new materials into this area and to certify them together with certified bodies, starting with the U.S. But the most important thing is, we are delivering there. We have real success on the ground with the government, with NAVAIR, and with the Air Force, and with NASA, and we have all advisory committee that few advisory committee, I mean, customers, advisory committee that leading figures from the industry are contributing what is really needed for them.
So bottom line, aerospace, we have -- I don't want to say #1, but probably #1 position there, supported by the experience from the government, customers that are developing with us unique applications. Together, we are practically partnering on project and we believe that the new FDM platform will be their leading solution for aerospace.

Jacob Michael Stephan

Got it. That's helpful. Good luck going forward here, guys.

Operator

Thank you. We've reached the end of our question-and-answer session. I'd like to turn the floor back over to Yoav for any further closing comments.

Yoav Zeif

Thank you for joining us. Looking forward to updating you again next quarter.

Operator

Thank you. That does conclude today's teleconference and webcast. You may disconnect your line at this time, and have a wonderful day. We thank you for your participation today.

Advertisement