Should We Worry About The EW Scripps Company’s (NASDAQ:SSP) P/E Ratio?

In this article:

This article is for investors who would like to improve their understanding of price to earnings ratios (P/E ratios). We’ll look at The EW Scripps Company’s (NASDAQ:SSP) P/E ratio and reflect on what it tells us about the company’s share price. Based on the last twelve months, E.W. Scripps’s P/E ratio is 40.79. That corresponds to an earnings yield of approximately 2.5%.

View our latest analysis for E.W. Scripps

How Do I Calculate A Price To Earnings Ratio?

The formula for price to earnings is:

Price to Earnings Ratio = Share Price ÷ Earnings per Share (EPS)

Or for E.W. Scripps:

P/E of 40.79 = $16.85 ÷ $0.41 (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2018.)

Is A High P/E Ratio Good?

A higher P/E ratio means that investors are paying a higher price for each $1 of company earnings. That isn’t a good or a bad thing on its own, but a high P/E means that buyers have a higher opinion of the business’s prospects, relative to stocks with a lower P/E.

How Growth Rates Impact P/E Ratios

Earnings growth rates have a big influence on P/E ratios. That’s because companies that grow earnings per share quickly will rapidly increase the ‘E’ in the equation. That means even if the current P/E is high, it will reduce over time if the share price stays flat. Then, a lower P/E should attract more buyers, pushing the share price up.

Notably, E.W. Scripps grew EPS by a whopping 327% in the last year. And earnings per share have improved by 14% annually, over the last five years. I’d therefore be a little surprised if its P/E ratio was not relatively high.

How Does E.W. Scripps’s P/E Ratio Compare To Its Peers?

The P/E ratio essentially measures market expectations of a company. As you can see below, E.W. Scripps has a much higher P/E than the average company (11.9) in the media industry.

NasdaqGS:SSP PE PEG Gauge November 11th 18
NasdaqGS:SSP PE PEG Gauge November 11th 18

That means that the market expects E.W. Scripps will outperform other companies in its industry. Shareholders are clearly optimistic, but the future is always uncertain. So investors should always consider the P/E ratio alongside other factors, such as whether company directors have been buying shares.

A Limitation: P/E Ratios Ignore Debt and Cash In The Bank

Don’t forget that the P/E ratio considers market capitalization. In other words, it does not consider any debt or cash that the company may have on the balance sheet. Hypothetically, a company could reduce its future P/E ratio by spending its cash (or taking on debt) to achieve higher earnings.

Spending on growth might be good or bad a few years later, but the point is that the P/E ratio does not account for the option (or lack thereof).

E.W. Scripps’s Balance Sheet

E.W. Scripps’s net debt is 41% of its market cap. If you want to compare its P/E ratio to other companies, you should absolutely keep in mind it has significant borrowings.

The Bottom Line On E.W. Scripps’s P/E Ratio

E.W. Scripps has a P/E of 40.8. That’s higher than the average in the US market, which is 18.2. Its debt levels do not imperil its balance sheet and it has already proven it can grow. So it does not seem strange that the P/E is above average.

When the market is wrong about a stock, it gives savvy investors an opportunity. If the reality for a company is better than it expects, you can make money by buying and holding for the long term. So this free visualization of the analyst consensus on future earnings could help you make the right decision about whether to buy, sell, or hold.

Of course you might be able to find a better stock than E.W. Scripps. So you may wish to see this free collection of other companies that have grown earnings strongly.

To help readers see past the short term volatility of the financial market, we aim to bring you a long-term focused research analysis purely driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis does not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements.

The author is an independent contributor and at the time of publication had no position in the stocks mentioned. For errors that warrant correction please contact the editor at editorial-team@simplywallst.com.

Advertisement