‘Rigged’: Federal US court awards $1.8B in damages after major realtor firms found guilty of conspiring to inflate commissions on home sales — and it turns out that was only the beginning
The National Association of Realtors’ (NAR) legal woes have gone from bad to worse.
A new federal class-action lawsuit has been filed in South Carolina, alleging the NAR and prominent real estate brokerage firm Keller Williams Realty colluded to artificially inflate agent commission rates, increasing costs for home sellers in the state.
Don’t miss
Millions of Americans are in massive debt in the face of rising rates. Here's how to get your head above water ASAP
Save big on your holiday shopping with an app that’s already saved Americans $160 million
Find out how to save up to $820 annually on car insurance and get the best rates possible
The lawsuit, filed on Nov. 6, seeks class-action status for all home sellers in South Carolina who used a listing broker affiliated with Keller Williams and listed their home on one of the NAR’s Multiple Listing Services (MLS) since November 2019.
It follows hot on the heels of a landmark ruling in Missouri, which found the NAR and some of the nation’s largest real estate brokerages — including HomeServices of America (owned by Berkshire Hathaway (BRK-A)) and two of its subsidiaries, and Keller Williams Realty — guilty of conspiring to keep commissions artificially high.
In the Missouri case, the federal court awarded $1.8 billion in damages, which could be tripled to more than $5.3 billion, according to Reuters, if the realtors are found to have breached U.S. antitrust law.
What’s the deal with broker commissions?
The lawsuits in Missouri and now in South Carolina are all about real estate broker commissions, which typically total around 5-6% of a property’s selling price in the U.S. and are often split 50-50 between the buyer’s agent and the seller’s agent.
At the heart of the complaint are several NAR policies deemed to have wrongfully impacted competition among real estate brokers — including one rule that recommends multiple listing services (MLSs) conceal the total broker commission offered from prospective property buyers.
The plaintiffs in the successful Missouri suit argued these policies have “severe anticompetitive effects” and make “no economic sense, except for the buyer broker,” who could technically steer homebuyers toward properties that offer a higher commission, which homebuyers ultimately have to shoulder.
The new South Carolina lawsuit states: “The effect of these rules is not simply that the seller must pay the buyer broker's compensation. These rules effectively take the compensation structure out of the view of the buyers and sellers, masking who pays the buyer broker's compensation.
“Indeed, a buyer broker may not even present an offer to a seller that is conditional on the seller reducing the buyer broker commission.”
Read more: Thanks to Jeff Bezos, you can now use $100 to cash in on prime real estate — without the headache of being a landlord. Here's how
According to a U.S. Department of Justice release on this issue, realtors have also been accused of misleading buyers into thinking that their broker services are free when, typically, they could be anything up to 3% of the home purchase price.
That can equal quite a lot of money for those buying a home, which is all the more painful in this time of elevated house prices and mortgage rates.
For a house selling at $500,000 with a 6% even-split broker commission, the home buyer would be paying $15,000 to the buyer agent — a fee they could potentially negotiate down if the commissions were fairly disclosed.
According to Zillow, the average home price in Missouri is $237,659 as of October 2023. This translates to approximately $7130 to the buyer agent, based on a 6% even-split broker commission. In the South Carolina, the average home price is $287,065, which equals about $8612 based on the same split.
Realtors intend to appeal verdict
The accused real estate groups and brokerages continue to deny wrongdoing.
Two defendants — Re/Max (RMAX) and Anywhere Real Estate (HOUS), whose brands include Century 21, Coldwell Banker and Corcoran — settled before the trial for $55 million and $83.5 million, respectively, without admitting liability.
Those involved in the Missouri court case have announced their intentions to appeal the verdict — a process that could take several years.
“This matter is not close to being final,” NAR president Tracy Kasper said in a statement after the verdict was announced. “We will appeal the liability finding because we stand by the fact that NAR rules serve the best interests of consumers, support market-driven pricing and advance business competition.”
The NAR will tackle any future legal challenges under new leadership as the group’s CEO Bob Goldberg just announced he will step down at the end of the month. Nykia Wright has been appointed as interim CEO and will assume the role effective Nov. 20.
Meanwhile, a spokesperson for HomeServices expressed disappointment with the court’s ruling and told CNN: “Today’s decision means that buyers will face even more obstacles in an already challenging real estate market and sellers will have a harder time realizing the value of their homes.”
Plaintiff attorney Ketchmark dismissed that statement after the ruling, accusing the realtors of being “desperate to hang on to the system that they have rigged against everyone.”
He has since filed a new class-action lawsuit against other real estate giants, including Douglas Elliman, Compass and Redfin, alleging once again that they violated antitrust laws by conspiring to keep commissions high.
What to read next
Owning real estate for passive income is one of the biggest myths in investing — but here's how you can actually make it work
The US dollar has lost 87% of its purchasing power since 1971 — invest in this stable asset before you lose your retirement fund
Finish 2023 stronger than you started: 5 money moves you should make before the end of the year
This article provides information only and should not be construed as advice. It is provided without warranty of any kind.
