U.S. Markets closed
  • S&P Futures

    4,116.25
    -10.25 (-0.25%)
     
  • Dow Futures

    33,653.00
    -50.00 (-0.15%)
     
  • Nasdaq Futures

    13,724.75
    -69.50 (-0.50%)
     
  • Russell 2000 Futures

    2,179.00
    -5.00 (-0.23%)
     
  • Crude Oil

    62.61
    +0.17 (+0.27%)
     
  • Gold

    1,781.40
    +3.00 (+0.17%)
     
  • Silver

    25.90
    +0.06 (+0.23%)
     
  • EUR/USD

    1.2035
    -0.0006 (-0.0481%)
     
  • 10-Yr Bond

    1.5620
    -0.0390 (-2.44%)
     
  • Vix

    18.68
    +1.39 (+8.04%)
     
  • GBP/USD

    1.3930
    -0.0007 (-0.0515%)
     
  • USD/JPY

    107.9410
    -0.1290 (-0.1194%)
     
  • BTC-USD

    56,160.49
    +1,347.44 (+2.46%)
     
  • CMC Crypto 200

    1,286.75
    +52.34 (+4.24%)
     
  • FTSE 100

    6,859.87
    -140.21 (-2.00%)
     
  • Nikkei 225

    28,462.20
    -638.18 (-2.19%)
     

Is Reading International, Inc. (NASDAQ:RDI) Popular Amongst Insiders?

  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
Simply Wall St
·5 min read
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.
  • Oops!
    Something went wrong.
    Please try again later.

If you want to know who really controls Reading International, Inc. (NASDAQ:RDI), then you'll have to look at the makeup of its share registry. Generally speaking, as a company grows, institutions will increase their ownership. Conversely, insiders often decrease their ownership over time. I generally like to see some degree of insider ownership, even if only a little. As Nassim Nicholas Taleb said, 'Don’t tell me what you think, tell me what you have in your portfolio.

With a market capitalization of US$108m, Reading International is a small cap stock, so it might not be well known by many institutional investors. In the chart below, we can see that institutional investors have bought into the company. Let's take a closer look to see what the different types of shareholders can tell us about Reading International.

Check out our latest analysis for Reading International

ownership-breakdown
ownership-breakdown

What Does The Institutional Ownership Tell Us About Reading International?

Many institutions measure their performance against an index that approximates the local market. So they usually pay more attention to companies that are included in major indices.

As you can see, institutional investors have a fair amount of stake in Reading International. This suggests some credibility amongst professional investors. But we can't rely on that fact alone since institutions make bad investments sometimes, just like everyone does. When multiple institutions own a stock, there's always a risk that they are in a 'crowded trade'. When such a trade goes wrong, multiple parties may compete to sell stock fast. This risk is higher in a company without a history of growth. You can see Reading International's historic earnings and revenue below, but keep in mind there's always more to the story.

earnings-and-revenue-growth
earnings-and-revenue-growth

It looks like hedge funds own 8.7% of Reading International shares. That's interesting, because hedge funds can be quite active and activist. Many look for medium term catalysts that will drive the share price higher. The company's largest shareholder is James J. Cotter Living Trust, with ownership of 11%. In comparison, the second and third largest shareholders hold about 8.7% and 5.7% of the stock. In addition, we found that Ellen Cotter, the CEO has 3.8% of the shares allocated to his name

We did some more digging and found that 10 of the top shareholders account for roughly 53% of the register, implying that along with larger shareholders, there are a few smaller shareholders, thereby balancing out each others interests somewhat.

While studying institutional ownership for a company can add value to your research, it is also a good practice to research analyst recommendations to get a deeper understand of a stock's expected performance. There is a little analyst coverage of the stock, but not much. So there is room for it to gain more coverage.

Insider Ownership Of Reading International

While the precise definition of an insider can be subjective, almost everyone considers board members to be insiders. The company management answer to the board and the latter should represent the interests of shareholders. Notably, sometimes top-level managers are on the board themselves.

Most consider insider ownership a positive because it can indicate the board is well aligned with other shareholders. However, on some occasions too much power is concentrated within this group.

Our most recent data indicates that insiders own a reasonable proportion of Reading International, Inc.. Insiders have a US$11m stake in this US$108m business. It is great to see insiders so invested in the business. It might be worth checking if those insiders have been buying recently.

General Public Ownership

The general public, with a 32% stake in the company, will not easily be ignored. While this size of ownership may not be enough to sway a policy decision in their favour, they can still make a collective impact on company policies.

Private Company Ownership

We can see that Private Companies own 14%, of the shares on issue. Private companies may be related parties. Sometimes insiders have an interest in a public company through a holding in a private company, rather than in their own capacity as an individual. While it's hard to draw any broad stroke conclusions, it is worth noting as an area for further research.

Next Steps:

I find it very interesting to look at who exactly owns a company. But to truly gain insight, we need to consider other information, too. For instance, we've identified 2 warning signs for Reading International (1 is a bit concerning) that you should be aware of.

If you are like me, you may want to think about whether this company will grow or shrink. Luckily, you can check this free report showing analyst forecasts for its future.

NB: Figures in this article are calculated using data from the last twelve months, which refer to the 12-month period ending on the last date of the month the financial statement is dated. This may not be consistent with full year annual report figures.

This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.

Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team@simplywallst.com.