U.S. markets closed

CECEP Solar Energy Co.,Ltd. (000591.SZ)

Shenzhen - Shenzhen Delayed Price. Currency in CNY
Add to watchlist
7.07+0.13 (+1.87%)
At close: 03:04PM CST

CECEP Solar Energy Co.,Ltd.

Jieneng Mansion
7th Floor No. 42 Xizhimen North Street Haidian District
Beijing 100082
86 10 8305 2461

Full Time Employees1,859

Key Executives

NameTitlePayExercisedYear Born
Mr. Huixue ZhangGM & DirectorN/AN/A1969
Ms. Rongrong ZhangDeputy GM & Sec. of the BoardN/AN/A1972
Mr. Likai JiangChief EngineerN/AN/A1970
Mr. Zhong Xu YangDeputy Gen. Mang.N/AN/A1974
Mr. Zhong Hua HuangAssistant Gen. Mang.N/AN/AN/A
Amounts are as of and compensation values are for the last fiscal year ending on that date. Pay is salary, bonuses, etc. Exercised is the value of options exercised during the fiscal year. Currency in CNY.


CECEP Solar Energy Co.,Ltd. engages in the research and development, manufacture, and sale of photovoltaic products. The company engages in the technology research and development, manufacture, and sale of monocrystalline silicon products, and polycrystalline silicon battery and components. It also generates and sells solar energy; provides solar energy generation planning, technology research and development, design consultation, integration, and operation maintenance services, as well as after-sale service; invests in, constructs, operates, maintains, and manages solar energy generation projects; and other related business, as well as manufactures generating system devices. The company was founded in 2009 and is based in Beijing, China. CECEP Solar Energy Co.,Ltd. operates as a subsidiary of China Energy Conservation and Environmental Protection Group Co., Ltd.

Corporate Governance

CECEP Solar Energy Co.,Ltd.’s ISS Governance QualityScore as of N/A is N/A. The pillar scores are Audit: N/A; Board: N/A; Shareholder Rights: N/A; Compensation: N/A.

Corporate governance scores courtesy of Institutional Shareholder Services (ISS). Scores indicate decile rank relative to index or region. A decile score of 1 indicates lower governance risk, while a 10 indicates higher governance risk.